poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
I am totally fired up the EWU game. A big challenge and perfect time/game for the Griz to redeem themselves. The NAU was an unfortunate and disappointing loss, but, with the Griz making a half dozen more or better plays on both sides of the ball, UM would have won. It just isn't true that the Griz were horrible or they sucked, or that BG was horrible or sucked. Sure, they didn't play well, but a lot of the problem was the lack of making enough big plays, and making too many key mistakes, along with some smaller goof ups.
EWU will be a tough opponent, but I think the Griz O should be able to move the ball and score, and the D should be able to make enough stops. We will see how the team responds. I just can't see them not responding well. The Griz O and D must have had good game plans last year. I assume they will this year too. While I don't know, I assume we'll see McGee. Hope so. I give the Griz a good chance of getting the job done.
P.S. I truly don't understand why Griz fans wouldn't be excited about this game. This is part of what sport is about. Rebounding from adversity and failure. Rising to a big challenge. I think our guys have the heart and ability to do this.
And if the bear wouldn't have stopped to sh** he would have caught the rabbit. Some games come down to one or maybe two key plays that sway the outcome...... but to say half a dozen? From my chair it looked like you guys pretty much got dominated. My buddy (Griz fan) and I were watching from a bar stool and when NAU was up 45 to 20... you could just see Jerome go conservative and take his foot off the gas because the outcome was decided. Had thay wanted to just stick with the game plan at that point it likely would have been 52 to 20 or even more lopsided. Regarding EWU, I'm not saying it's impossible - but you guys just don't win there and I think they're significantly more talented than you.
I think you missed the point. I didn't say the Griz should or could have won, or didn't get clobbered. I said they missed making, or played poorly, on a half dozen or so plays on both sides of the ball. I think the Griz have more talent and are better than NAU, even though NAU took it to the Griz and deserved the win. But, with the Griz being a good team and needing only to clean up that few plays and mistakes, that type of clean up and recovery is doable, in my view.
I don't agree that NAU could have beaten UM worse.
Certainly don't agree that UM got "dominated". Got clobbered but not dominated. Look at the stats:
First downs (UM to NAU) - 24 to 20
Total offense - 542 - 406
Average gain per play - 6.3 to 5.6
Turnovers - 2 to 1
3d down conversions - 5 of 16 - 2 of 15
Red zone scoring - 5-5 - 5-6 (NAU got more TD's) - UM should have gotten more TD's, and this is one of the things I'm talking about (when Calhoun gets tripped up running for TD, UM ended up with only 3, I believe)
Points off TO's 6 - 14 (Griz need to not turnover on short part of field)
I see no domination in these stats, yet NAU owned the scoreboard.
TOP - 31 to 29