• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Simis to WR

Status
Not open for further replies.
grizindabox said:
So the NDSU game verified that Simis was a better option at QB than Gus for you........
I have never lied once....you on the other hand.....the term wishy-washy comes to mind.....
Click to expand...
Sorry that reasoning is such a tall hurdle for you. My analysis demonstrated that you had no basis for your claims. The NDSU game proved it.

You keep lying trying to pretend I said something else, even as you then are forced to concede I only "implied" something else. No, get this straight. It was your analysis that was examined. As demonstrated, you had no objective or rational basis for it. Q.E.D.. Get past your "little boy" argument that always starts out with "so, what you meant to say is ....." No. Get it through your little head. Your desperate evasions on the stupidity of your analysis does not survive my actual comments ("you may be right") and emphatically did not survive the NDSU game.

Let's be clear: "You may be right" refers to a claim "You" made. The fact is, you weren't.

Get it?
 
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
So the NDSU game verified that Simis was a better option at QB than Gus for you........
I have never lied once....you on the other hand.....the term wishy-washy comes to mind.....
Click to expand...
Sorry that reasoning is such a tall hurdle for you. My analysis demonstrated that you had no basis for your claims. The NDSU game proved it.

You keep lying trying to pretend I said something else, even as you then are forced to concede I only "implied" something else. No, get this straight. It was your analysis that was examined. As demonstrated, you had no objective or rational basis for it. Q.E.D.. Get past your "little boy" argument that always starts out with "so, what you meant to say is ....." No. Get it through your little head. Your desperate evasions on the stupidity of your analysis does not survive my actual comments ("you may be right") and emphatically did not survive the NDSU game.

Let's be clear: "You may be right" refers to a claim "You" made. The fact is, you weren't.

Get it?
Click to expand...

No basis for what claims.....What did the NDSU game prove.....and just because you lack any real football knowledge and can not break down tape doesn't mean that my basis is incorrect....have you ever broken down game footage.....didn't think so.....yet you want to bash a cornerstone of analysis used by every single football coach in America.....and I still have no idea how Gus's performance against NDSU validates your implication that Simis was a better QB based on your analysis......because it doesn't....
 
grizindabox said:
No basis for what claims.....What did the NDSU game prove.....and just because you lack any real football knowledge and can not break down tape doesn't mean that my basis is incorrect....have you ever broken down game footage.....didn't think so.....yet you want to bash a cornerstone of analysis used by every single football coach in America.....and I still have no idea how Gus's performance against NDSU validates your implication that Simis was a better QB based on your analysis......because it doesn't....
Click to expand...
God, what an inferiority complex you have. It must be painful.

The fact is, you made a claim that could not be supported. Then you tried to twist my comment that, based on other factors, "you might be right," into falsely claiming that I said Simis was a better QB, which is more or less the opposite of "you might be right." The fact is, when you got embarrassed and started claiming, to counter the statistical argument, you offered nothing at all except "it's complex and you've never broken down a tape."

And when I demanded, then, several times that you justify your claims and specific analysis according to your generalized claims of knowledge this was always your answer:
In other words, you had no "game play" analysis to offer either. It was just another failed bluff.

The fact was demonstrated, you not only could not support your claims through statistics, you had no such "game play" expertise either. You never could answer the direct question, instead lying to try and claim I said something I did not in fact say.

Your devious convolutions notwithstanding, you made claims that you could not support either with statistics or your "claimed knowledge" of the game, which was demonstrated to also be nothing more than an unsupported gasbag claim. At each point, when set to the task of defending your claims, you were unable to do so by any methodology, and you were publicly called out on it and collapsed in a heap of ad hominem remarks desperately trying to change the subject. Just as when you made the idiotic remark for all to see that Stitt "did not blame the player....he said that he played terrible..." which everyone got a kick out of because it was so blatantly ridiculous, as is this conversation.

You were obviously humiliated or the episode would not be so painful that you continually return to it making at each return a bigger fool of yourself all the while.
 
UMGriz75 said:
grizindabox said:
No basis for what claims.....What did the NDSU game prove.....and just because you lack any real football knowledge and can not break down tape doesn't mean that my basis is incorrect....have you ever broken down game footage.....didn't think so.....yet you want to bash a cornerstone of analysis used by every single football coach in America.....and I still have no idea how Gus's performance against NDSU validates your implication that Simis was a better QB based on your analysis......because it doesn't....
Click to expand...
God, what an inferiority complex you have. It must be painful.

The fact is, you made a claim that could not be supported. Then you tried to twist my comment that, based on other factors, "you might be right," into falsely claiming that I said Simis was a better QB, which is more or less the opposite of "you might be right." The fact is, when you got embarrassed and started claiming, to counter the statistical argument, you offered nothing at all except "it's complex and you've never broken down a tape."

And when I demanded, then, several times that you justify your claims and specific analysis according to your generalized claims of knowledge this was always your answer:
In other words, you had no "game play" analysis to offer either. It was just another failed bluff.

The fact was demonstrated, you not only could not support your claims through statistics, you had no such "game play" expertise either. You never could answer the direct question, instead lying to try and claim I said something I did not in fact say.

Your devious convolutions notwithstanding, you made claims that you could not support either with statistics or your "claimed knowledge" of the game, which was demonstrated to also be nothing more than an unsupported gasbag claim. At each point, when set to the task of defending your claims, you were unable to do so by any methodology, and you were publicly called out on it and collapsed in a heap of ad hominem remarks desperately trying to change the subject. Just as when you made the idiotic remark for all to see that Stitt "did not blame the player....he said that he played terrible..." which everyone got a kick out of because it was so blatantly ridiculous, as is this conversation.

You were obviously humiliated or the episode would not be so painful that you continually return to it making at each return a bigger fool of yourself all the while.
Click to expand...


Actually.....I just like poking the bear.....because it is funny seeing you post a billion words on stuff it is so obvious that you don't understand that you attempt to make others look inept and clueless just to make yourself feel better.....it is all good....I feel sympathetic for people like you.......but I will let you in on something....breaking down tape isn't black magic or voodoo....and it is OK if you admit that you don't know enough to do it.....but let me leave you with these:

“There are three types of lies -- lies, damn lies, and statistics.”
― Benjamin Disraeli

“Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are pliable.”
― Mark Twain

“If your experiment needs a statistician, you need a better experiment.”
― Ernest Rutherford

Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein

Statistics are like women; mirrors of purest virtue and truth, or like whores to use as one pleases. ~Theodor Billroth
 
That still represents your famous "game play" analysis when challenged to use that analysis to defend the claims that you tried to make. The fact is, you had nothing; just hot air, and continue to try and argue a point you could never make by continuing to lie about what I actually said, and continuing to pursue it months after you demonstrated for all to see that you did not know what you were talking about.
 
UMGriz75 said:
That still represents your famous "game play" analysis when challenged to use that analysis to defend the claims that you tried to make. The fact is, you had nothing; just hot air, and continue to try and argue a point you could never make by continuing to lie about what I actually said, and continuing to pursue it months after you demonstrated for all to see that you did not know what you were talking about.
Click to expand...

I actually did supply details....you just conveniently skipped over it....or didn't understand it.....just like everything else that does not fit your narrative...

but I am sure you have better things to do.....your moon chart to pinpoint when you are at peak ovulation....or your spreadsheet and relating graph of how long you must diet so you might fit into that size 6 you just splurged on....
 
grizindabox said:
I actually did supply details....you just conveniently skipped over it....or didn't understand it.....just like everything else that does not fit your narrative...
Click to expand...
No, you actually didn't. That's also a lie. I asked the question repeatedly and all you could dredge up were vague comments about play analysis is complicated, as though forgiving yourself for not being able a single reason to support your claims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top