Growler1 said:Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.
Cats2506 said:Growler1 said:Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.
No, I am saying that you will still probably get a drop-down or JC transfer, but that the one you do get doesn't have any other options (meaning he probably wont be that good) because of the situation.
So any transfer you get probably wont be as good as the kids you already have on the roster.
Growler1 said:Cats2506 said:Growler1 said:Cats2506 said:If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.
No, I am saying that you will still probably get a drop-down or JC transfer, but that the one you do get doesn't have any other options (meaning he probably wont be that good) because of the situation.
So any transfer you get probably wont be as good as the kids you already have on the roster.
Keep wishin', and hopin', and prayin', and dreamin'.
Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
bigtyme said:Rosenberg's offense is going to be a new dimension and we will see less HC influence than we did with Smith/Pflugrad in my opinion.
EverettGriz said:Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
1. Because you as a transfer QB want to win a National Championship.
2. The NCAA is not and will not be "snooping" around.
3. Same as under Pflu.
4. Griz do not "need" Kemp at WR.
5. Griz crush kittys by 40. Win BSC. Very deep playoff run.
6. 2506 talks out his ass.
7. In other words, same as the last 30 years.
Growler1 said:Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
You are praying we will not get drop-down. But we will. your logic for why a kid would not want to start for the Montana Grizzlies is ridiculous.
Cats2506 said:EverettGriz said:Cats2506 said:Umista said:My vote would be for a drop down/transfer ......
If your a JC transfer or a FBS dropdown why would you want to spend you remaining 2 years of eligibility at a place that has an interim HC, new OC and DC, under federal investigation, probably has the NCAA snooping around. What is the offensive "system" at this point?
You need Kemp at WR, better be putting you hopes in the idea that McKinney or SSH step up and play the part.
1. Because you as a transfer QB want to win a National Championship.
2. The NCAA is not and will not be "snooping" around.
3. Same as under Pflu.
4. Griz do not "need" Kemp at WR.
5. Griz crush kittys by 40. Win BSC. Very deep playoff run.
6. 2506 talks out his ass.
7. In other words, same as the last 30 years.
Whats that you say :lol: :lol: