• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

THE MOST IGNORANT STATEMENT MADE ON E-GRIZ

Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Grisly Fan said:
I have my own nomination: JJ is an "alcohol-fueled sexual predator". Whether he is found guilty or not, this has to be one of the most ignorant and prejudiced statements I have ever read here.

Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

the inconsistencies in his story are piling up!

(sorry, couldn't help myself)
 
Washgrizfan1 said:
ben dover said:
"The sex was all from behind, and she was on her knees (and presumably hands or elbows). I don't understand how rape can occur this way" I have been reading this forum since it started and i think this is the most ignorant thing ever said on e-griz.

So please explain. There was no gun, knife, violence or threat. How do you think forcible rape occurred from behind? Could she have not layed flat? Could she have not pulled forward? How did he hold her up, or down? Wasn't the original comment just a question? "How did rape occur this way?" I'm actually curious myself how forcible rape occurred this way. It occurs to me that there might have been some level of cooperation for sex to have occurred this way.

Found this from an article entitled: "Does a Sexual Position Indicate Consent?" This is what a judge asked in a rape case:

"What shocked the victim most was when the judge questioned whether she was really raped since he found it “odd” that was she was on top of Escobar during the assault. The judge required the victim to recount, in detail, her position during the rape and explain how Escobar, who maintained the sex was consensual, was able to force himself on her.

“I know these are tough questions and I don’t like to have to ask them,” the judge told the victim, according to a July 31 transcript, released late last week. “It’s just you understand that most rapes take place with the man on top so he has complete control of the female.”

The case involved threats and perhaps force.

"The victim testified that she repeatedly fought her attacker, but that he wasn’t fazed by the blows to his face and was able to force himself on her. All the while, she said, Escobar threatened to put her “in the bayou,” claiming to have killed five people already and saying he’d do the same to her with a knife she believed he had in his pocket."

This below quote is from the author of the article:

"It is in fact true that the position the attacker used during his rape is not the most common one used."
 
ilovethecats said:
:lol:

one would think after reading this board that if a p.o.s. wanted to rape a girl, all he would have to do is find a girl who likes to have sex (because those girls can't get raped...they're just sluts) and do her from behind (because rape from behind is impossible)

classic stuff. :thumb:

You hope and pray that JJ is convicted. You are such a sicko, jaded by a childish addiction to a football rivalry that you disdain normal reason to foster your agenda. Maybe some day you, or a loved one, will have some tramp use the rape card the same way this chick did, to appease her bruised ego that a jock only wanted to harpoon her, and not be her boyfriend. Then, it will be funny to watch you do a 180.
 
Special K said:
ilovethecats said:
:lol:

one would think after reading this board that if a p.o.s. wanted to rape a girl, all he would have to do is find a girl who likes to have sex (because those girls can't get raped...they're just sluts) and do her from behind (because rape from behind is impossible)

classic stuff. :thumb:

You hope and pray that JJ is convicted. You are such a sicko, jaded by a childish addiction to a football rivalry that you disdain normal reason to foster your agenda. Maybe some day you, or a loved one, will have some tramp use the rape card the same way this chick did, to appease her bruised ego that a jock only wanted to harpoon her, and not be her boyfriend. Then, it will be funny to watch you do a 180.

um.... :?

not sure how to even respond.
 
ilovethecats said:
Special K said:
ilovethecats said:
:lol:

one would think after reading this board that if a p.o.s. wanted to rape a girl, all he would have to do is find a girl who likes to have sex (because those girls can't get raped...they're just sluts) and do her from behind (because rape from behind is impossible)

classic stuff. :thumb:

You hope and pray that JJ is convicted. You are such a sicko, jaded by a childish addiction to a football rivalry that you disdain normal reason to foster your agenda. Maybe some day you, or a loved one, will have some tramp use the rape card the same way this chick did, to appease her bruised ego that a jock only wanted to harpoon her, and not be her boyfriend. Then, it will be funny to watch you do a 180.

um.... :?

not sure how to even respond.

The truth is always sobering, eh?
 
Special K said:
ilovethecats said:
Special K said:
ilovethecats said:
:lol:

one would think after reading this board that if a p.o.s. wanted to rape a girl, all he would have to do is find a girl who likes to have sex (because those girls can't get raped...they're just sluts) and do her from behind (because rape from behind is impossible)

classic stuff. :thumb:

You hope and pray that JJ is convicted. You are such a sicko, jaded by a childish addiction to a football rivalry that you disdain normal reason to foster your agenda. Maybe some day you, or a loved one, will have some tramp use the rape card the same way this chick did, to appease her bruised ego that a jock only wanted to harpoon her, and not be her boyfriend. Then, it will be funny to watch you do a 180.

um.... :?

not sure how to even respond.

The truth is always sobering, eh?

no, it was just stupid. go read my posts. i have barely even commented on all the shit you got going in missoula. and i surely don't hope and pray anyone is convicted if they didn't commit a crime.

i know that you have only been around a month or so. but your description of me is laughable and i bet many griz fans on this board would back me up. i don't comment on crap i don't know about. i don't get worked up over football players or teams. i don't have an agenda. and i work in social service so i'm VERY sympathetic in regards to situations like these....

please do a little research before posting or at the very least watch what you say because you really sound ridiculous. how you came to the conclusion you did after reading my post is baffling. :lol:
 
ilovethecats said:
Special K said:
ilovethecats said:
Special K said:
You hope and pray that JJ is convicted. You are such a sicko, jaded by a childish addiction to a football rivalry that you disdain normal reason to foster your agenda. Maybe some day you, or a loved one, will have some tramp use the rape card the same way this chick did, to appease her bruised ego that a jock only wanted to harpoon her, and not be her boyfriend. Then, it will be funny to watch you do a 180.

um.... :?

not sure how to even respond.

The truth is always sobering, eh?

no, it was just stupid. go read my posts. i have barely even commented on all the shit you got going in missoula. and i surely don't hope and pray anyone is convicted if they didn't commit a crime.

i know that you have only been around a month or so. but your description of me is laughable and i bet many griz fans on this board would back me up. i don't comment on crap i don't know about. i don't get worked up over football players or teams. i don't have an agenda. and i work in social service so i'm VERY sympathetic in regards to situations like these....

please do a little research before posting or at the very least watch what you say because you really sound ridiculous. how you came to the conclusion you did after reading my post is baffling. :lol:
Please. :roll:

You're an MSU fan, which means you're basically a nazi child molester. And there's no reasoning your way out of it. :geek:
 
One time I might have mentioned, in passing, that the black athelete is better, because they were bred that way..

Jimmy the Greek
 
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Grisly Fan said:
I have my own nomination: JJ is an "alcohol-fueled sexual predator". Whether he is found guilty or not, this has to be one of the most ignorant and prejudiced statements I have ever read here.

Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.
 
spokaneman said:
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Grisly Fan said:
I have my own nomination: JJ is an "alcohol-fueled sexual predator". Whether he is found guilty or not, this has to be one of the most ignorant and prejudiced statements I have ever read here.

Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.

Well, that leaves out the part in the rest of her statement, "he" claimed he had had a couple of beers, and that was his excuse for not wanting to drive. It also leaves out the rest of the statement "When she picked him up and brought him back to her house, she did not think he had been drinking."

http://missoulian.com/motion-to-dismiss-rape-charge-against-jordan-johnson/pdf_cf57f39a-e18a-11e1-b7cd-001a4bcf887a.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Gee, that's kind of an important part to leave out, don'cha think? It's kind of an intentional omission, don'cha think?

Questioning at the trial of the roommate disclosed only that the roommate thought JJ was "quiet, shy," and offered no testimony relating to any perception of alcohol or "drunkeness" whatsoever. And neither did Jane Doe.

Now, notice the amazing silence by those who object to opinions based on trial testimony, when an opinion negative to JJ is offered, which is NOT supported by trial testimony. They go completely silent. Then, it's OK.
 
spokaneman said:
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Grisly Fan said:
I have my own nomination: JJ is an "alcohol-fueled sexual predator". Whether he is found guilty or not, this has to be one of the most ignorant and prejudiced statements I have ever read here.

Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.

Gotta know all the facts. She (the accuser) apparently didn't know he (JJ) had been drinking and she (the accuser) testified to that. He (JJ) had her (the accuser) come pick him (JJ) up but apparently never told her (the accuser) that he (JJ) had been drinking.
 
BDizzle said:
spokaneman said:
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.

Gotta know all the facts. She (the accuser) apparently didn't know he (JJ) had been drinking and she (the accuser) testified to that. He (JJ) had her (the accuser) come pick him (JJ) up but apparently never told her (the accuser) that he (JJ) had been drinking.
No, this is wrong. JJ told Jane Doe he did not want to drive as he had had a "couple of beers." She went to pick him up, but didn't think he had actually been drinking.
 
spokaneman said:
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Grisly Fan said:
I have my own nomination: JJ is an "alcohol-fueled sexual predator". Whether he is found guilty or not, this has to be one of the most ignorant and prejudiced statements I have ever read here.

Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.

My information came from listening to the testimony in the court room. Your information came from an inaccurate and incomplete Missoulian article. It looks like you ought to obtain your information from better sources.
 
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Washgrizfan1 said:
spokaneman said:
Uuummmm - as you state "IF he is found guilty"..... he is most definitely IS a sexual predator!! In addition, he was DRUNK at the time!! I am not arguing one way or the other but those are just the facts...

Both the accuser and her roommate testified that they were not aware that he had been drinking at all. He certainly wasn't drunk.

Sigh..... :( ... This is what happens when you get your news from the EGRIZ forum....

Here.. please try to keep up!!
http://missoulian.com/news/local/grizzly-qb-jordan-johnson-charged-with-rape/article_a592856c-db62-11e1-96b4-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They decided to watch a movie at her house, and she picked him up because he’d been drinking and didn’t want to drive, according to the affidavit.

My information came from listening to the testimony in the court room. Your information came from an inaccurate and incomplete Missoulian article. It looks like you ought to obtain your information from better sources.

Ya... because sworn affidavits that are the backbone of our judicial system are completely inaccurate!!! :oops: :oops: :roll:
 
Summary of UMGriz Responses:

Poster: The weather is partly cloudy today
UMGriz75: No, you are wrong. Who appointed you the weather hall monitor?

Poster: I have an opinion about the JJ case
UMGriz75: Unless it follows mine verbatim, you are wrong.

Poster: It is ok to agree to disagree
UMGriz75: No, you are wrong.
 
spokaneman said:
Ya... because sworn affidavits that are the backbone of our judicial system are completely inaccurate!!! :oops: :oops: :roll:
This is the sworn affidavit in question:

SUZY BOYLAN, Assistant Chief Deputy County Attorney of Missoula County, Montana, being first duly sworn, moves the Court for Leave to File an Information charging the above-named Defendant with allegedly committing the offense of SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITHOUT CONSENT ...

The Motion is based upon the following facts which have been obtained from reports of law enforcement officers which, if true, I believe, constitute sufficient probable cause to justify the filing of the charges. The facts from those reports are as follows: ...

Defendant asked Jane Doe to pick him up, as he had been drinking alcohol and did not want to drive.

DATED this 31 st day of July, 2012. /s/ Suzy Boylan

http://missoulian.com/jordan-johnson-charges/pdf_8f065aa8-db62-11e1-bd9d-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I hope that helps.
 
uofmman1122 said:
Please. :roll:

You're an MSU fan, which means you're basically a nazi child molester. And there's no reasoning your way out of it. :geek:

shit. :oops:

i always forget that. i take back my entire response.... :cry:
 
Jerry Punch said:
Summary of UMGriz Responses:

Poster: The weather is partly cloudy today
UMGriz75: No, you are wrong. Who appointed you the weather hall monitor?

Poster: I have an opinion about the JJ case
UMGriz75: Unless it follows mine verbatim, you are wrong.

Poster: It is ok to agree to disagree
UMGriz75: No, you are wrong.

Boy you are a prevaricator of the worst kind. You forgot that he backed up his "opinions" with actual trial testimony. Just admit you are, at best, wrong and, at worst, a liar. Then leave this forum.
 
Back
Top