last year's departed players for this year's newcomers?
strait, martin and rundles for...
selvig, taylor, johnson, mcgillis and banny?
let's break it down into three parts:
taylor for martin--close, but i think taylor will be bigger and better, even as a sophomore.
johnson for rundles. johnson still has to prove himself but based on rundles's performance last year, this is a no-brainer.
that leaves selvig, mcgillis and banny for strait. here you're giving up one of our all-time bests while getting in return athleticism, height and depth. i say, if mcgillis is as good as advertised and we get solid contributions from selvig and banny, this might be an even trade all by itself.
which means overall, you got the best of the trade. and just as a good trade is supposed to do, we're now a better team.
aren't we?
strait, martin and rundles for...
selvig, taylor, johnson, mcgillis and banny?
let's break it down into three parts:
taylor for martin--close, but i think taylor will be bigger and better, even as a sophomore.
johnson for rundles. johnson still has to prove himself but based on rundles's performance last year, this is a no-brainer.
that leaves selvig, mcgillis and banny for strait. here you're giving up one of our all-time bests while getting in return athleticism, height and depth. i say, if mcgillis is as good as advertised and we get solid contributions from selvig and banny, this might be an even trade all by itself.
which means overall, you got the best of the trade. and just as a good trade is supposed to do, we're now a better team.
aren't we?