• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Ok, No More JJ. What now?

Keep the self-flagellating about how nothing will change with McKinney or hyphenated at QB. But you know that you really do not believe it, you just want to appear positive for board points. That's the main thing with many of you.
 
Growler1 said:
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.

No, I am saying that you will still probably get a drop-down or JC transfer, but that the one you do get doesn't have any other options (meaning he probably wont be that good) because of the situation.

So any transfer you get probably wont be as good as the kids you already have on the roster.
 
Cats2506 said:
Growler1 said:
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.

No, I am saying that you will still probably get a drop-down or JC transfer, but that the one you do get doesn't have any other options (meaning he probably wont be that good) because of the situation.

So any transfer you get probably wont be as good as the kids you already have on the roster.

Keep wishin', and hopin', and prayin', and dreamin'.
 
Growler1 said:
Cats2506 said:
Growler1 said:
Cats2506 said:
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.

No, I am saying that you will still probably get a drop-down or JC transfer, but that the one you do get doesn't have any other options (meaning he probably wont be that good) because of the situation.

So any transfer you get probably wont be as good as the kids you already have on the roster.

Keep wishin', and hopin', and prayin', and dreamin'.

Still in denial huh? :thumb:
 
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


1. Because you as a transfer QB want to win a National Championship.

2. The NCAA is not and will not be "snooping" around.

3. Same as under Pflu.

4. Griz do not "need" Kemp at WR.

5. Griz crush kittys by 40. Win BSC. Very deep playoff run.

6. 2506 talks out his ass.

7. In other words, same as the last 30 years.
 
bigtyme said:
Rosenberg's offense is going to be a new dimension and we will see less HC influence than we did with Smith/Pflugrad in my opinion.


I thought our new offensive coordinator was Timm Rosenbach < http://www.gogriz.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/041312aae.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
EverettGriz said:
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


1. Because you as a transfer QB want to win a National Championship.

2. The NCAA is not and will not be "snooping" around.

3. Same as under Pflu.

4. Griz do not "need" Kemp at WR.

5. Griz crush kittys by 40. Win BSC. Very deep playoff run.

6. 2506 talks out his ass.

7. In other words, same as the last 30 years.

Whats that you say :lol: :lol:
 
Still our QB & still enrolled for Fall
http://newstalkkgvo.com/jordan-johnson-still-enrolled-and-on-the-football-team-audio/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Growler1 said:
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.

Like Cats2506 said ... All the turmoil could make it difficult for a JC or transfer to sign. What system will UM be running? Will the current coach stay? Will UM have NCAA penalties applied? All those should be big issues for players coming in the next year I would think. They would be for me if I was going to sign with them (I bet it would be for the parents of those players too).
 
Cats2506 said:
EverettGriz said:
Cats2506 said:
Umista said:
My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......

If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?

You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.


1. Because you as a transfer QB want to win a National Championship.

2. The NCAA is not and will not be "snooping" around.

3. Same as under Pflu.

4. Griz do not "need" Kemp at WR.

5. Griz crush kittys by 40. Win BSC. Very deep playoff run.

6. 2506 talks out his ass.

7. In other words, same as the last 30 years.

Whats that you say :lol: :lol:

evershitgriz: where talking out your ass and indigestion collide. not unexpectedly there's a few other swings and misses on his list.
 
Back
Top