• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

PoorGriz believes UM 3 down d-lineman are small

bigkid said:
Sims won’t have any problems in the trenches. :coffee:

He is down a bit at 270 lbs (he isn’t 280 as was asked/posted in another thread) but agree his strength is still an upside for him. I’d still rather see him bumped out to DE and a bigger DT put in that role. Sims is also getting less credit than he deserves eating up blocks and allowing our backers to make plays and get all the headlines.
 
I was actually surprised to see him at nose and Gubner at end. Coaches must see it that way so I guess time will tell...
 
CDAGRIZ said:
PG also believes the new Bozeman QB will go for 25-30 TDs, fewer than 10 INTs, 65% comp percentage, and over 200 ypg.

True story. I informed him that those numbers make the new QB easily one of the top 2-3 QBs in the league as only 3 QBs last year had production like that. Poorgriz really making himself look clueless about the game of football.
 
cowboywayne said:
Don’t really care what PG posted or the avg weight of the Cats DLine.

For a 3-3-5 defense, I personally think our 3 man front is too small.

With this scheme I would prefer to see the DT at 300/320 with DEs at 270/280.


Edit:

Yes, I know San Diego State’s down linemen average about 260

WHOA there pardner, you just get your ass outta here with that crazy talk. Even suggesting the griz D Line might be a bit undersized will get PR coming down on you like a ton of bricks... you done it now. :shock: :lol:
 
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
Because they average 2 pounds less than the Cats.

Does 2 pounds really make that much difference?

Discuss.

Uh, not quite what I was saying, I was more looking at four D lineman for when you line up that way. I was honestly just asking if you guys thought your D line across the board was a bit light this year.

No, we don't. Even including the 6'6", 215 stand up guy as the 4th, UM's d-line is only 26 pounds in total less than the Cats, which is 4.5 pounds per player.

Why don't you just admit that you didn't do your homework and asked a stupid question?
 
bigkid said:
Sims won’t have any problems in the trenches. :coffee:

This. Everyone in the stands or watching on TV or course keeps an eye on the ball. Single out Sims while watching a replay sometime. He's usually keeping a couple guys occupied on any given play.
 
cowboywayne said:
bigkid said:
Sims won’t have any problems in the trenches. :coffee:

He is down a bit at 270 lbs (he isn’t 280 as was asked/posted in another thread) but agree his strength is still an upside for him. I’d still rather see him bumped out to DE and a bigger DT put in that role. Sims is also getting less credit than he deserves eating up blocks and allowing our backers to make plays and get all the headlines.

Sims weighed in to start camp at 280. So he lost 10 lbs you're saying?
 
How the fuck does poorgriz get his own thread over here? Damn little brothers. And on the little brother concept, how does the scouting report turn into a TTU defense thread? #winning.

Why can't there be a thread called "ABQ thinks Bauman has better aggregate YPA, QBR and more wins in the 2 common opponents plus Brawl vs Sneed"? Or Payton's contribution that resulted after he seemingly wished an injury on a Bobcat player: "ABQ thinks Sneed will miss a full series due to injury before Bauman"?
 
Diesel said:
cowboywayne said:
Don’t really care what PG posted or the avg weight of the Cats DLine.

For a 3-3-5 defense, I personally think our 3 man front is too small.

With this scheme I would prefer to see the DT at 300/320 with DEs at 270/280.


Edit:

Yes, I know San Diego State’s down linemen average about 260

Nice correction, WV used this type of D years ago so their undersized players could compete. Speed and different angles. Changing hybrid of man and zone with multiple blitz packages, keeping offense guessing on who is rushing and who is covering.
Common sense thought...three DL, they need to be big like 3-4, not the case with 3-3-5 undersize with speed. Last year DL didn’t have enough speed, they had size, improvement in edge rush speed will be positive change this year.

This is false. Bigger and slower is more important than smaller and faster in the 3-3-5.

The the entire purpose of the defense is to clog the middle and funnel the plays to the spurs and rover(or whatever terminology the coaches here use for LB and safety position Hauck plays
 
PAGriz said:
Diesel said:
cowboywayne said:
Don’t really care what PG posted or the avg weight of the Cats DLine.

For a 3-3-5 defense, I personally think our 3 man front is too small.

With this scheme I would prefer to see the DT at 300/320 with DEs at 270/280.


Edit:

Yes, I know San Diego State’s down linemen average about 260

Nice correction, WV used this type of D years ago so their undersized players could compete. Speed and different angles. Changing hybrid of man and zone with multiple blitz packages, keeping offense guessing on who is rushing and who is covering.
Common sense thought...three DL, they need to be big like 3-4, not the case with 3-3-5 undersize with speed. Last year DL didn’t have enough speed, they had size, improvement in edge rush speed will be positive change this year.

This is false. Bigger and slower is more important than smaller and faster in the 3-3-5.

The the entire purpose of the defense is to clog the middle and funnel the plays to the spurs and rover(or whatever terminology the coaches here use for LB and safety position Hauck plays
Oversimplification.
 
kemajic said:
PAGriz said:
Diesel said:
cowboywayne said:
Don’t really care what PG posted or the avg weight of the Cats DLine.

For a 3-3-5 defense, I personally think our 3 man front is too small.

With this scheme I would prefer to see the DT at 300/320 with DEs at 270/280.


Edit:

Yes, I know San Diego State’s down linemen average about 260

Nice correction, WV used this type of D years ago so their undersized players could compete. Speed and different angles. Changing hybrid of man and zone with multiple blitz packages, keeping offense guessing on who is rushing and who is covering.
Common sense thought...three DL, they need to be big like 3-4, not the case with 3-3-5 undersize with speed. Last year DL didn’t have enough speed, they had size, improvement in edge rush speed will be positive change this year.

This is false. Bigger and slower is more important than smaller and faster in the 3-3-5.

The the entire purpose of the defense is to clog the middle and funnel the plays to the spurs and rover(or whatever terminology the coaches here use for LB and safety position Hauck plays
Oversimplification.

Agreed Kem
A couple specifics for 3-3-5. First, suited for smaller faster defensive personnel, shares 4-2-5 facets with one less DL causing confusion to O-line on where additional rushers are coming from.
Second, Nose has one gap responsibility unlike 3-4 Nose who has two gap responsibilities. 3-4 better be large, speed not important. 3-3-5 Nose needs great first step, watch Jesse Sims against CP whose Oline are fast off snap and get leverage against DL, Jesse holds up great.
The strong side DE gets double team from Tackle and TE, has guaranteed double team and weak side DE has to hold up to double team when TE motions to his side.
Boils down to speed trumping size. Doesn’t hurt that the 270 lb Nose is strong as an ox.
 
ABQCat said:
How the f*** does poorgriz get his own thread over here? Damn little brothers. And on the little brother concept, how does the scouting report turn into a TTU defense thread? #winning.

Why can't there be a thread called "ABQ thinks Bauman has better aggregate YPA, QBR and more wins in the 2 common opponents plus Brawl vs Sneed"? Or Payton's contribution that resulted after he seemingly wished an injury on a Bobcat player: "ABQ thinks Sneed will miss a full series due to injury before Bauman"?

I’ve been a fly on the wall for some time on e-griz and wonder the same thing haha. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t enjoy watching it... but I agree that it’s a bit odd. FTC... now I feel better :)
 
ABQCat said:
How the f*** does poorgriz get his own thread over here? Damn little brothers. And on the little brother concept, how does the scouting report turn into a TTU defense thread? #winning.

Why can't there be a thread called "ABQ thinks Bauman has better aggregate YPA, QBR and more wins in the 2 common opponents plus Brawl vs Sneed"? Or Payton's contribution that resulted after he seemingly wished an injury on a Bobcat player: "ABQ thinks Sneed will miss a full series due to injury before Bauman"?

You want your own thread on egriz making fun of you? That can probably be arranged.
 
ABQCat said:
How the f*** does poorgriz get his own thread over here? Damn little brothers. And on the little brother concept, how does the scouting report turn into a TTU defense thread? #winning.

Why can't there be a thread called "ABQ thinks Bauman has better aggregate YPA, QBR and more wins in the 2 common opponents plus Brawl vs Sneed"? Or Payton's contribution that resulted after he seemingly wished an injury on a Bobcat player: "ABQ thinks Sneed will miss a full series due to injury before Bauman"?

Consolation prize for not having a life…………..
 
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
Because they average 2 pounds less than the Cats.

Does 2 pounds really make that much difference?

Discuss.

Uh, not quite what I was saying, I was more looking at four D lineman for when you line up that way. I was honestly just asking if you guys thought your D line across the board was a bit light this year.

No, we don't. Even including the 6'6", 215 stand up guy as the 4th, UM's d-line is only 26 pounds in total less than the Cats, which is 4.5 pounds per player.

Why don't you just admit that you didn't do your homework and asked a stupid question?

This is the same Cat who honestly predicted their new freshman QB would put up all conference numbers with 25+ TDs, 200 passing ypg, less than 10 picks, and over a 60% completion rate. This should tell you everything you need to know about Poorgriz’ absolute lack of football knowledge. He honestly had no idea those numbers would be incredible. He’s such a dip shit.
 
cclarkblues said:
PlayerRep said:
Because they average 2 pounds less than the Cats.

Does 2 pounds really make that much difference?

Discuss.

It makes a difference when you consider PoorGriz's brain weight 2 pounds less than average..

That's hardcore. The weight of the average human brain is 3 pounds!
 
ABQCat said:
How the f*** does poorgriz get his own thread over here? Damn little brothers. And on the little brother concept, how does the scouting report turn into a TTU defense thread? #winning.

Why can't there be a thread called "ABQ thinks Bauman has better aggregate YPA, QBR and more wins in the 2 common opponents plus Brawl vs Sneed"? Or Payton's contribution that resulted after he seemingly wished an injury on a Bobcat player: "ABQ thinks Sneed will miss a full series due to injury before Bauman"?

Perhaps it's because you occasionally post in complete sentences. pg on the other hand posts in grunts.
 
HookedonGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
Because they average 2 pounds less than the Cats.

Does 2 pounds really make that much difference?

Discuss.

Uh, not quite what I was saying, I was more looking at four D lineman for when you line up that way. I was honestly just asking if you guys thought your D line across the board was a bit light this year.

No, we don't. Even including the 6'6", 215 stand up guy as the 4th, UM's d-line is only 26 pounds in total less than the Cats, which is 4.5 pounds per player.

Why don't you just admit that you didn't do your homework and asked a stupid question?

This is the same Cat who honestly predicted their new freshman QB would put up all conference numbers with 25+ TDs, 200 passing ypg, less than 10 picks, and over a 60% completion rate. This should tell you everything you need to know about Poorgriz’ absolute lack of football knowledge. He honestly had no idea those numbers would be incredible. He’s such a dip shit.

Yes, and I did say up front it was a wild ass guess and my only real PREDICTION that I bet $$ on was that our passing stats would be better than what they've been. OK hot shot football gurus, if you're so all knowing when it comes to these things why don't you predict where we'll be in those three categories, and while you're at it please tell me where Dalton Sneed will end up?
 
Bauman 3 TD, 155 ypg, 9 (he won't play enough to get more but will have the highest INT to PA ratio in the BSC), 51%

Sneed 29 TD, 285 ypg, 6, 63%
 
poorgriz said:
HookedonGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Uh, not quite what I was saying, I was more looking at four D lineman for when you line up that way. I was honestly just asking if you guys thought your D line across the board was a bit light this year.

No, we don't. Even including the 6'6", 215 stand up guy as the 4th, UM's d-line is only 26 pounds in total less than the Cats, which is 4.5 pounds per player.

Why don't you just admit that you didn't do your homework and asked a stupid question?

This is the same Cat who honestly predicted their new freshman QB would put up all conference numbers with 25+ TDs, 200 passing ypg, less than 10 picks, and over a 60% completion rate. This should tell you everything you need to know about Poorgriz’ absolute lack of football knowledge. He honestly had no idea those numbers would be incredible. He’s such a dip shit.

Yes, and I did say up front it was a wild ass guess and my only real PREDICTION that I bet $$ on was that our passing stats would be better than what they've been. OK hot shot football gurus, if you're so all knowing when it comes to these things why don't you predict where we'll be in those three categories, and while you're at it please tell me where Dalton Sneed will end up?

But even for a wild ass guess that was as bad as it could get. I mean it truly shows me you don’t have a lot of knowledge about the game of football or the stat leaders in the conference. Which also tells me a lot of what you spew over here is just absolute shit.

As far as passing numbers go, there literally is nowhere to go but up so your willingness to put dollars on that should be pretty automatic. I mean the cats literally can do no worse than what they’ve done passing the last couple years

As for Sneed I think he will put up numbers similar to last year which places him in the top three or so quarterbacks in the league. I think he’ll throw a few more touchdowns. For Baumann, I think he will be doing pretty damn well if he throws 150 yards per game, completed 55% of his passes and throws 13 touchdowns. I think he probably throws at least 10 picks if he’s not replaced w Rovig by game 5
 
Back
Top