statler & waldorf said:
No Pulitzer Prize for the Krak.
Florio would be in line for the PP ahead of him anyway. Krakauer basically just took her "reporting", half truths, insinuations and themes, and expanded on them. He lost me when he said that the Dean was the big hero, along with Florio and the Missoulian. When I read that, I sent a text to my friends: "OMG, I think I just got screwed (by paying $28.75 for this book).
And Pabst, Van Valkenberg, Paoli, Milt D. and the probably the police chief are the villins, and at times certain policeman and prosecutors are also the villians.
Several of the accusers who talked to Krakauer are the same people who previously talked to Florio, and which she and the Missoulian have written about numerous times. (The JJ accuser appears not to have talked to Krakauer. More power to her.) The Book says Florio and the Missoulian led to the DOJ investigation. It looks to me that this very small group of accusers, and Florio and her reporting, were probably the driving force for the DOJ investigation. Note that even the Book and Krakauer in his press are admitting that Missoula had/has a lower sexual assault complaint rate than comparable cities; and Pabst provided national statistics to the Missoulian showing that Missoula prosecuted sexual assaults complaints/cases at a higher rate than the national average.
Sure, no city or school ever investigates and prosecutes anything, including sexual assault, perfectly, and mistakes are made, and sure there is improvement in the investigation and prosecution of sexual assaults in Missoula now, and better cooperation between the school and the city. However, it is astounding how much damage a very small group of complainers (some of which was probably legitimate and some of which was probably just sour grapes), and an unfair and biased reporter and newspaper, can do and has done to Missoula and the University of Montana.
Another thing I noticed was the number of participants from the JJ case who were involved in the other case studies in the Book. The rape nurse, whom I thought was thoroughly discredited by the JJ expert and the defense lawyers, was involved in at least 3 of the case studies in the Book.
Football took a good beating. I don't know how many times Krakauer says football and players were "entitled". However, I kept thinking that of all the allegations and insinuations, from Florio and Krakauer in the past almost 3.5 years, the net result is: Donaldson, one player who didn't get a lawyer expelled, and, according to the Book, a couple players who were apparently not in school told not to return to UM. I have been told that no one player who got a lawyer to fight his UM case was expelled. Krakauer would want us to believe the low numbers was because of the bad investigation/prosecution in Missoula, but I know many of us on the board know a lot about many of these situations, including the JJ case, and it is just plain not true that poor investigation/prosecution led to these very low numbers. The incidents just didn't merit prosecution or conviction. And I don't remember any incidents or even rumors of football players involved in sexual assault in Missoula in the past several decades.
The treatment of JJ was very unfair in the Book. Krakauer just presents things favorable to the accuser and omits or barely mentions things favorable to JJ. My guess is that of the top dozen or so things favorable to JJ, Krakauer completely omits or significantly downplays about 10 of them. Jeez, after a two-week trial, I think the jury was out 138 minutes (for lunch, picking a foreman, deliberating and deciding) before the unanimous not-guilty verdict. The one juror who talked to him said she believe the jury reached the right decision, but Krakauer still had to discuss and try to make a big deal of the other things she told him.
After all the nasty and untrue stuff he said about Paoli and Pabst, I'd love to see either or both of them get a shot at him in court.
Van Valkenberg got his share of negative comments too. I don't really know Fred, but I liked how he stood up the DOJ, because I believe he was correct in asserting that they didn't have legal authority to investigation the County Attorneys office and saying that allowing them to overstep their authority would be dangerous precedent. A funny story from his retirement party. MT AG Fox spoke very positively of Fred. However, at the end, he wished Fred well in retirement but said he didn't think that Fred should run a PR firm.