Griz2k said:
GrizPony said:
Why would I give you a f*cking break when you aren't willing to give one to anyone else?

Also, enlighten me as to what I tried and failed at "though". :thumb:
I knew I'd get the "you must be perfect" argument. Sad to see someone bite so quickly. I know one thing though, I am not a Griz football player that bought drugs at a rave after a game. To me, Griz football is like the 100 meter dash..... first false start is charged to the entire field. Next false start by anyone and that person is dq'd. The Griz have had plenty of "false starts" and frankly I'm tired of seeing our players in the news for run in's with the law. He should be given a second chance...just not for the Griz.
And some of us are tired of "fans" like you being so holier than thou, unrealistic and unforgiving. If, after an accused has done what he's supposed to do under the agreement reached with the prosecution, the charges completely go away and essentially deemed never to have occurred, why wouldn't he be given another chance. Even the new tougher athletic code doesn't provide for permanent dismissal in a situation like this.
Stupid, yes. Unfortunate, yes. But possession of 2 pills is really not the crime of the century. No other person was harmed in the incident. How about the Cat bouncer who punched a patron, and must have hurt him enough to be charged with felony assault? Do you think possessing 2 pills is so much worse than doing whatever it takes to get charged with felony assault, that the kid should never be allowed to play again at his original school? By the way, I have no problem with the Cat player getting out of his charges and being allowed to play. You probably think that a person acquitted of his charge, like Wilson, should never be given a second chance either.