garizzalies said:
PlayerRep said:
garizzalies said:
Hammer said:
This will be Micks last year and no he wont be fired. He has done exactly what he was hired to do, weather the storm and get the team through that rough stretch. The program is now back on the rise with fantastic recruits on the horizon. I think Mick deserves a big ovation and pat on the back for doing that. Remember, he didn't apply for the job, he was asked to do it. I think, under the circumstances, he has done a fantastic job.
Amen!! I would love to see grandpa bear put himself back out to pasture. If he could somehow go out on top, he would grow into a true grizzly legend. Otherwise, ripping the bandaid off would not be ideal but I don't wanna kick the can down the street like PR if they sleepwalk into the playoffs again.
What you can't understand or can't admit, is that keeping a coach (and his staff) that is taking the team to the playoffs year after year is not "kicking the can down the road".
What you can't understand or can't admit is that our coach is a lame duck. The recruits we are getting have to know a coaching change is inevitable during their college career.
A coach is a lame duck only if he's announced his intention to retire or his contract won't be renewed. I'm not aware that either of those 2 things have occurred. If he wants to continue (and I don't know whether he does or doesn't), and the team has a good season, then I don't see how UM could not renew his contract. If that is the case, then he is not a lame duck. He is merely a 70 plus year old coach.
Don't recruits and players usually know that coaches may not stay for their full 4/5 years at the school? Assistant coaches move on fairly often. Head coaches also change. Since Don Read left in 1995, UM has had only one head coach stay for 5 years or longer (Hauck).
On the other hand, I assume that having an older coach has some impact on recruiting--as do many other factors, like the offense the coach runs, the weight/locker rooms, the success of the program, the prior year, the stadium, the game day atmosphere, the local support, the position coaches, the other players, academic programs, the number of scholarships available, the schollie offered, the size of the town and weather, the number and quality of players at skill and specialty positions, former players in the NFL, etc. You seem to think the age of the coach is some overriding factor.
I went through a head coaching change before my senior year. There were some changes and a bunch of new position coaches, including mine, but it wasn't a huge deal. We still won the conference championship, and lost only 1 game.
A question for you. Do you think recruits would rather that an existing assistant coach would take over the program, or that the university intends to do a national search?