Maybe there should be quiet and dead periods on egriz....
UMGriz75 said:If you "got it," then why try to keep claiming that you do?grizpack said:You don't like Stitt as coach at UM. We all get it. Over and Over and Over.
But, why not answer the question then? How does recruiting for the Colorado School of Mines translate to FCS? You must know, right? Because it's "anti-Stitt" to simply point that out?
UMGriz75 said:Ursus1 said:Not releasing info on coaching hires, promotions can be seen as a program in disarray. Watch the ESPN ticker, new coaching roles are happening all the time and being announced. Unless you fear the announcement is a sign of a poor hiring ?
Too, this is all new. Stitt has never recruited before where he is able to actually recruit genuine football athletes from a large population pool. He's a first timer at all this. This is the least experienced coach, from the standpoint of recruiting, that UM has ever had.
maroonandsilver said:Good Grief! The coaches are scattered all over on this last weekend of recruiting before the dead period. Give-em a chance to get back to Missoula, maybe Stitt wants to meet with some/all in the same room before decisions are made, or made public. The day Ty announced his decision to leave, Stitt said the the DC coach would be announced shortly. It has been 6 days. that is still "shortly"
Jayzuz. Some of you are like little girls whose teen poster idol just got criticized for singing off-key. Grow up just a tad.griz4life said:I'm remember Bob Stitt recruiting in New York the week before Montana hired him. If you can't stop making shit up, maybe you should find another team to troll.
I am intrigued. I look at a recruiting methodology and experience, and the responses consist of ad hominem attacks. Pull down your dresses girls and stop running in circles screaming. You know, "without emotion."astutegriz said:Wow, 75 is the most narcissistic poster I've ever read, which is impressive given the on-line competition. If you sit back and watch without emotion, disabilities like this are simply fascinating to observe.
Everyone always fails to mention the recruits that go to places for academic reasons. By your logic Stanford University would never win a game. Sometimes coaches do well at schools with high academics and terrible at state universities. Have you ever heard of Tyrone Willingham?grizindabox said:Maybe this is just me....but with the limitations due to academics that Stitt had at CSM......wouldn't that mean he has more experience....you know...since he had to dig deeper into the population pool to find football players....
UMGriz75 said:I am intrigued. I look at a recruiting methodology and experience, and the responses consist of ad hominem attacks. Pull down your dresses girls and stop running in circles screaming. You know, "without emotion."astutegriz said:Wow, 75 is the most narcissistic poster I've ever read, which is impressive given the on-line competition. If you sit back and watch without emotion, disabilities like this are simply fascinating to observe.
Thank you for your gratuitous and far ranging ad hominem attack.horribilisfan8184 said:BS. You criticize every move you don't agree with, a tall order for someone who's not inside the tent, and has none of the facts behind the scene. Since you don't want to accept or understand or trust his methods, all you have is complaint and denigration. And absence of any self-reflection.
UMGriz75 said:Thank you for your gratuitous and far ranging ad hominem attack.horribilisfan8184 said:BS. You criticize every move you don't agree with, a tall order for someone who's not inside the tent, and has none of the facts behind the scene. Since you don't want to accept or understand or trust his methods, all you have is complaint and denigration. And absence of any self-reflection.
And this has to do with the thread topic and Stitt's recruiting history of players and coaches at "Mines," how?
Do you think they are equal challenges?
Coach Ash?Triwest said:UMGriz75 said:Thank you for your gratuitous and far ranging ad hominem attack.horribilisfan8184 said:BS. You criticize every move you don't agree with, a tall order for someone who's not inside the tent, and has none of the facts behind the scene. Since you don't want to accept or understand or trust his methods, all you have is complaint and denigration. And absence of any self-reflection.
And this has to do with the thread topic and Stitt's recruiting history of players and coaches at "Mines," how?
Do you think they are equal challenges?
Actually he did recruit solid players at Mines and had to reject some very good players who wanted to play for him but did not meet the requirements for the school. As far as coaches go he hired coaches that were very good teachers of the game. (For those on here who know who I am they know I have been in the coaching field a very long time.)
UMGriz75 said:Thank you for your gratuitous and far ranging ad hominem attack.horribilisfan8184 said:BS. You criticize every move you don't agree with, a tall order for someone who's not inside the tent, and has none of the facts behind the scene. Since you don't want to accept or understand or trust his methods, all you have is complaint and denigration. And absence of any self-reflection.
And this has to do with the thread topic and Stitt's recruiting history of players and coaches at "Mines," how?
Do you think they are equal challenges?
indian-outlaw said:Everyone always fails to mention the recruits that go to places for academic reasons. By your logic Stanford University would never win a game. Sometimes coaches do well at schools with high academics and terrible at state universities. Have you ever heard of Tyrone Willingham?grizindabox said:Maybe this is just me....but with the limitations due to academics that Stitt had at CSM......wouldn't that mean he has more experience....you know...since he had to dig deeper into the population pool to find football players....
Although vague, that's a fair response.Triwest said:Actually he did recruit solid players at Mines and had to reject some very good players who wanted to play for him but did not meet the requirements for the school. As far as coaches go he hired coaches that were very good teachers of the game. (For those on here who know who I am they know I have been in the coaching field a very long time.)
Nice try. Didn't actually say that, though, did I?grizindabox said:..then no coach that moves from D2 to FCS or similar should be able to recruit....or at a minimum...be unable to recognize the type of recruit necessary at a higher level.....
UMGriz75 said:Too, this is all new. Stitt has never recruited before where he is able to actually recruit genuine football athletes from a large population pool. He's a first timer at all this. This is the least experienced coach, from the standpoint of recruiting, that UM has ever had.
Bringing up fellow Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference coaches who are equally inexperienced doesn't solve the problem when he's losing his experienced FCS-level coaches with long FCS-level experience -- and success -- at recruiting. And that goes for coaches as well as athletes.