UMGriz75
Well-known member
"Ad nauseum?" How many times have I -- or anyone for that matter -- referred to the actual CSM record? It is interesting that you consider that reference a "negative" reference. Ooops!!casewinter13 said:Sometimes facts can be positive, and not even considered "hype". I'm sure you annoy the shit out of Havre because the only kind of "objective" "facts" you tend to recite ad nauseam in relation to Stitt are the negative ones. Unless you think Haslam is a complete buffoon, I'll bet there were some down right positive "facts" related to Stitt's coaching history that would make him worth hiring. But, who knows, maybe ol Haslam himself got himself wrapped up in the "hype".
I understand being a counter balance in a debate, playing devil's advocate. But when that's the only role you tend to play, don't act surprised when people assume you don't particularly like Stitt. And tossing in the occasional "...blah blah blah I'm sure he's a smart guy" doesn't really throw anyone off your scent.
But still, how many "references?" Twice? What is your definition of "ad nauseum?" Anytime you read what you don't like because you are too busy enjoying your pom poms? It is a small definition then.
Generally, my few comments have been in response to manifold comments that the record there was "a miracle," "triumphant" and "extraordinary."
Correct me if I am wrong.
You obviously chose to ignore the positive -- precisely accurate -- things I wrote. Most of those, were, in fact, references I made to perceptions by those whom I specifically characterized as "credible" FBS coaches. I used that word. "Credible." What do you think I meant to do by characterizing those observations as "credible?"UMGriz75 said:The attention he has gotten from well-known coaches has been in regard to his ability to innovate "plays" and the testimony of credible coaches is that he is an innovative "offensive play" designer.
Indeed, my characterization was better than yours of the sources of the comments.
Your choice to ignore those comments is, in fact, precisely calibrated to throw readers off of "your" scent.
Aren't they?
Why is that?
And no, "I am not surprised" that rabid, irrational, mindless, cheerleader sports fans need to reinvent history to validate their own needs. Fine. Get a sports bra and pom poms. And for those of you that need the reinforcement, Go Cubs!