IdaGriz01
Well-known member
Uuuh, who pays the bills?WaGriz4life said:The fans feelings should never have anything to do with who is hired or fired. If that is true, Nebraska never deserves to be good ever againmtgrizrule said:Pelini's personality was not a good fit for many Nebraska fans. He clashed with too many influential people involved with the Husker program. He is a much better fit back at Youngstown. I am sure he will do great and get an opportunity at another FBS/BCS school within 5 years.
I like Pelini as a head coach. Unfortunately, Nebraska was a bad marriage for him.
As for Stitt, the potential upside of his hiring intrigues me. The more I hear and learn about him, the more impressed I am. Personality wise, from what I hear, he will be a great fit at Montana. I am not worried of him having his mouth get him in trouble with anyone, or putting the program under the spot light. He seems pretty solid in community and media relations. If and when he does have something to be said, it will be done so behind closed doors and not made public.
Only time will tell who is the better hire. I feel both will be great hires. without me knowing the Youngstown culture, environment etc. It is hard further evaluate and compare the 2 hires. Each hire does make sense for each program.
My gut feeling, which is influenced with some bias, tells me Stitt's hiring will be considered better when all is said and done.
A movie director -- which, in the end, is what a HC is -- who failed to put out films that pleased "the fans" would soon be out of work. That may seem unfair, but big-time college football now competes as part of the "entertainment" industry ... and that's how it works.
