Damien Lillard might be better but I'm not a basketball fan.Just voted into the Big Sky Conference Hall of Fame.
My question: Why now?
Haslam: “One of the best players in the history of the Big Sky.”
My question: Who was better?
If I were Richardson’s family I’d tell them to go f’ themselves.
Maybe righting or wrong? Or would you rather it just stay wrong.Typical of the graceless clumsy way a second-rate conference operates. Does Lillard have to die 50 years from now to achieve this modest honor of being the best of a second-rate conference?
Why did Sugar? Or Sojurner? Why now?
I agree. It’s a shame they waited this long and he has passed away and didn’t receive recognition in person. But I bet with all the trials that he overcame he rarely thought about it. But yes why did it take so long ?If you’re going to “right a wrong,” how about identifying the “wrong.”
In 2013, per his Wiki page, Richardson was voted in 2013 as the 31st best male athlete in Big Sky history.
Gimme a break! Anybody who saw him play knows that’s absurd.
Lillard blossomed as a pro. As far as the Big Sky goes, I’m not sure he was better than Richardson.
The Big Sky did him wrong. Ass backward, second rate conference, that’s the “wrong.”
Same could be said of Willie Sojourner.I agree. It’s a shame they waited this long and he has passed away and didn’t receive recognition in person. But I bet with all the trials that he overcame he rarely thought about it. But yes why did it take so long ?
Because Hall of Fames like to induct only a few a year so they get some spotlight and recognition.Typical of the graceless clumsy way a second-rate conference operates. Does Lillard have to die 50 years from now to achieve this modest honor of being the best of a second-rate conference?
Why did Sugar? Or Sojurner? Why now?