PlayerRep said:WILD_CAT said:PlayerRep said:mtgrizrule said:How can anyone even debate Poole of being innocent? He knowing purchased and possessed drugs. I wish him the best. With everything going on with the GRIZ, I honestly feel this is the time for the GRIZ to make a strong statement, and not tolerate this kind of decision making.
At some point in time, the GRIZ have to make a strong statement and a tone that bad decisions will not be tolerated. At some point the example has to be made of one of these players. The sooner the better, to move forward with cleaning up the program's reputation.
My opinion has nothing to do with Trevor. I think highly of him and his family. It has to do with the decision makers show this crap is a thing of the past, and not tolerated here any longer.
Has anyone even tried to argue that he's innocent? If not, why do you even make such a silly statement.
Under the US legal system, the next question is whether he could be convicted, based on legally seized evidence or legally received statements. I hope you are not suggesting that the US Constitution and Bill of Rights should not apply? And the next question is what is the proper resolution or penalty for having 2 pills of ecstasy in one's possession. My guess is that the last question will be the most important question. Feel free to call our attention to all of the first time offenders in Montana who had no prior criminal problems and who cooperated with legal authorities, who received felony sentences. I'd like to see some examples.
Some of you seem to think that zero tolerance of any problems will cause college kids not to make mistakes or do dumb things. I don't agree.
It was 2 pills. Maybe he was going to use them; maybe he bought then for a friend. The federal sentencing guidelines, which don't apply here, are notoriously too hard on this "crime". From what I've read, the guidelines punish more for dosages of ecstasy than for heroin and cocaine, even though many in the medical field say ecstasy is much less dangerous to the person than those other drugs and doesn't lead to other significant crimes.
I don't apologize for believing in the US Constitution and Bill of Right nor for US and state Constitutionally guaranteed criminal rights. It is truly amazing to me that some of you don't believe in the US Constitution. The level of ignorance is astounding.
Unfortunately the Player Code of Conduct TRUMPS the US Constitution. When they sign their scholarship they agree to abide by the Player Conduct code. How hard is that to comprehend? I think 3 other players got suspended by just being there? No?
Actually, state universities are subject to the US Constitution, and a state university player code certainly does NOT trump the US Constitution.
In addition, the UM student-athlete code says that if a player is charged with a felony (and where it is reasonable to believe the player committed the act), the athletic conduct team of the university "shall take preliminary action to temporarily suspend the student-athlete from participation in practice, competition and/or access to athletic department services...." This is a Category I Violation. Note the "preliminarily", as well as the "and/or", especially the "or".
The code goes on to say: "This suspension is indefinite pending the outcome of disciplinary and/or criminal proceedings."
A Category II Violation is a "non-felony criminal offense and some other non-applicable offense. The penalty for a Category II Violation, First Offense, is a "minimum of one contest suspension". Second offense is minimum of 30% of scheduled contests. Third offense is "dismissal from team".
So, just looking at the athletic code, it looks like Poole's incident would drop at least to a Category II Violation, for which dismissal would be the penalty only if it were the third offense, which this surely isn't.
I hope some of you are not suggesting that UM violate it's new (tougher and more specific) code.
I am suggesting that Poole committed a felony and therefore should never suit up for the Griz again.