This is How...

[SaskGriz]

You gonna back a guy who blamed the loss on Nash’s personal foul penalty? :lol: Good call, PR.

I'm not "backing" anyone. I'm just agreeing you are an idiot, sometimes.

Bottom line, we fired Coach Stitt for less than this. From what I've heard some of the "big money" wasn't happy with Coach Stitt's results, are those same people happy now? That's a serious question. Can someone like PR, give us direct quotes from "the boosters"?

Stitt was fired because in Year 3, and with mostly his own players, he couldn't beat the Cats and make the playoffs. If Hauck is losing to the Cats and not making playoffs in Year 3, he may be gone too. However, he won't be doing that.

The Big Boosters whom I have talked to are still high on Bobby. They have seen a different team this year, one that played harder and worked very hard to win. This was noticeable from the first game.

So, the Big Money Boys think Coach Haucks 6-5 was better than Coach Haucks 7-4? Are any of them going to release a statement on how one few win and a loss to the Cats is better than 7-4 and a loss to the Cats. We have metric in Canada so I might be confused. I'd way rather be 7-4 than 6-5 but that's just me. Hey, I see a difference as well, we won fewer games.

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

I'm not "backing" anyone. I'm just agreeing you are an idiot, sometimes.

Bottom line, we fired Coach Stitt for less than this. From what I've heard some of the "big money" wasn't happy with Coach Stitt's results, are those same people happy now? That's a serious question. Can someone like PR, give us direct quotes from "the boosters"?

Stitt was fired because in Year 3, and with mostly his own players, he couldn't beat the Cats and make the playoffs. If Hauck is losing to the Cats and not making playoffs in Year 3, he may be gone too. However, he won't be doing that.

The Big Boosters whom I have talked to are still high on Bobby. They have seen a different team this year, one that played harder and worked very hard to win. This was noticeable from the first game.

So, the Big Money Boys think Coach Haucks 6-5 was better than Coach Haucks 7-4? Are any of them going to release a statement on how one few win and a loss to the Cats is better than 7-4 and a loss to the Cats. We have metric in Canada so I might be confused. I'd way rather be 7-4 than 6-5 but that's just me. Hey, I see a difference as well, we won fewer games.

I think boosters realized that making a change also required time to make changes and get better.

 

[RainierGriz]

....you turn a 9-2 season into a 6-5 season. Come from ahead losses against WIU, UC-Davis and MSU. Excellent. Apparently Bobbyball isn’t capable of playing four consecutive quarters of football. Not sure Bobby’s “play not to lose” mentality is gonna work this time around. He remains one of the shittiest coaches I’ve ever seen at making adjustments and adjusting to the other coach’s adjustments. He also remains a petulant child when it comes to dealing with today’s players, and his “playing favorites” and running off talented players is gonna mire us in mediocrity for years.

Today he got outcoached by f***[*] Choate. Choate spotted him a 22 point lead, then diced him up and toyed with him for the last 35 minutes. Sure glad we fired Stitt so we could blow it all up again, go 6-5 with the easiest schedule we’ve had in 10 years and lose to the Scats again.

Where are all those Haucksuckers who said we’d win this game because “Bobby’s from Montana and he REALLY wants to win”...

:lol: :roll: :roll:

Next year, with that murderer’s row of a schedule, we’ll be dancing on the rooftops if we go 6-5. And miss the playoffs again.

Isn’t this freaking AWESOME???

Can’t say I’ve ever seen a more snowflake post in my life. Reminds me of a teenager throwing a sarcastic tantrum. If the Griz punch it in at the end, do you type this up? Likely not. Losing sucks and we certainly had our opportunities. But the grass always seems to be greener for you. My support is all this program will get from me. Go Griz. FTC.

 

[AZGrizFan]

....you turn a 9-2 season into a 6-5 season. Come from ahead losses against WIU, UC-Davis and MSU. Excellent. Apparently Bobbyball isn’t capable of playing four consecutive quarters of football. Not sure Bobby’s “play not to lose” mentality is gonna work this time around. He remains one of the shittiest coaches I’ve ever seen at making adjustments and adjusting to the other coach’s adjustments. He also remains a petulant child when it comes to dealing with today’s players, and his “playing favorites” and running off talented players is gonna mire us in mediocrity for years.

Today he got outcoached by f***[*] Choate. Choate spotted him a 22 point lead, then diced him up and toyed with him for the last 35 minutes. Sure glad we fired Stitt so we could blow it all up again, go 6-5 with the easiest schedule we’ve had in 10 years and lose to the Scats again.

Where are all those Haucksuckers who said we’d win this game because “Bobby’s from Montana and he REALLY wants to win”...

:lol: :roll: :roll:

Next year, with that murderer’s row of a schedule, we’ll be dancing on the rooftops if we go 6-5. And miss the playoffs again.

Isn’t this freaking AWESOME???

Can’t say I’ve ever seen a more snowflake post in my life. Reminds me of a teenager throwing a sarcastic tantrum. If the Griz punch it in at the end, do you type this up? Likely not. Losing sucks and we certainly had our opportunities. But the grass always seems to be greener for you. My support is all this program will get from me. Go Griz. FTC.

Not sure how it’s a snowflake post. Lots of reality, sure...But i agree: FTC.

 

[Dutch Lane]

I do know that Bobby was open with at least a few boosters in August telling them this season could be a bit of a struggle.

Little did we know he was talking about his own performance. Right?

I think the talent on the roster played a part also.

I think bobby’s Inability to make adjustments played a large part also.

What adjustments should have been made after they went up 22-7 at halftime. Please articulate with specificity what adjustments and when should they have been made if you can.

 

[Eriul]

Little did we know he was talking about his own performance. Right?

I think the talent on the roster played a part also.

I think bobby’s Inability to make adjustments played a large part also.

What adjustments should have been made after they went up 22-7 at halftime. Please articulate with specificity what adjustments and when should they have been made if you can.

Well the pressure seemed less in the second half on the defensive side of the ball. I could be wrong as I don’t have specific stats but... that’s basically the game changing thing. Our defensive side of the ball didn’t show up in the 2nd half and I’m not sure it’s all the players. Also, the o-line got smoked in the second half. Probably adjusting to the blitz schemes such as the corner blitz is probably a good idea. I don’t have tape and I can’t back up my points with stats but honestly I’m not going to bother to prove your point as being silly.


Strangely, I agree with AZ here. We took a HUGE step back this year and people can blame stitt all they want but there is no way stitt goes 6-5 this year.

That said, I’m willing to back Hauck into the future but he needs to get his arrogant head out of his ass. He’s chasing away players and he refuses to adjust, whether in the game or in reality. I think the last play was a great example of Bobby as a coach. He refused to change the play call. He will do it his way, live or die. I don’t think people understand that the dying option is VERY real and actually probable.

Since Hauck left here the first time he has been absolutely abysmal as a coach. I don’t think people are looking at the possibility that the program was so strong with him as a coach before that a bum off the street could have run it. For example, you can hire me as head coach of Alabama and I bet I can take the crimson tide to a few playoffs. Yes, Saban is one of the best coaches ever, but that program is built so high now that it’s idiot proof.

Let’s see if Hauck can build the program because he’s proved to be a bad football coach. But he has built Montana in the past into a power house

 

[Spanky2]

AZ, we get it that you hate Hauck. So what do you want Kent to do, fire him? Then what? Who becomes our new coach and how do we compensate him? Please outline your plan.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

I'm not "backing" anyone. I'm just agreeing you are an idiot, sometimes.

Bottom line, we fired Coach Stitt for less than this. From what I've heard some of the "big money" wasn't happy with Coach Stitt's results, are those same people happy now? That's a serious question. Can someone like PR, give us direct quotes from "the boosters"?

Stitt was fired because in Year 3, and with mostly his own players, he couldn't beat the Cats and make the playoffs. If Hauck is losing to the Cats and not making playoffs in Year 3, he may be gone too. However, he won't be doing that.

The Big Boosters whom I have talked to are still high on Bobby. They have seen a different team this year, one that played harder and worked very hard to win. This was noticeable from the first game.

So, the Big Money Boys think Coach Haucks 6-5 was better than Coach Haucks 7-4? Are any of them going to release a statement on how one few win and a loss to the Cats is better than 7-4 and a loss to the Cats. We have metric in Canada so I might be confused. I'd way rather be 7-4 than 6-5 but that's just me. Hey, I see a difference as well, we won fewer games.

Shit, I just realized Bobby did worse this year than Bob last year. I had posted that we traded 6-5 for 6-5, but spaced the fact Bob went 7-4 with a loss to #7 Washington, and got fired for it. Haha! What a world!

 

[SoldierGriz]

AZ, we get it that you hate Hauck. So what do you want Kent to do, fire him? Then what? Who becomes our new coach and how do we compensate him? Please outline your plan.

Posted this in another thread...Kent will NOT fire Bobby. He cannot survive 2 FB hirings and firings. If Bobby goes, so goes Kent. It's not going to happen.

AZ knows this. I think AZ's problem is he cheers for perennial loser Texas Tech, and is an Idaho grad. Ugh...his teams - including the Griz are certainly disappointing.

 

[Spanky2]

If AZ is a Idaho grad, he should be cheering for the mighty Vandals and remove himself from the Griz board.

 

[SoldierGriz]

My hunch is he coined the term "klingsuckers" for fans of the Texas Tech coach on Texas Tech message boards? AZ - True or nah?

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

Wow, Bobby pretty much accomplished the same in year one as Stitt did in year 3 even with several of Stitt's pampered, entitled players leaving.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Wow, Bobby pretty much accomplished the same in year one as Stitt did in year 3 even with several of Stitt's pampered, entitled players leaving.

Totally. Definitely no better. A little worse on the record. Same loss to the Bobcats. Definitely a lot worse than Stitt's first year, I don't think anyone would argue against that. But, I think the trajectory is good.

 

[Grizzoola]

Since Hauck left here the first time he has been absolutely abysmal as a coach. I don’t think people are looking at the possibility that the program was so strong with him as a coach before that a bum off the street could have run it. For example, you can hire me as head coach of Alabama and I bet I can take the crimson tide to a few playoffs. Yes, Saban is one of the best coaches ever, but that program is built so high now that it’s idiot proof.

I followed BH closely during his UNLV tenure, attending two of his home games. He played 5 FCS teams, 4 of which were BSC: Idaho (then FBS), NAU, SUU, and UNC. Here's his overall record and final scores of those 5 games:

2010: Record: 2-11 Lost to Idaho 7-30,

2011: Record: 2-11 Lost to SUU 16-41

2012: Record: 2-11 Lost to NAU 14-17

2013: Record: 7-6 Beat Western Ill. 38-7 Went to his first bowl game. Improvement due to his senior QB finally getting his head on straight, which is another story.

2014: Record: 2-11 Beat UNC 13-12

The amazing thing to me was that none of the BSC teams were FCS playoff teams. BH had beaten these teams consistency during his UM tenure, yet lost to them at UNLV. Most shocking was beating UNC by only one point. It may be too early in BH's second tenure at UM to judge him by this, and it may be too demanding that he did not both beat MSU and get to the playoffs in his first year back.

I only show that I'm questioning his ability to turn UM around, since he did not turn UNLV's program around. In all fairness to him, no coach could turn that program around. Many tried before and the now-hyped "savior" of the program, a highly successful HS coach, is doing barely better. So, my view is that with better booster and fan support at UM, he'll get the program back to where it was when he left.

 

[grizindabox]

Wow, Bobby pretty much accomplished the same in year one as Stitt did in year 3 even with several of Stitt's pampered, entitled players leaving.

Totally. Definitely no better. A little worse on the record. Same loss to the Bobcats. Definitely a lot worse than Stitt's first year, I don't think anyone would argue against that. But, I think the trajectory is good.

Maybe accurate CDA, but trajectory is difficult to define based on one reference point.

 

[grizindabox]

Since Hauck left here the first time he has been absolutely abysmal as a coach. I don’t think people are looking at the possibility that the program was so strong with him as a coach before that a bum off the street could have run it. For example, you can hire me as head coach of Alabama and I bet I can take the crimson tide to a few playoffs. Yes, Saban is one of the best coaches ever, but that program is built so high now that it’s idiot proof.

I followed BH closely during his UNLV tenure, attending two of his home games. He played 5 FCS teams, 4 of which were BSC: Idaho (then FBS), NAU, SUU, and UNC. Here's his overall record and final scores of those 5 games:

2010: Record: 2-11 Lost to Idaho 7-30,

2011: Record: 2-11 Lost to SUU 16-41

2012: Record: 2-11 Lost to NAU 14-17

2013: Record: 7-6 Beat Western Ill. 38-7 Went to his first bowl game. Improvement due to his senior QB finally getting his head on straight, which is another story.

2014: Record: 2-11 Beat UNC 13-12

The amazing thing to me was that none of the BSC teams were FCS playoff teams. BH had beaten these teams consistency during his UM tenure, yet lost to them at UNLV. Most shocking was beating UNC by only one point. It may be too early in BH's second tenure at UM to judge him by this, and it may be too demanding that he did not both beat MSU and get to the playoffs in his first year back.

I only show that I'm questioning his ability to turn UM around, since he did not turn UNLV's program around. In all fairness to him, no coach could turn that program around. Many tried before and the now-hyped "savior" of the program, a highly successful HS coach, is doing barely better. So, my view is that with better booster and fan support at UM, he'll get the program back to where it was when he left.

Quick question, who has turned UNLV around? Bobby is 1 of 4 coaches that took UNLV to a bowl game....ever. I get that he wasn't successful there, but no one has been....ever.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Wow, Bobby pretty much accomplished the same in year one as Stitt did in year 3 even with several of Stitt's pampered, entitled players leaving.

Totally. Definitely no better. A little worse on the record. Same loss to the Bobcats. Definitely a lot worse than Stitt's first year, I don't think anyone would argue against that. But, I think the trajectory is good.

Maybe accurate CDA, but trajectory is difficult to define based on one reference point.

I'm told the trajectory is good, and I choose to believe it. The players lost to the Bobcats much harder and tougher than they would have without Bobby.

 

[polsongrizz]

I get that you don’t like Hauck. Fine. But you cannot deny that Hauck does not have anywhere near the offensive or defensive line talent that he had the last time he was here. We will be fine once he addresses those two issues. And to be fair, he wasn’t playing not to lose, rather he kept attacking. The players once again were in position to put the game away despite their shortcomings at various positions and they pissed down their leg. This loss is on the players. Specifically sneed and Eastwood. Back to back series with a turnover, and the last coming on the goal line. That’s not on the f***ing coaches.

Who pissed it down their legs? Oh, that’s right...guys Bobby brought in. Areas he “addressed” already. While running off the Freshman of the year QB and all BSC RB because of his ego. Hopefully he doesn’t address the O-line and D-line areas similarly or we’ll see Sims and the Demming twins hit the bricks.

Yep, well done. Well done, indeed.

13 FUMBLES and 12 INTERCEPTIONS, quite the seasoned players we have. Way to go booby! :lol:

 

[AZGrizFan]

AZ, we get it that you hate Hauck. So what do you want Kent to do, fire him? Then what? Who becomes our new coach and how do we compensate him? Please outline your plan.

Posted this in another thread...Kent will NOT fire Bobby. He cannot survive 2 FB hirings and firings. If Bobby goes, so goes Kent. It's not going to happen.

AZ knows this. I think AZ's problem is he cheers for perennial loser Texas Tech, and is an Idaho grad. Ugh...his teams - including the Griz are certainly disappointing.

A) I have NEVER cheered for Idaho—except to lose
B) you’re damned right about tech. Thank god they’re becoming a terrific basketball school
C) Griz football has been my football salvation for 25 years and now this....I may have to go into rehab, bro!!

 

[AZGrizFan]

My hunch is he coined the term "klingsuckers" for fans of the Texas Tech coach on Texas Tech message boards? AZ - True or nah?

Hey now...don’t you be denigrating the king of Lubbock man!!