tnt said:CFallsGriz said:tnt said:Grizzoola said:Charles Ambrose, president of Central Missouri University, is a strong candidate, in my opinion. He's had similar experience at CMU as at UM, and has succeeded in solving university problems. Best of all, he has a clear vision of what UM has been, is, and could be.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/charles-ambrose-is-ready-to-lead-a-flagship-the-university/article_de162e00-1fb6-5428-825a-4e13508a038e.html
I have to agree. A university is whole bunch different than board room OR the military. You can't just say it and have it happen and the buck never stops moving..........
tnt, did you read the article? He fully acknowledged that.
Trump acknowledged it too, but living with it and dealing with it are two different things. As far as reading the article I did. His reume is bloated. Understand he has NO "command experience." A major Serves as primary Staff Officer for brigade and task force command meaning he carries out others work basically a gopher. Thats where most career officers top out. His GE experience as a "director" was at the same level. He was NOT the decision maker at any time. The academic equivalent would be a Vice president of XXX or at best Chancellor. This would be his first "command position" Not saying he wouldn't be good, just that the state of things now doesn't allow for an OJT president. Charles Ambrose on the other hand has proven himself in the job and dealing with the same issues UM is facing.
Here we go w the political stuff. Not going there. Im fully familiar w military command structure but thanks for the synopsis. Not his personal advocate, but I feel to label him a "gopher" is a tad disrespectful albeit unsurprising considering the source. Your position is noted.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk