RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
You got a link to that requirement??
RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
hunt-ducks said:RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
F-him, and the horse-face he road in on...........................
grizfnz said:RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
You got a link to that requirement??
RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
Hoops watcher said:RayWill said:Biden's newly announced mandate goes into effect tomorrow and requires all sports arenas nationwide to require proof of vaccination to enter.
I believe that was a request if I heard right live. AFAIK no law has been passed giving him such authority yet.
RayWill said:Hoops watcher said:I believe that was a request if I heard right live. AFAIK no law has been passed giving him such authority yet.
Ah good to know. It was not real clear when he was speaking. I know he is mandating the vaccine for all companies with 100 employees or more through OSHA
RayWill said:Hoops watcher said:I believe that was a request if I heard right live. AFAIK no law has been passed giving him such authority yet.
Ah good to know. It was not real clear when he was speaking. I know he is mandating the vaccine for all companies with 100 employees or more through OSHA
A lot of "required" in that link from a wishful dictator, but the football stadium is below. "calling on".RayWill said:
Bertram said:Officially allowed this seasonEverettGriz said:I don't believe so.
That raises another question, though: Has there been any change to the snake policy at WaGRIZ?
![]()
Cuervohola said:He can't mandate anything, that violates the 10th Amendment. The Libs love to preach about how they love the Constitution, though. Every single time they speak, like the abortion issue in Texas... "The Republicans are violating the Constitution"... Uhhhh No.
The mandates for private employers will be in courts longer than Covid 19 exists... Covid 23 will exist of course. Then again, the Supreme Court could strike it down whenever they want, or Obama could just put the requirement in the Budget Bill that's 4800 pages.
I like our chances of remaining sane at the State level.dsprout said:Cuervohola said:He can't mandate anything, that violates the 10th Amendment. The Libs love to preach about how they love the Constitution, though. Every single time they speak, like the abortion issue in Texas... "The Republicans are violating the Constitution"... Uhhhh No.
The mandates for private employers will be in courts longer than Covid 19 exists... Covid 23 will exist of course. Then again, the Supreme Court could strike it down whenever they want, or Obama could just put the requirement in the Budget Bill that's 4800 pages.
The Supreme Court has ruled on this previously, so it will take some serious legal action to change course. But it does appear the individual state may have the final say.
“Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.”
The 10th amendment to the constitution is also decisively clear in it.dsprout said:Cuervohola said:He can't mandate anything, that violates the 10th Amendment. The Libs love to preach about how they love the Constitution, though. Every single time they speak, like the abortion issue in Texas... "The Republicans are violating the Constitution"... Uhhhh No.
The mandates for private employers will be in courts longer than Covid 19 exists... Covid 23 will exist of course. Then again, the Supreme Court could strike it down whenever they want, or Obama could just put the requirement in the Budget Bill that's 4800 pages.
The Supreme Court has ruled on this previously, so it will take some serious legal action to change course. But it does appear the individual state may have the final say.
“Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.”
kemajic said:I like our chances of remaining sane at the State level.dsprout said:The Supreme Court has ruled on this previously, so it will take some serious legal action to change course. But it does appear the individual state may have the final say.
“Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.”