Could I pay you money to post on bobcat nation, your own fan board. I would be happy to work that outWhy was there no safety in the picture? I heard they are really good.
Could I pay you money to post on bobcat nation, your own fan board. I would be happy to work that outWhy was there no safety in the picture? I heard they are really good.
Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.Could I pay you money to post on bobcat nation, your own fan board. I would be happy to work that out
Modest correction/clarification. We are infatuated with you eating shit.Good- D played physical, played well for how long they were on the field
Bad- Offensive play calling, abandoning the run, not getting positive yards on first down
Ugly- sCat fans infatuation with eating shit
He says confidently, knowing absolutely NOTHING about Hooked.Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.
Oh, I know. You don't me.He says confidently, knowing absolutely NOTHING about Hooked.
That doesn't necessarily make you a good fan, just an entitled fan it would seem.Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.
Hike is back with more empty commentary. Awesome. Can you explain to the message board what the run scheme was that occurred on the long run? Can you tell us what front the Griz were in? Did they run a stunt? Can you tell us how many high safeties there were? What gap did the run hit in? I’m happy to help you out after you’re able to answer zero of these questions.Why was there no safety in the picture? I heard they are really good.
It's obvious they didn't know what defense they were in. When was the last time a team had an 88-yard run against the Griz? In the words of the pod guys, stop accepting mediocrity and spewing false narratives that are hurting Griz football.Hike is back with more empty commentary. Awesome. Can you explain to the message board what the run scheme was that occurred on the long run? Can you tell us what front the Griz were in? Did they run a stunt? Can you tell us how many high safeties there were? What gap did the run hit in? I’m happy to help you out after you’re able to answer zero of these questions.
Just as I suspected, you have provided zero answers to any of those questions. Just admit you don’t know.It's obvious they didn't know what defense they were in. When was the last time a team had an 88-yard run against the Griz? In the words of the pod guys, stop accepting mediocrity and spewing false narratives that are hurting Griz football.
It’s very very easy to pick out the mouth breather cats trolls, and HikeGlacier is at the top of the list only because 5518 got the boot.He says confidently, knowing absolutely NOTHING about Hooked.
Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.
You've been a Griz fan since 1984?Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.
Yep.You've been a Griz fan since 1984?
Use the same logic on Gilman.Hooked didn't say the Cats had only 240 yards of rushing. He said that they had 240 yards without the long run. What's wrong with saying that? And, without that long run, the other 24 rushes averaged 4.5. To me, that's interesting information to know.
Don't forget about that apartment complex you donated...Bud, I've been a Griz fan for 40 years and have given more money to the University this year, than you have in your lifetime.
Means you have been a Griz fan for a shorter period than me.Yep.
What's your point? And it sounds like we both liked really bad football.Means you have been a Griz fan for a shorter period than me.
I just figured you would try to be a one-upper and say you misspoke, and meant 100 years or something.What's your point? And it sounds like we both liked really bad football.
I said nothing about whether Jones was good or bad based on backing out one long run. I just showed the stat. I found your Gillman stat to be interesting. Why is it so hard for some of you to read what I say? Why do you have to attack things I didn’t say?Use the same logic on Gilman.
He ran for 956 yards on 137 attempts, which is 7 yards per rush.
Take out the longest rush he had for each individual game, and you’re taking out 12 attempts that totaled 413 yards.
End result is 543 yards on 125 attempts. That’s a 4.3 yards per rush average.
So does this mean that Gilman isn’t as good because outside of the long runs he’s not as effective? I certainly don’t think so. Good backs are going to break long runs. The whole idea of taking things out to make it look better is just ludicrous. It happened! You can’t take it out. The run defense is just as responsible for that run as they were all the others.