• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Stitt's Ego/Inflexibility

Status
Not open for further replies.
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
I also did a poll....and my stats from such poll are 97% of egriz posters that replied believe 75 is a retired number cruncher that has never played the game....the other 3% just thought he was a twit...take it for what it is worth...but stats never lie...
That's kind of all you've got, and kind of who you are, isn't it?

No need to take it personally. You are an idiot without my personal opinion having anything to do with it. :)

All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....
 
grizindabox said:
All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....
I am always impressed by somebody who fabricates a personal dispute out of data, then hopes that young players screw up in order to vindicate his personal vendetta and his insipid agenda.

You must be a wonderful human being.

If Makena starts, I wish him the best. If Brady starts, I wish him the best. Go Griz!
 
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....
I am always impressed by somebody who fabricates a personal dispute out of data, then hopes that young players screw up in order to vindicate his personal vendetta and his insipid agenda.

You must be a wonderful human being.

If Makena starts, I wish him the best. If Brady starts, I wish him the best. Go Griz!

I am sure that you are a wonderful person and even if I doubted it, you would use some stats to prove it.....but even though you are wonderful, it has become obvious that you have never played the game....had to drop the PRism...

It is also become very apparent that you can't reason with stupid....I have no stats to verify that although....
 
grizindabox said:
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....
I am always impressed by somebody who fabricates a personal dispute out of data, then hopes that young players screw up in order to vindicate his personal vendetta and his insipid agenda.

You must be a wonderful human being.

If Makena starts, I wish him the best. If Brady starts, I wish him the best. Go Griz!

I am sure that you are a wonderful person and even if I doubted it, you would use some stats to prove it.....but even though you are wonderful, it has become obvious that you have never played the game....had to drop the PRism...

It is also become very apparent that you can't reason with stupid....I have no stats to verify that although....

Look Box. Get off of 75's case. If not, I am going to start kicking your ass again on the board. Regardless of what you or 75 thinks, Brady is the guy.
 
grizindabox said:
It is also become very apparent that you can't reason with stupid....I have no stats to verify that although....
And you would, typically, argue with them if they contradicted your preferred narrative, because that's what "stupid" people just do.

Congrats. You are one of many who manage to conflate your perception of your opinion with someone trying to discuss something as mundane as "stats," which always irritates those for whom their self-regard exceeds their capacity for self-embarrassment. I really don't care what you think. You have demonstrated it is mostly uninformed opinion, such as your claim that the ISU game was "slowed down" when in fact the data shows that it was speeded up, and above average in both numbers of plays and time per play. You were simply wrong. I emphasize the "simply" part.

And when you stub your head on stuff like that, it always degenerates into a pissing match. Sorry. Don't be stupid and it won't happen. Don't fabricate false claims like that one and it won't happen. Don't wish for UM student athletes to fail to serve your personal vanity, and it won't happen.

But, somehow, I doubt you can.
 
So what I take out of this discussion is we are talentless and Stitt can't coach. Hello New coach in 2018. Don't believe either is absolute. This team is underperforming . Why, a coach finding his way. Will he? Coach's adjust. Can he? Point of the thread.
 
XxSpectrexX said:
You know what I can't stand??? Posters on here that assume you can come to a program with a new playbook and the old players who complimented another system and think it won't take any time to see success at any level. Stitt is a effin' mastermind at what he does and when he gets the players he recruits we will see some change. Keep in mind that he, like any coach has targeted some kids we won't get and will have to take what the good Lord offers us... but the difference is, they will at least have been identified as desirable by his program. All that talk of the big show...this is FCS people, not FBS. Even some FBS programs suck, so just sit down and wait like the rest of us. It's coming.

Agreed. When I read posts about how bad this season is going (frankly if we had gotten rolled by NDSU this wouldn't be happening) and suggesting Stitt has failed, I hear several choruses of Queen's "I Want it All" ringing in my head:

"I want it all, I want it all, I want it all, and I want it now
I want it all, I want it all, I want it all, and I want it now"
 
PlayerRep said:
grizindabox said:
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....
I am always impressed by somebody who fabricates a personal dispute out of data, then hopes that young players screw up in order to vindicate his personal vendetta and his insipid agenda.

You must be a wonderful human being.

If Makena starts, I wish him the best. If Brady starts, I wish him the best. Go Griz!

I am sure that you are a wonderful person and even if I doubted it, you would use some stats to prove it.....but even though you are wonderful, it has become obvious that you have never played the game....had to drop the PRism...

It is also become very apparent that you can't reason with stupid....I have no stats to verify that although....

Look Box. Get off of 75's case. If not, I am going to start kicking your ass again on the board. Regardless of what you or 75 thinks, Brady is the guy.

I laughed....PR...it is also funny since I believe Gus is the guy but according to 75 and his stats....Simis is the guy....Stats are fun....you know all about that PR....with your love of stats, how come you are not trying to push Simis as the man....75 has proved how the stats back up that train of thought....asking for a friend...
 
"It is what it is"

If we had a super stud of a QB and a big tough OL we would be sitting on the top of the Big Sky, but....

So we have a good group of players working hard to be a play-off team and that is what we have along with new coaches and two tough games coming up. Will it be whine or wine after the regular season?

All Griz fans want us to win the last two games! Pass the damn ball on first down and we win going away and that is the advice I would give Stitt. I am sure he would listen. Meanwhile back at Wa Griz, because it is what it is!
Go Griz!
 
Who most consistently throws the deep ball with the fewest turnovers? It seems that's what it takes to beat EWU.
 
grizindabox said:
I laughed....PR...it is also funny since I believe Gus is the guy but according to 75 and his stats....Simis is the guy....Stats are fun....you know all about that PR....with your love of stats, how come you are not trying to push Simis as the man....75 has proved how the stats back up that train of thought....asking for a friend...
God, you are a classic tool. When you get done putting words into everyone else's mouth because its easier for you to trash what they didn't say, as opposed to what they did actually say, claiming that the ISU game "slowed down" the play because you don't know what you are talking about, denigrating the team and the players, and hoping that a young starting QB fails so that you can vindicate your malicious attacks on him, perhaps you can then reflect on what I, in particular, actually did say:
UMGriz75: I don't know who the "better" QB is, because as I noted, the implementation of the "Stitt Stategy" has been wildly variable, with wildly variable results for the QBs.
I know, it's easy to miss stuff like that when you are in overdrive fabricating an alternative universe.
 
tnt said:
Who most consistently throws the deep ball with the fewest turnovers? It seems that's what it takes to beat EWU.

I see your point but I respectfully disagree. MSU already proved that it is not a great strategy to attempt to outscore EWU. UM's defense has to play its best game and get some stops and take-aways (see the NAU win over EWU last weekend). Griz defenders must play fast, steady, assignment-strong, and cannot miss tackles. EWU beat UM twice last year and it was not really due to the Griz QB position.
 
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
I laughed....PR...it is also funny since I believe Gus is the guy but according to 75 and his stats....Simis is the guy....Stats are fun....you know all about that PR....with your love of stats, how come you are not trying to push Simis as the man....75 has proved how the stats back up that train of thought....asking for a friend...
God, you are a classic tool. When you get done putting words into everyone else's mouth because its easier for you to trash what they didn't say, as opposed to what they did actually say, claiming that the ISU game "slowed down" the play because you don't know what you are talking about, denigrating the team and the players, and hoping that a young starting QB fails so that you can vindicate your malicious attacks on him, perhaps you can then reflect on what I, in particular, actually did say:
UMGriz75: I don't know who the "better" QB is, because as I noted, the implementation of the "Stitt Stategy" has been wildly variable, with wildly variable results for the QBs.
I know, it's easy to miss stuff like that when you are in overdrive fabricating an alternative universe.

Grizzy75, you do realize that the TOP you posted for the UND game was incorrect and box posted the correct number. Granted using your time per play math, ISU was 19.26 seconds and UND was slower at 22.53 seconds, but this does not account for plays when the clock was dead, and just by knowing there were 9 more incomplete passes thrown by Simis at ISU, it would be natural to assume that the ISU number was probably even closer to the number from the UND game. I hate when stats screw with an argument.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
Granted using your time per play math, ISU was 19.26 seconds and UND was slower at 22.53 seconds, but this does not account for plays when the clock was dead, and just by knowing there were 9 more incomplete passes thrown by Simis at ISU, it would be natural to assume that the ISU number was probably even closer to the number from the UND game. I hate when stats screw with an argument.
... "does not account," .... "clock was dead" .... "natural to assume" ... "probably" .... "closer" ...

You may hate it when "stats screw with an argument," but news flash, "probably" is not a "stat." It requires you to make an "assumption" of time outside of the time of play, and in that case, then you must do it for both games, including game time-outs, TV time-outs, injury delays, moving the chains, times for review, etc, etc, etc.

Go ahead. Do it. Blind us with your intelligence. Identify and quantify your "assumptions" for both games.
 
UMGriz75 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
Granted using your time per play math, ISU was 19.26 seconds and UND was slower at 22.53 seconds, but this does not account for plays when the clock was dead, and just by knowing there were 9 more incomplete passes thrown by Simis at ISU, it would be natural to assume that the ISU number was probably even closer to the number from the UND game. I hate when stats screw with an argument.
... "does not account," .... "clock was dead" .... "natural to assume" ... "probably" .... "closer" ...

You may hate it when "stats screw with an argument," but news flash, "probably" is not a "stat." It requires you to make an "assumption" of time outside of the time of play, and in that case, then you must do it for both games, including game time-outs, TV time-outs, injury delays, etc, etc, etc.

Go ahead. Do it. Blind us with your intelligence.

I love it. Someone provides info and/or factors that would influence your argument and all you do is spout off a bunch of gibberish instead of conceding the fact that the pace of each game was probably pretty similar, not exact but fairly similar. Of course with your keen sense of time, you could probably tell that the Griz were running plays about 2 seconds faster at ISU than against UND, but I would wager to guess that everyone sensed that the overall tempo for each game was very similar. The point is, it was not a 10-15 second difference on average, it was 2-3 seconds on average. It is true that all the things you noted do slow down the tempo, but does that really help your argument that the tempo of the UND game was so much slower than the tempo of the ISU game? I think not. You are just to bullheaded to admit you may be wrong or someone else may be correct.
 
grizindabox said:
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
I also did a poll....and my stats from such poll are 97% of egriz posters that replied believe 75 is a retired number cruncher that has never played the game....the other 3% just thought he was a twit...take it for what it is worth...but stats never lie...
That's kind of all you've got, and kind of who you are, isn't it?

No need to take it personally. You are an idiot without my personal opinion having anything to do with it. :)

All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....

Classic "Griz in a sandbox" tactics. When his middle of the road, non-committal pronouncements are questioned and his faux clever replies fail, he resorts to personal attacks and name calling; "Never played the game"..."Twit"..."Idiot"..."Stupid". Wanna waste your time? Comment on the posts from Teddy in the sandbox. :lol:
 
Here's how ego maniacal and inflexible Stitt is:

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ajmazzolini/status/664499813723979776[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ajmazzolini/status/664500061070430208[/tweet]

Such an inflexible guy.....
 
Stanley said:
grizindabox said:
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
I also did a poll....and my stats from such poll are 97% of egriz posters that replied believe 75 is a retired number cruncher that has never played the game....the other 3% just thought he was a twit...take it for what it is worth...but stats never lie...
That's kind of all you've got, and kind of who you are, isn't it?

No need to take it personally. You are an idiot without my personal opinion having anything to do with it. :)

All good...I am looking forward to Simis starting and playing because I am very confident that his performance will not be favorable to your statistical argument....and this is based on actually analyzing his actual play...something it has become very apparent that you are not able to do.....

Classic "Griz in a sandbox" tactics. When his middle of the road, non-committal pronouncements are questioned and his faux clever replies fail, he resorts to personal attacks and name calling; "Never played the game"..."Twit"..."Idiot"..."Stupid". Wanna waste your time? Comment on the posts from Teddy in the sandbox. :lol:

Stanley...you changed your avatar....
 
MrTitleist said:
Here's how ego maniacal and inflexible Stitt is:

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ajmazzolini/status/664499813723979776[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ajmazzolini/status/664500061070430208[/tweet]

Such an inflexible guy.....

If that is the case....75 has done statistical research that proves the base offense is not as good as the adapted offense...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top