• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

News Story about Haslems decision

Spanky said:
ORGUNGRIZ said:
I agree with PTGrizzly. One year contract is pointless! If Stitt keeps all his current staff what changes can they make? Stitt told us all last year that he was going to evaluate everything right? Well his evaluation and “adjustments “ did not work!
Also if Stitt is given a 1 year extension and does fires DC and ST coach who does he get to replace them with the sell I have a one year contract?
I think a one year contract just leaves one more year to slide more into mediocrity.
Kent H needs to make the hard decision and left Stitt go!
We will know soon, probably after the play offs announcement. Money could still play a factor in the NCAA decision.
Not this time.
 
mtgrizrule said:
I honestly feel, it might be best if the GRIZ stick to their guns of 1 year extension and/or a DC and ST coaches being replaced. If Stitt refuses, then it is a Win Win for all parties to save face. I hope the GRIZ have some solid candidates in mind. I hope we don't have to go through another drastic offensive scheme change. Defense can be debated. I feel the talent is there. The depth at CB and Safety is questionable and/or pretty inexperienced.

This...

Its the easiest way out and keeps some stability... I don't think Haslem wants to see the coaches on the O side leave, But the whole D staff might be gone...
 
Paytonlives said:
kyle_sample said:
Paytonlives said:
By Colter Nuanez

With an embittered wave of his hand, Montana athletic director Kent Haslam swiped his winter hat off his head and wiped his reddened face. Haslam looked like a man with a painful decision to make.

By all accounts, that’s exactly what awaits Haslam.

As Haslam stood alone on the fifth floor of Bobcat Stadium, a party not seen in Bozeman in 12 years was in its infancy. Bobcat players and coaches mixed with a tidal wave of fans on the stadium’s turf to celebrate Montana State’s 31-23 win over the Grizzlies. Where the party was going was anybody’s guess. Chris Murray, the sophomore Bobcat quarterback with a million dollar smile and two wins over his rival, was asked how he thought he would celebrate. He didn’t know.

In that way, and that way only, do Murray’s and Haslam’s immediate futures dovetail.

While Murray will certainly revel in Saturday’s outcome, Haslam will deplore it. If it hasn’t happened already, in the coming days Haslam will determine the fate of head coach Bob Stitt, undoubtedly one of the most important decisions during Haslam’s tenure at Montana.

On the eve of Montana’s loss to the Bobcats, its first in Bozeman since 2005, a source texted Skyline Sports that a powerful and well connected booster had met with Haslam. The influential source said he was told that Montana had decided to extend its coach’s contract; Stitt would remain coach for three more years if he beat the Cats, and one year if he lost. According to sources familiar with the conversation, the booster told Haslam that he was risking further donations and putting his job in jeopardy by keeping Stitt in place for another three-year contract.

In the eyes of the donor class, many of whom have made their displeasure with the head coach known, what is at stake is a further slide into a mediocrity that has gripped the program for the better part of the decade. They fear a whitewashing of the prestige the program had built during a wildly successful 25-year run that produced two national championships, 17 consecutive playoff berths, 15 conference championships and what seemed to be a permanent place among the FCS’ most powerful programs.

Montana’s — and Stitt’s — second consecutive loss to the Bobcats further entrenched those fears.

“He should be gone,” said one booster.

“I think the program has gone down hill (sic) since (former head coach Mick) Delaney’s last 2 years,” added another booster.
When Haslam went to sleep Friday night, his defense of Stitt was an understandable one. Haslam has a coach with one playoff appearance, last season’s 6-5 disappointment and what appeared to be a difficult, but winnable game Saturday that would send the Griz back to the playoffs for the second time. The coach has a winning record despite heavily relying on backup quarterbacks. And Stitt has recruited a stable of talented, young players that created a hope for the future. That, according to sources, is what Haslam was going to use as his defense for extending Stitt.

“Haslam is defending the roster number of freshman,” one source wrote.

When Haslam goes to sleep on Saturday, that justification may have crumbled under the weight of a crushing loss that only became more difficult to swallow as the night went on. Six teams Montana was presumably on the FCS playoff bubble with all lost during the final week of the regular season, leaving the question of if the Griz will extend their season unanswered.

Even worse, the loss to the Cats was a glimpse into the rollercoaster ride Montana has been on since Stitt was hired.

A maligned defense again couldn’t solve its rival’s prolific rushing attack. It gave up big plays and worse, it appeared to take unnecessary risks that put the Griz in trouble. Instead of dropping seven or eight defenders, defensive coordinator Jason Semore sent the house on a third-and-21 that resulted in a 71-yard Nick LaSane touchdown that buried Montana in a 14-3 hole.

Stitt’s offense struggled in short yardage situations and was kept well below its season average scoring output by a defense that held it in check for a second consecutive year.

Perhaps the most maddening aspect of the loss to alums and boosters was that in a game that had outsized impact on the program’s playoff chances, the tight-knit team Stitt has described throughout the season looked to onlookers like a group more ready for the off-season than the most important game of the season.

“The sideline was flat. No energy, no will. That’s unacceptable,” a former player wrote in a message to Skyline Sports.

Even Murray noticed something was amiss with the Griz.

“Today we just had that bond,” said the Bobcats quarterback. “I honestly think Montana doesn’t have that type of bond and I think that’s been the difference the past two years.”

Whether or not Haslam has made a decision regarding his coach is yet to be determined. He may be waiting for the FCS selection committee to reveal the 2017 playoff bracket. Or he may have already agreed in principle with his coach. Haslam declined on Tuesday an opportunity to clear the air during an interview with an interview on ESPN Missoula, saying that he and Stitt would discuss an extension after the season.

However Haslam proceeds, there are few who would chose to trade places with him as the 2017 regular season draws to a close. As one booster put it, “(I) wouldn’t want to take all the shit Haslam will take if he extends Stitt.”

Photos by Brooks Nuanez and Jason Bacaj. All Rights Reserved.

I actually wrote that

Sorry... thats how the website had it listed... my apologies.

Not your fault. It actually led to us seeing the mistake and correcting it
 
dayday said:
I think he should bring in someone that can bring in some fresh ideas to supplement Stitt’s idea.
When has Stitt ever been receptive to someone else's fresh ideas? He is, after all, the genius.
 
Paytonlives said:
mtgrizrule said:
I honestly feel, it might be best if the GRIZ stick to their guns of 1 year extension and/or a DC and ST coaches being replaced. If Stitt refuses, then it is a Win Win for all parties to save face. I hope the GRIZ have some solid candidates in mind. I hope we don't have to go through another drastic offensive scheme change. Defense can be debated. I feel the talent is there. The depth at CB and Safety is questionable and/or pretty inexperienced.

This...

Its the easiest way out and keeps some stability... I don't think Haslem wants to see the coaches on the O side leave, But the whole D staff might be gone...
Yup, kicks the can down the road. The offense is only good against the patsies.
 
Paytonlives said:
bigkid said:
What a nightmare. Bob Stitt rides into Missoula with a load of shit, sells it, and makes it smell good.
In the meantime the cats begin a period of dominance, increase its fan base, and make it look easy.
Being at the game the two sidelines look completely different. cats are fired up and ready to get er done. Grizzly sidelines looks subdued and robotic. I guess we’ll just have to wait for msu to win 16 straight before someone wakes us the f### up. :twisted:

They have 3 straight losing seasons...
They have been the best football team in the state the last two years.
 
This bit of problems led me back to the tenure of Earl Solomonson. Cats had him at the helm to begin their downfall. It literally took 20 years to shake that monkey off their backs, if not more. How long you hold on to a coach(s) is in direct proportion to how long it will take to return to prominence. Hysell, Kramer, and Ash brought the Cats back, but not as fast or as complete as the boosters wanted. You can languish in mediocrity but it only extends the return. I don't know who to hire nor have any dog in the fight. All I have is 60+ years of information and experience. technically been a fan of the GRIZ since 69-70, and rooted for the cats till they got all pissy..... although 17 years can do that to a person.
 
kemajic said:
dayday said:
I think he should bring in someone that can bring in some fresh ideas to supplement Stitt’s idea.
When has Stitt ever been receptive to someone else's fresh ideas? He is, after all, the genius.

"Offensive" genius. At least that is what I heard.
 
kemajic said:
Paytonlives said:
bigkid said:
What a nightmare. Bob Stitt rides into Missoula with a load of shit, sells it, and makes it smell good.
In the meantime the cats begin a period of dominance, increase its fan base, and make it look easy.
Being at the game the two sidelines look completely different. cats are fired up and ready to get er done. Grizzly sidelines looks subdued and robotic. I guess we’ll just have to wait for msu to win 16 straight before someone wakes us the f### up. :twisted:

They have 3 straight losing seasons...
They have been the best football team in the state the last two years.

Big picture vs. little picture.
 
Paytonlives said:
kemajic said:
Paytonlives said:
bigkid said:
What a nightmare. Bob Stitt rides into Missoula with a load of shit, sells it, and makes it smell good.
In the meantime the cats begin a period of dominance, increase its fan base, and make it look easy.
Being at the game the two sidelines look completely different. cats are fired up and ready to get er done. Grizzly sidelines looks subdued and robotic. I guess we’ll just have to wait for msu to win 16 straight before someone wakes us the f### up. :twisted:

They have 3 straight losing seasons...
They have been the best football team in the state the last two years.

Big picture vs. little picture.
lol. So why didn't the genius-coached Montana team beat the snat out of them the last two years? The hole you're digging just keeps getting deeper.
 
griznhel said:
This bit of problems led me back to the tenure of Earl Solomonson. Cats had him at the helm to begin their downfall. It literally took 20 years to shake that monkey off their backs, if not more. How long you hold on to a coach(s) is in direct proportion to how long it will take to return to prominence. Hysell, Kramer, and Ash brought the Cats back, but not as fast or as complete as the boosters wanted. You can languish in mediocrity but it only extends the return. I don't know who to hire nor have any dog in the fight. All I have is 60+ years of information and experience. technically been a fan of the GRIZ since 69-70, and rooted for the cats till they got all pissy..... although 17 years can do that to a person.
Hysell didn't do anything; it was the Big Human who was the change agent. In more ways than one.
 
Haslam should have extended the contract BEFORE the Cat-Griz game. Now he's in a hell of a mess because he made it appear the decision was contingent on the game's outcome, as if that was going to affect Stitt's (or the team's) performance.

We lost a game. It's not the end of the world. People need to get a grip.
 
AllWeatherFan said:
Haslam should have extended the contract BEFORE the Cat-Griz game. Now he's in a hell of a mess because he made it appear the decision was contingent on the game's outcome, as if that was going to affect Stitt's (or the team's) performance.

We lost a game. It's not the end of the world. People need to get a grip.

..no we lost THE game..embrassing!
 
grizghost said:
AllWeatherFan said:
Haslam should have extended the contract BEFORE the Cat-Griz game. Now he's in a hell of a mess because he made it appear the decision was contingent on the game's outcome, as if that was going to affect Stitt's (or the team's) performance.

We lost a game. It's not the end of the world. People need to get a grip.

..no we lost THE game..embrassing!

Yeah, it's "embrassing" alright.
 
AllWeatherFan said:
Haslam should have extended the contract BEFORE the Cat-Griz game. Now he's in a hell of a mess because he made it appear the decision was contingent on the game's outcome, as if that was going to affect Stitt's (or the team's) performance.

We lost a game. It's not the end of the world. People need to get a grip.

i believe "trending" is the word and it ain't good
 
Hey kem, I don't think anybody is clear about your position on Stitt.

Can you please post about that another 5000 times so we all understand? That goes for about 25 others on this forum as well.

:roll:
 
fanofzoo said:
AllWeatherFan said:
Haslam should have extended the contract BEFORE the Cat-Griz game. Now he's in a hell of a mess because he made it appear the decision was contingent on the game's outcome, as if that was going to affect Stitt's (or the team's) performance.

We lost a game. It's not the end of the world. People need to get a grip.

i believe "trending" is the word and it ain't good

I'll take 7-4 over 5-6 any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. :)
 
AllWeatherFan said:
Hey kem, I don't think anybody is clear about your position on Stitt.

Can you please post about that another 5000 times so we all understand? That goes for about 25 others on this forum as well.

:roll:
25-1. I still need clarification.
 
Back
Top