CDAGRIZ said:IdaGriz01 said:Well, yes, in a way ... but with justification. As I recall, news reports about the latest contract between the NCAA and ESPN stated that FCS playoff games would be "broadcast." That was/is the deal.
For most people, "broadcast" means they can get it on a TV without jumping through a lot of hoops, although it might be on an unusual channel somewhere. Technically, I suppose, sending it out on the web is a kind of "broadcast." But in normal usage, "streaming" is not a form of broadcast. I'm sure the lawyers made sure that ESPN could weasel out of actually broadcasting the games by "making them available" ... so we're stuck. But people who don't want to watch on their computers (or phones) have reason to be pissed.
Just trying to help. Honestly, if someone really wants to watch the game, but only if he can turn the dial to Channel 4, and there are multiple (very simple) other ways to watch the game, and he refuses to do any of them, I justifiably wonder just how much he wants to watch the game.
I really want to order a pizza for the game, but my very favorite place is closed. Multiple other places that are good, but nah. So, I have to eat iceberg lettuce instead. How much would you say I want to order a pizza versus complain about a place being closed? IDK, guys.
I want fried chicken and in 'Merica there is no reason why I should have to settle for pizza. None.