This is so stupid on BOTH sides. Obviously BIg G's rants about Hauck vs Stitt are getting annoying, but why do others take the bait? Why do others have to BASH Hauck to justify Stitt? I CAN PROMISE that Hauck's record at UNLV or his prior record at Montana HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH why Bob Stitt was hired. There is no correlation to what kind of coach BH was and is (and he was GREAT imo), and Stitt being hired. Kent made a choice. Big G I can ignore because his ramblings are inane, but I just don't understand the stupid Hauck bashing to refute what he's saying. It's stupid and senseless.