Simis to WR

[Bear Axed]

If anyone in the world is capable to turning Simis into a viable receiver...

Our $300,000.00 Coach is.....

How else could he get the full 300?
If he isn't capable?

 

[UMGriz75]

If anyone in the world is capable to turning Simis into a viable receiver...

Our $300,000.00 Coach is.....

How else could he get the full 300?
If he isn't capable?

He already earned over that last year ...

 

[Bear Axed]

If anyone in the world is capable to turning Simis into a viable receiver...

Our $300,000.00 Coach is.....

How else could he get the full 300?
If he isn't capable?

He already earned over that last year ...

If you say so......?
Then I agree with you!
There is no question he's that type of genius, that only a coach of his high caliber
would be able to turn a player that's only ever played one position into being viable at another...

(edit): I almost forgot to edit

2nd (edit): trust me on the stats....I've provided them numerous times to all you idiots

 

[UMGriz75]

If anyone in the world is capable to turning Simis into a viable receiver...

Our $300,000.00 Coach is.....

How else could he get the full 300?
If he isn't capable?

He already earned over that last year ...

If you say so......?
Then I agree with you!
There is no question he's that type of genius, that only a coach of his high caliber
would be able to turn a player that's only ever played one position into being viable at another...

(edit): I almost forgot to edit

2nd (edit): trust me on the stats....I've provided them numerous times to all you idiots

Well, there it is then ...

 

[UMGriz75]

If anyone in the world is capable to turning Simis into a viable receiver...

Our $300,000.00 Coach is.....

How else could he get the full 300?
If he isn't capable?

He already earned over that last year ...

If you say so......?
Then I agree with you!

Your "tune" seems to have changed.

75 you still need to prove the 300 thousand mark......
you didn't say "can earn" the 1st few posts you claimed as fact he earned at least 300 thousand.
Once questioned on it a few times...? Yes it's true, you did try to back track a bit....with out admitting your agenda driven claim wasn't an out right lie, an attempt to stear the conversation your direction, by claiming something false as fact.....
everyone knows you are a liar and you are unwilling to admit it.....and you aren't very good at math either :roll:
:bs: :jack:
:liar: :liar: :liar:

 

[grizindabox]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

 

[UMGriz75]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

 

[grizindabox]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

 

[UMGriz75]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

 

[grizindabox]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

For being such a "smart" guy.....why do you keep taking the bait....it has nothing to do with Simis.....by the way....do you think he will have more rushing yards than Gus next season......he is a much better runner you know....

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

I am still trying to figure out why Stitt is moving the best QB to another position..... :roll:

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

Total bullshit 75. The best part is you are so arrogant that you can't even admit you were incorrect even after numerous people called you out and Stitt moved him to WR. Deep down you still think he is a better QB than Gus based on your "statistical" analysis. Just admit it. There is no way a bad QB can throw 6 TD's in a game.

 

[UMGriz75]

How long are you going to "keep trying?" And why?

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

Total bullshit 75. The best part is you are so arrogant that you can't even admit you were incorrect even after numerous people called you out and Stitt moved him to WR. Deep down you still think he is a better QB than Gus based on your "statistical" analysis. Just admit it. There is no way a bad QB can throw 6 TD's in a game.

You want to keep this going forever. The BS is that "facts" in the form of statistical review refuted your delusional analyses, and the NDSU game confirmed it, and you were humiliated. Like a jilted "ex" you just can't let go. No wonder you identified with the "vicitm" in the JJ trial.

Just admit it and move on with your sorry life.

 

[grizindabox]

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

Total bullshit 75. The best part is you are so arrogant that you can't even admit you were incorrect even after numerous people called you out and Stitt moved him to WR. Deep down you still think he is a better QB than Gus based on your "statistical" analysis. Just admit it. There is no way a bad QB can throw 6 TD's in a game.

You want to keep this going forever. The BS is that "facts" in the form of statistical review refuted your delusional analyses, and the NDSU game confirmed it, and you were humiliated. Like a jilted "ex" you just can't let go. No wonder you identified with the "vicitm" in the JJ trial.

Just admit it and move on with your sorry life.

75....so where exactly do you stand.....do you think Simis was or wasn't the best OB on the roster....and all the NDSU game demonstrated was that Gus was a terrible QB that day....it did nothing to prove that Simis was/is the better QB.....so I don't see where anything was refuted.....

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

I was not the one implying that Simis was the best QB on the roster........wonder whom that was.......

Still harping on an "implication" rather than my direct words? How long are you going to keep trying to "imply" I said something when I did not, in fact, say it or imply it?

I did refute your specific claims, and that still bothers you, doesn't it?

Total bullshit 75. The best part is you are so arrogant that you can't even admit you were incorrect even after numerous people called you out and Stitt moved him to WR. Deep down you still think he is a better QB than Gus based on your "statistical" analysis. Just admit it. There is no way a bad QB can throw 6 TD's in a game.

You want to keep this going forever. The BS is that "facts" in the form of statistical review refuted your delusional analyses, and the NDSU game confirmed it, and you were humiliated. Like a jilted "ex" you just can't let go. No wonder you identified with the "vicitm" in the JJ trial.

Just admit it and move on with your sorry life.

I think that you have me mixed up with someone else.

 

[grizindabox]

I am done here.....proved my point....too bad 75 is too obtuse to figure it out....

 

[UMGriz75]

I am done here.....proved my point....too bad 75 is too obtuse to figure it out....

No, the original point was, you made some claims about the relative abilities of the QBs. I pointed out that your claims had no statistical support. I specifically said, "they may be true, they just have no statistical support," and walked through the statistical data. And that's a quote.

Good heavens, don't challenge those two ego titans. It quickly evolved into "oh yeah, so you think Simis is the better quarterback?" which is not what I said. It was the classic red herring logical fallacy, indeed, attempted to change the question by specifically claiming I "implied" the opposite of what I specifically said; or as HH just tried to do, assert that "deep down" I believe something other than what I actually said.

The fact is, at that point in time, there was no statistical support for your claims, and NDSU game pretty much confirmed exactly the points I made that did not support your claim.

Your frantic efforts ever since to put words in my mouth that I never said, does not change the actual fact that you were the ones who made claims you could not support with objective facts. The only point you proved is your rank dishonesty when you make claims you cannot subsequently defend with objective data.

 

[UMGriz75]

75....so where exactly do you stand.....do you think Simis was or wasn't the best OB on the roster....and all the NDSU game demonstrated was that Gus was a terrible QB that day....it did nothing to prove that Simis was/is the better QB.....so I don't see where anything was refuted.....

See, there you go, trying to change the original question. You made claims. I said you could not support your claims objectively, and referred to the statistical data. Of course, you looked like an idiot because you couldn't point to any data that supported your claims, so you tried to change the question. Yet, I specifically said, regarding QBs, "you could be right," just that you didn't seem to be able to identify any metrics that supported your claim. Hint: in "English," the semi-official language of egriz, "you could be right," does not mean that I said something entirely different that I did not, in fact, ever say. Indeed, I specifically stated, repeatedly now, that I could not make the claim you have attempted by innuendo to suggest I made.

Both of your efforts were simply smoke-screens for having been caught at making improbable assertions, and then spending the next five months trying to lie your way out of them.

 

[grizindabox]

75....I think the title of this thread says it all....your "statistical" analysis was incorrect...my "subjective" analysis was correct....difficult to believe the stats let you down.....

 

[UMGriz75]

75....I think the title of this thread says it all....your "statistical" analysis was incorrect...my "subjective" analysis was correct....difficult to believe the stats let you down.....

At no time did I say you were wrong. However, since you insist on being a dolt and putting words into my mouth that I did not say, I did predict that your faith in your subjective analysis failed the objective test of the statistical record, and made specific points as to why. Each of those specific points was subsequently validated by the NDSU game which is when you and your little friend once again went nuts trying to pretend I had said something I hadn't said, which is why, having once again resurrected the debate you lost, you now try to claim that I "implied" or "believe deep down," both of which are admissions I did not actually say what I you claim I said because in fact I never said it.

I did say your analysis was faulty.

It was.

That's when you started lying about what I said, trying to obscure the fact that NDSU confirmed every point I made and refuted every "subjective" claim you made as directly and publicly as a point can be made. It could not have been clearer. You know that, and that your claims, as refuted by my statistical analysis, were proven wrong in the place it counts the most, on the field.

Your damaged ego is all that this ridiculous "discussion" is all about, and your pathetic efforts to lie your way out of your ridiculous claims and predictions because they were so publicly and arrogantly made, and so publicly and finally disproved.

At that time, mid-season, I did say "you could be right," a phrase you seem incapable of understanding. The final game of the season proved you were not.

 

[grizindabox]

So the NDSU game verified that Simis was a better option at QB than Gus for you......what it demonstrated for me was that even though Gus was the best option....the position needed to be upgraded.....funny how you keep telling me that is incorrect...


I have never lied once....you on the other hand.....the term wishy-washy comes to mind.....