HelenaHandBasket said:George Ferguson said:CFallsGriz said:I don't get why people are taking HHB to task on this. The premise that the UM defense was helped, (to what degree is unknowable), by the loss of their #1 potential All-American QB, is reasonable.
It's not as if he's saying the D sucked all game, just that the outcome could well have been very different, so less was proven than would have otherwise been. That's reasonable. He said it was a gutsy win.
Enjoy it. Sheesh
I'm not saying Helena is wrong. Anyone with any sense at all knows NAU's offense would have produced today with Cookus in the game. But by Helena's rationale, then Griz fans should get the same rationale when discussing Montana's offense in EVERY single game AFTER the UDUB game. The Griz have played the ENTIRE Big Sky schedule to date with 1. A backup RS-Freshman QB who NEVER planned on starting a game this season, 2. the end of the Weber game with the No. 3 QB who hadn't gotten a 1st-team rep since August, AND 3. an H Receiver who hadn't thrown a meaningful pass in more than 700 days.
Or better yet, I'll just let one of the team leaders explain it for you.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/KeenanCurran6/status/926982074904461312[/tweet]
My only rationale was stating that the Griz defense, today, benefited from Cookus getting tossed. People don't have to agree with it, but trying to give credibility to it by using hypotheticals about the Griz offense don't disprove it. The Griz defense played a solid game against the team NAU put on the field. But I still don't get all Gooey thinking about the Griz defense based on this game. Sorry it gets so many peoples panties in a huge wad.
If all you had said in this thread is that the Griz benefited from Cookus getting tossed, I doubt that many, if any, would be jumping at you. You said and insinuated more.