yellowstone60
Well-known member
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aHwm72d8w0[/youtube]
IntuitiveGriz said:Question - With Caleb Hill today, just how happy were you with how well he played last week in Missoula and came out here and threw the ball well again?
Answer (Stitt) - He (Hill) looked good throwing the ball. What Caleb can do is pull it down and run with it a little bit also...he's a big, strong guy, he can hurt you with his legs. Caleb was probably the slowest coming along this spring because he was the newest guy. Everyday he gets better, he gets more comfortable with what we're doing...people want to play man-to-man (pressure the QB) and he can get up there through the OL and take off, he's going to make you pay."
Grisly Fan said:IntuitiveGriz said:Question - With Caleb Hill today, just how happy were you with how well he played last week in Missoula and came out here and threw the ball well again?
Answer (Stitt) - He (Hill) looked good throwing the ball. What Caleb can do is pull it down and run with it a little bit also...he's a big, strong guy, he can hurt you with his legs. Caleb was probably the slowest coming along this spring because he was the newest guy. Everyday he gets better, he gets more comfortable with what we're doing...people want to play man-to-man (pressure the QB) and he can get up there through the OL and take off, he's going to make you pay."
Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum.
Grisly Fan said:IntuitiveGriz said:Question - With Caleb Hill today, just how happy were you with how well he played last week in Missoula and came out here and threw the ball well again?
Answer (Stitt) - He (Hill) looked good throwing the ball. What Caleb can do is pull it down and run with it a little bit also...he's a big, strong guy, he can hurt you with his legs. Caleb was probably the slowest coming along this spring because he was the newest guy. Everyday he gets better, he gets more comfortable with what we're doing...people want to play man-to-man (pressure the QB) and he can get up there through the OL and take off, he's going to make you pay."
Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum. When you give up a an option then you just make your offense easier to defend. I welcome having a QB that can insert some uncertainty into the minds of defenders by stretching out plays.
I think what Fan is referring to is Stitt's going w/ Gustafson, who was not mobile. That made me wonder, too: What kind of QB does Stitt's O require?MrTitleist said:Grisly Fan said:Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum. When you give up a an option then you just make your offense easier to defend. I welcome having a QB that can insert some uncertainty into the minds of defenders by stretching out plays.
Go look at the offensive stats from the previous 4-5 years Stitt was at Mines. He always had a QB who was successful at running the football. Some people who post on this forum aren't very good at researching or knowing what they're talking about.
MrTitleist said:Grisly Fan said:IntuitiveGriz said:Question - With Caleb Hill today, just how happy were you with how well he played last week in Missoula and came out here and threw the ball well again?
Answer (Stitt) - He (Hill) looked good throwing the ball. What Caleb can do is pull it down and run with it a little bit also...he's a big, strong guy, he can hurt you with his legs. Caleb was probably the slowest coming along this spring because he was the newest guy. Everyday he gets better, he gets more comfortable with what we're doing...people want to play man-to-man (pressure the QB) and he can get up there through the OL and take off, he's going to make you pay."
Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum. When you give up a an option then you just make your offense easier to defend. I welcome having a QB that can insert some uncertainty into the minds of defenders by stretching out plays.
Go look at the offensive stats from the previous 4-5 years Stitt was at Mines. He always had a QB who was successful at running the football. Some people who post on this forum aren't very good at researching or knowing what they're talking about.
Grizzoola said:I think what Fan is referring to is Stitt's going w/ Gustafson, who was not mobile. That made me wonder, too: What kind of QB does Stitt's O require?MrTitleist said:Grisly Fan said:Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum. When you give up a an option then you just make your offense easier to defend. I welcome having a QB that can insert some uncertainty into the minds of defenders by stretching out plays.
Go look at the offensive stats from the previous 4-5 years Stitt was at Mines. He always had a QB who was successful at running the football. Some people who post on this forum aren't very good at researching or knowing what they're talking about.
Grisly Fan said:IntuitiveGriz said:Question - With Caleb Hill today, just how happy were you with how well he played last week in Missoula and came out here and threw the ball well again?
Answer (Stitt) - He (Hill) looked good throwing the ball. What Caleb can do is pull it down and run with it a little bit also...he's a big, strong guy, he can hurt you with his legs. Caleb was probably the slowest coming along this spring because he was the newest guy. Everyday he gets better, he gets more comfortable with what we're doing...people want to play man-to-man (pressure the QB) and he can get up there through the OL and take off, he's going to make you pay."
Huh, I thought Stitt's offense doesn't need a QB that can run to be effective....? Not sure how many times I read that posted in this forum. When you give up a an option then you just make your offense easier to defend. I welcome having a QB that can insert some uncertainty into the minds of defenders by stretching out plays.
IntuitiveGriz said:Coach Stitt has a great football mind, and is a very, very like-able guy... one that I am very glad to have leading our program. He is building something big.
He mentioned wanting to have the Spring Game every year in Butte... I would love the pigskin out of that!
Allezchat said:How is GJ'S mobility?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
I wonder whether losing four of the last five games (including to a poor MSU team at home) could have anything to do with it.daGrizJ said:IntuitiveGriz said:Coach Stitt has a great football mind, and is a very, very like-able guy... one that I am very glad to have leading our program. He is building something big.
He mentioned wanting to have the Spring Game every year in Butte... I would love the pigskin out of that!
I agree 100% IG. He's intelligent, articulate, has great enthusiasm, and knows and loves football. I just don't get all the haters.
I agree with Kem, Stitt has opened himself up for being judged. We should have never lost to a really bad one dimensional cat team and that was the final straw for some fans. I dont always like how some people attack Stitt and I am on his side at least for one more year, but I might join the "haiters" if he has another year like last year.daGrizJ said:IntuitiveGriz said:Coach Stitt has a great football mind, and is a very, very like-able guy... one that I am very glad to have leading our program. He is building something big.
He mentioned wanting to have the Spring Game every year in Butte... I would love the pigskin out of that!
I agree 100% IG. He's intelligent, articulate, has great enthusiasm, and knows and loves football. I just don't get all the haters.