Where are all the Bizon Fans????

[ordigger]

My first few years of college were in ND. Actually pretty dang good looking women up there. That is if you like tall blonde Norwegians.... I like Montana women better (married one), but it isn't all heavy stock over there...

Not getting much attention anywhere else.

I'll take all 3.

What about the two chicks leftover?

I've never referred to guys as chicks, but by all means if that's your cup of tea, enjoy your chicks. I'll stick with the women.

 

[rimrockgriz]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What are you laughing at? The 5 straight trophies in the case?... :egriz:

 

[bobcatOninetails]

Actually, 2020 is part of the current decade.

It was killing me. Was sure you were correct but also suspected a duel meaning.

From Wiki "Although any period of 10 years is a decade,[2][3] a convenient and frequently referenced interval is based on the tens digit of a calendar year, as in using "1960s" to represent the decade from 1960 to 1969.[4][5] Often, for brevity, only the tens part is mentioned (60s or sixties), although this may leave it uncertain which century is meant. These references are frequently used to encapsulate popular culture or other widespread phenomena that dominated such a decade, as in The Great Depression of the 1930s.

Because the common calendar starts with year 1, its first full decade is the years 1 to 10, the second decade from 11 to 20, and so on.[6] So although the "1960s" comprises the years 1960 to 1969, the "197th decade" spans 1961 to 1970."

 

[mtgriz]

Actually, 2020 is part of the current decade.

It was killing me. Was sure you were correct but also suspected a duel meaning.

From Wiki "Although any period of 10 years is a decade,[2][3] a convenient and frequently referenced interval is based on the tens digit of a calendar year, as in using "1960s" to represent the decade from 1960 to 1969.[4][5] Often, for brevity, only the tens part is mentioned (60s or sixties), although this may leave it uncertain which century is meant. These references are frequently used to encapsulate popular culture or other widespread phenomena that dominated such a decade, as in The Great Depression of the 1930s.

Because the common calendar starts with year 1, its first full decade is the years 1 to 10, the second decade from 11 to 20, and so on.[6] So although the "1960s" comprises the years 1960 to 1969, the "197th decade" spans 1961 to 1970."

Yeah, I was stirring the pot a bit. I was reckoning back to a Seinfeld episode, when Jerry ridicules Newman for his new millennium party scheduled for the wrong year.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=newman%27s+millenium+party+on+seinfeld&&view=detail&mid=E97BC2DC574395BB6782E97BC2DC574395BB6782&rvsmid=E97BC2DC574395BB6782E97BC2DC574395BB6782&fsscr=0&FORM=VDMCNL

 

[2011BisonAlumni]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

Montana has a coach who teaches his team a style of play that is soft. Teams like his fold time after time again. You guys had it with Hauck. Had he stayed or had you guys went with a coach teaching his system, there is no doubt you would have won championships. He knew what it took to win. You were a crazy physical team and ran the ball extremely well. Montana is filled with kids that fit that mold, but for some reason you guys prefer coaches who want to play a style of ball that has proven largely to be ineffective come playoff time and recruit players, to try to fit that style of play, who are soft.

Sorry just calling it how I see it. I'll be worried about Montana becoming a big time title contender again if they ever figure it out with a coach. Recruiting wise you have everything. Great college town. Great stadium. Soon to be great facilities. Great fan support. Only thing holding it back is pansy ass coaches who don't know how to get it done.

 

[UMcheer2000]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

Montana has a coach who teaches his team a style of play that is soft. Teams like his fold time after time again. You guys had it with Hauck. Had he stayed or had you guys went with a coach teaching his system, there is no doubt you would have won championships. He knew what it took to win. You were a crazy physical team and ran the ball extremely well. Montana is filled with kids that fit that mold, but for some reason you guys prefer coaches who want to play a style of ball that has proven largely to be ineffective come playoff time and recruit players, to try to fit that style of play, who are soft.

Sorry just calling it how I see it. I'll be worried about Montana becoming a big time title contender again if they ever figure it out with a coach. Recruiting wise you have everything. Great college town. Great stadium. Soon to be great facilities. Great fan support. Only thing holding it back is pansy ass coaches who don't know how to get it done.

This.

Especially on the offense..

It may put up video game numbers in the BSC but doesnt get it done come playoffs, especially since our last deep run?

 

[AZGrizFan]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

YSU beat the best the Big Sky could offer on a fluke catch that happens once in 100 tries. It wasn't like they walked all over EWU. :roll: :roll:

Does NDSU NOT play physical or run the ball and play defense anymore? I mean, THEY lost too...

 

[1Griz_Fan]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

Montana has a coach who teaches his team a style of play that is soft. Teams like his fold time after time again. You guys had it with Hauck. Had he stayed or had you guys went with a coach teaching his system, there is no doubt you would have won championships. He knew what it took to win. You were a crazy physical team and ran the ball extremely well. Montana is filled with kids that fit that mold, but for some reason you guys prefer coaches who want to play a style of ball that has proven largely to be ineffective come playoff time and recruit players, to try to fit that style of play, who are soft.

Sorry just calling it how I see it. I'll be worried about Montana becoming a big time title contender again if they ever figure it out with a coach. Recruiting wise you have everything. Great college town. Great stadium. Soon to be great facilities. Great fan support. Only thing holding it back is pansy ass coaches who don't know how to get it done.

So what you're saying is that a soft Montana team beat the Bison in Missoula last year. Sweet cause when they are not so soft the Bison will be defeated by them again. Although what you say may hold some truth about the Griz being soft etc. your mighty Bison lost to them and another soft team, South Dakota, last year while losing this last weekend despite playing physical, running the ball and strong defense so we shall see what happens next season.

 

[2011BisonAlumni]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

YSU beat the best the Big Sky could offer on a fluke catch that happens once in 100 tries. It wasn't like they walked all over EWU. :roll: :roll:

Does NDSU NOT play physical or run the ball and play defense anymore? I mean, THEY lost too...

Sure they do. They just ran into a team that happened to be better at doing the same thing.

 

[2011BisonAlumni]

Yeah I saw that after I posted it. I meant next decade. Sorry! My mistake

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

Montana has a coach who teaches his team a style of play that is soft. Teams like his fold time after time again. You guys had it with Hauck. Had he stayed or had you guys went with a coach teaching his system, there is no doubt you would have won championships. He knew what it took to win. You were a crazy physical team and ran the ball extremely well. Montana is filled with kids that fit that mold, but for some reason you guys prefer coaches who want to play a style of ball that has proven largely to be ineffective come playoff time and recruit players, to try to fit that style of play, who are soft.

Sorry just calling it how I see it. I'll be worried about Montana becoming a big time title contender again if they ever figure it out with a coach. Recruiting wise you have everything. Great college town. Great stadium. Soon to be great facilities. Great fan support. Only thing holding it back is pansy ass coaches who don't know how to get it done.

So what you're saying is that a soft Montana team beat the Bison in Missoula last year. Sweet cause when they are not so soft the Bison will be defeated by them again. Although what you say may hold some truth about the Griz being soft etc. your mighty Bison lost to them and another soft team, South Dakota, last year while losing this last weekend despite playing physical, running the ball and strong defense so we shall see what happens next season.

Yep NDSU lost to Montana last year...in August. What happened in the playoffs? Teams that try to replicate playing Madden tend to do well in the season but struggle come playoff time. It's a fact. Not saying you can't win other ways, but the overwhelming majority of teams to have won a championship (high school, college even NFL) have a common formula and that formula does not envolve hurry up spread offenses.

FYI, NDSU lost to USD because USD ran the ball extremely well, controlled the TOP and played extremely well on defense. USD might not be that talanted, but definitely not a soft team.

NDSU lost last weekend to a team that did the same things NDSU does but better. There is not a snowballs chance in hell EWU would have beat JMU.

 

[Mousegriz]

Bison fans......realize you are entering the weird zone here. We bash our own team and coach relentlessly but we also find ways to bash the 4 FCS semifinalists, finalists, their fans, facilities, conferences, etc? We want a physical team that runs the ball and plays defense...until we get one!

 

[AZGrizFan]

True, it is possible. I would guess Montana has a good shot at one or two also.

Ah...not so sure about that. The #3 team in the MVFC just made the championship game and beat the best the Big Fluffy could offer. Why? They are physical, run the ball well and play defense. Why did JMU make the championship game? Physical, run the ball and play defense. Why did NDSU win 5 in a row? I think you get the picture.

Montana has a coach who teaches his team a style of play that is soft. Teams like his fold time after time again. You guys had it with Hauck. Had he stayed or had you guys went with a coach teaching his system, there is no doubt you would have won championships. He knew what it took to win. You were a crazy physical team and ran the ball extremely well. Montana is filled with kids that fit that mold, but for some reason you guys prefer coaches who want to play a style of ball that has proven largely to be ineffective come playoff time and recruit players, to try to fit that style of play, who are soft.

Sorry just calling it how I see it. I'll be worried about Montana becoming a big time title contender again if they ever figure it out with a coach. Recruiting wise you have everything. Great college town. Great stadium. Soon to be great facilities. Great fan support. Only thing holding it back is pansy ass coaches who don't know how to get it done.

So what you're saying is that a soft Montana team beat the Bison in Missoula last year. Sweet cause when they are not so soft the Bison will be defeated by them again. Although what you say may hold some truth about the Griz being soft etc. your mighty Bison lost to them and another soft team, South Dakota, last year while losing this last weekend despite playing physical, running the ball and strong defense so we shall see what happens next season.

Yep NDSU lost to Montana last year...in August. What happened in the playoffs? Teams that try to replicate playing Madden tend to do well in the season but struggle come playoff time. It's a fact. Not saying you can't win other ways, but the overwhelming majority of teams to have won a championship (high school, college even NFL) have a common formula and that formula does not envolve hurry up spread offenses.

FYI, NDSU lost to USD because USD ran the ball extremely well, controlled the TOP and played extremely well on defense. USD might not be that talanted, but definitely not a soft team.

NDSU lost last weekend to a team that did the same things NDSU does but better. There is not a snowballs chance in hell EWU would have beat JMU.

So why, pray tell, did you lose to Montana? By your logic that NEVER should have happened. Even in August. :roll: