• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

No one knows where people are getting infected

kemajic said:
Jesse said:
Spank, are you really ok with how Trump is carrying out his duties? What does slimy joe and Doctor Biden have to to with the here and now in running our country?
It's very relevant; it relates to how much worse it will become after 1/20/2021. Trump has accomplishments Slimy Joe and Dr. Biden could only dream about, including Warp Speed development and delivery of 3 vaccines in 8 months. In your TDS, you just don't like those accomplishments; they throw shade on everything you spout.

looks like you have trump demagogue syndrome, because only someone in the trump cult would think that any president's administration would not have done just as much as trump's. indeed, you sound like trump, practically proclaiming he made the vaccines himself. he didn't create any vaccine, it was done mostly by private companies, one working with oxford university (astra zeneca), johnson and johnson's (old school vaccine, one shot), and moderna, working with the nih, who's budget trump worked hard to cut. sinovac and sputnik 5 from china and russia, respectively, have also been developed and used, although they have not been openly and rigorously studied in the manner required by the fda. as for distribution, trump turned down the opportunity to buy 100 million more doses from pfizer, so they sold them to other countries, slowing the u.s. vaccine program.

trump basically left the states to fend for themselves, so we haven't had any sort of coordinated response, and haven't done stuff like freeze travel to and from hot-spot areas. trump also downplayed the virus, created the mask 'controversy', and had large, mostly maskless gatherings of the type where the virus is spread inspiring, millions of idiots to not wear them. i'd give him a d+ or a c- on his administration's handling of the issue. the key word in the last sentence is "administration" - it isn't a one person job to handle this stuff, and a president is a figurehead, not the guy doing the actual work. this particular figurehead is apparently going to hold a large, undoubtedly mostly maskless rally on january 6th, to get his supporters frothing at the mouth about dems deviously stealing the election, which trump lost by 7 million votes. probably lots of virus spread at that 'rally'.

to conclude, you make a straw-man argument by saying trump did a great job dealing with the virus, as compared to your fantasy of how biden's administration would handle it. as usual, you present your fantasy analysis as fact.
 
argh! said:
kemajic said:
It's very relevant; it relates to how much worse it will become after 1/20/2021. Trump has accomplishments Slimy Joe and Dr. Biden could only dream about, including Warp Speed development and delivery of 3 vaccines in 8 months. In your TDS, you just don't like those accomplishments; they throw shade on everything you spout.

looks like you have trump demagogue syndrome, because only someone in the trump cult would think that any president's administration would not have done just as much as trump's. indeed, you sound like trump, practically proclaiming he made the vaccines himself. he didn't create any vaccine, it was done mostly by private companies, one working with oxford university (astra zeneca), johnson and johnson's (old school vaccine, one shot), and moderna, working with the nih, who's budget trump worked hard to cut. sinovac and sputnik 5 from china and russia, respectively, have also been developed and used, although they have not been openly and rigorously studied in the manner required by the fda. as for distribution, trump turned down the opportunity to buy 100 million more doses from pfizer, so they sold them to other countries, slowing the u.s. vaccine program.

trump basically left the states to fend for themselves, so we haven't had any sort of coordinated response, and haven't done stuff like freeze travel to and from hot-spot areas. trump also downplayed the virus, created the mask 'controversy', and had large, mostly maskless gatherings of the type where the virus is spread inspiring millions of idiots to not wear them. i'd give him a d+ or a c- on his administration's handling of the issue. the key word in the last sentence is "administration" - it isn't a one person job to handle this stuff, and a president is a figurehead, not the guy doing the actual work. this particular figurehead is apparently going to hold a large, undoubtedly mostly maskless rally on january 6th, to get his supporters frothing at the mouth about the election, claiming the dems stole the election, which trump lost by 7 million votes. probably lots of virus spread there.

to conclude, you make a straw-man argument by saying trump did a great job dealing with the virus, as compared to your fantasy of how biden's administration would handle it. as usual, you present your fantasy analysis as fact.
Arg the resident covid expert, retort that Kem or rather just stfu instead lol
 
argh! said:
kemajic said:
It's very relevant; it relates to how much worse it will become after 1/20/2021. Trump has accomplishments Slimy Joe and Dr. Biden could only dream about, including Warp Speed development and delivery of 3 vaccines in 8 months. In your TDS, you just don't like those accomplishments; they throw shade on everything you spout.

looks like you have trump demagogue syndrome, because only someone in the trump cult would think that any president's administration would not have done just as much as trump's. indeed, you sound like trump, practically proclaiming he made the vaccines himself. he didn't create any vaccine, it was done mostly by private companies, one working with oxford university (astra zeneca), johnson and johnson's (old school vaccine, one shot), and moderna, working with the nih, who's budget trump worked hard to cut. sinovac and sputnik 5 from china and russia, respectively, have also been developed and used, although they have not been openly and rigorously studied in the manner required by the fda. as for distribution, trump turned down the opportunity to buy 100 million more doses from pfizer, so they sold them to other countries, slowing the u.s. vaccine program.

trump basically left the states to fend for themselves, so we haven't had any sort of coordinated response, and haven't done stuff like freeze travel to and from hot-spot areas. trump also downplayed the virus, created the mask 'controversy', and had large, mostly maskless gatherings of the type where the virus is spread inspiring millions of idiots to not wear them. i'd give him a d+ or a c- on his administration's handling of the issue. the key word in the last sentence is "administration" - it isn't a one person job to handle this stuff, and a president is a figurehead, not the guy doing the actual work. this particular figurehead is apparently going to hold a large, undoubtedly mostly maskless rally on january 6th, to get his supporters frothing at the mouth about the election, claiming the dems stole the election, which trump lost by 7 million votes. probably lots of virus spread there.

to conclude, you make a straw-man argument by saying trump did a great job dealing with the virus, as compared to your fantasy of how biden's administration would handle it. as usual, you present your fantasy analysis as fact.

What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view. Edit: The US economy didn't go down as much as some other countries, and has come back to some extent. Same with unemployment. Stock market dropped alot but has come back and even gone up to set records. The stimulus and vaccines are helping.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Edit: Trump has been silent on the virus, as opposed to the vaccines, since the election. Suppose he could have exercised more leadership. Don't know who would have listened to him. Maybe his own people. Don't know how many Trump base people are getting covid and dying. I think he should continued to address the virus.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.
 
PlayerRep said:
argh! said:
looks like you have trump demagogue syndrome, because only someone in the trump cult would think that any president's administration would not have done just as much as trump's. indeed, you sound like trump, practically proclaiming he made the vaccines himself. he didn't create any vaccine, it was done mostly by private companies, one working with oxford university (astra zeneca), johnson and johnson's (old school vaccine, one shot), and moderna, working with the nih, who's budget trump worked hard to cut. sinovac and sputnik 5 from china and russia, respectively, have also been developed and used, although they have not been openly and rigorously studied in the manner required by the fda. as for distribution, trump turned down the opportunity to buy 100 million more doses from pfizer, so they sold them to other countries, slowing the u.s. vaccine program.

trump basically left the states to fend for themselves, so we haven't had any sort of coordinated response, and haven't done stuff like freeze travel to and from hot-spot areas. trump also downplayed the virus, created the mask 'controversy', and had large, mostly maskless gatherings of the type where the virus is spread inspiring millions of idiots to not wear them. i'd give him a d+ or a c- on his administration's handling of the issue. the key word in the last sentence is "administration" - it isn't a one person job to handle this stuff, and a president is a figurehead, not the guy doing the actual work. this particular figurehead is apparently going to hold a large, undoubtedly mostly maskless rally on january 6th, to get his supporters frothing at the mouth about the election, claiming the dems stole the election, which trump lost by 7 million votes. probably lots of virus spread there.

to conclude, you make a straw-man argument by saying trump did a great job dealing with the virus, as compared to your fantasy of how biden's administration would handle it. as usual, you present your fantasy analysis as fact.

What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.

good debate points, some weak, some strong. i'll get back to you tomorrow, different news has put a damper on the day, so to speak. oh, and where are your citations? this'll give you time to edit, and put them in :)
 
argh! said:
PlayerRep said:
What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.

good debate points, some weak, some strong. i'll get back to you tomorrow, different news has put a damper on the day, so to speak. oh, and where are your citations? this'll give you time to edit, and put them in :)

Most everything I wrote has been posted by me previously and has multiple cites. See those postings. That's why I could do this most of this off the top of my head. It was old news to me.
 
PlayerRep said:
Jesse said:
Read the administration initially reported that they might have to invoke the defense production act to help out Pfizer because it was running low on raw materials to manufacture its vaccine, implying that Pfizer f###[#] up by not having enough in the supply pipeline. Then Pfizer said no way we are fine, any shortage is because the administration chose not to lock into a deal for millions of more doses back in June. So Pfizer then turned to the rest of the world and took orders from them that we turned down. Now there is a forecast for a shortage of the Pfizer vaccine for the US. Could the rest of the world really have made a better deal then Trump back in June?

Ps. Pfizer also reported that they have surplus stocks in warehouses but Pfizer has said that there is no plan by the administration on how to immediately distribute the surplus. We are setting daily death records, one 9/11 everyday now. Its like he doesn’t care anymore. What the [#]f### dude show some heart and play to the final gun.

[From the WaPost.]

1. "One official said the initial numbers of available doses that were provided to states were projections based on information from the manufacturers, not fixed allocations. Some state officials may have misunderstood that, the official said.

2. "The two officials also said that changes the federal government made to the delivery schedule, at the request of governors, may be contributing to a mistaken impression that fewer doses are coming. The key change involves spacing out delivery of states’ weekly allocations over several days to make distribution more manageable.

“They will get their weekly allocation, it just won’t come to them on one day,” one official said."

3. "The senior administration officials said Pfizer’s statement about doses awaiting shipping instructions, while technically accurate, conveniently omits the explanation: It was planned that way.

The federal officials said Pfizer committed to provide 6.4 million doses of its vaccine in the first week after approval. But the federal Operation Warp Speed had already planned to distribute only 2.9 million of those doses right away. Another 2.9 million were to be held at Pfizer’s warehouse to guarantee that individuals vaccinated the first week would be able to get their second shot later to make protection fully effective. Finally, the government is holding an additional 500,000 doses as a reserve against unforeseen problems.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/some-states-say-pfizer-vaccine-allotments-cut-for-next-week/2020/12/17/71e180e8-40c5-11eb-b58b-1623f6267960_story.html

From NY Times today:'

"Gen. Gustave F. Perna, who heads Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s multiagency effort to get coronavirus vaccines out to Americans, apologized repeatedly on Saturday morning for confusion over vaccine deliveries to states.

He attributed some of the problems to the federal government’s miscalculation of how many doses of Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine could be shipped. The discrepancies disrupted vaccination plans and stirred consternation in at least 14 states.

General Perna is in charge of the logistics for distributing the coronavirus vaccines to the states, and he took full and sole responsibility for the delays and confusion around the vaccine rollout, and for the discrepancies between the number of doses states were expecting and what they are receiving.

“It was my fault,” he said. “It was a planning error, and I am responsible.”

“I want to take personal responsibility for the miscommunication,” General Perna said at a news conference. He said the number of vaccines available to allocate ended up being lower than initial forecasts.

“I had to lower the allocations to meet the releasable doses that were presented to me,” General Perna said. “So to the governors,” he said, “please accept my personal apology if this was disruptive in your decision-making.”

He added that he did not understand with “exactness” the requirements for the release of each batch of doses. He referred several times to the Food and Drug Administration’s involvement, but was unclear about how that would have delayed shipments."
 
PlayerRep said:
argh! said:
looks like you have trump demagogue syndrome, because only someone in the trump cult would think that any president's administration would not have done just as much as trump's. indeed, you sound like trump, practically proclaiming he made the vaccines himself. he didn't create any vaccine, it was done mostly by private companies, one working with oxford university (astra zeneca), johnson and johnson's (old school vaccine, one shot), and moderna, working with the nih, who's budget trump worked hard to cut. sinovac and sputnik 5 from china and russia, respectively, have also been developed and used, although they have not been openly and rigorously studied in the manner required by the fda. as for distribution, trump turned down the opportunity to buy 100 million more doses from pfizer, so they sold them to other countries, slowing the u.s. vaccine program.

trump basically left the states to fend for themselves, so we haven't had any sort of coordinated response, and haven't done stuff like freeze travel to and from hot-spot areas. trump also downplayed the virus, created the mask 'controversy', and had large, mostly maskless gatherings of the type where the virus is spread inspiring millions of idiots to not wear them. i'd give him a d+ or a c- on his administration's handling of the issue. the key word in the last sentence is "administration" - it isn't a one person job to handle this stuff, and a president is a figurehead, not the guy doing the actual work. this particular figurehead is apparently going to hold a large, undoubtedly mostly maskless rally on january 6th, to get his supporters frothing at the mouth about the election, claiming the dems stole the election, which trump lost by 7 million votes. probably lots of virus spread there.

to conclude, you make a straw-man argument by saying trump did a great job dealing with the virus, as compared to your fantasy of how biden's administration would handle it. as usual, you present your fantasy analysis as fact.

What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view. Edit: The US economy didn't go down as much as some other countries, and has come back to some extent. Same with unemployment. Stock market dropped alot but has come back and even gone up to set records. The stimulus and vaccines are helping.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Edit: Trump has been silent on the virus, as opposed to the vaccines, since the election. Suppose he could have exercised more leadership. Don't know who would have listened to him. Maybe his own people. Don't know how many Trump base people are getting covid and dying. I think he should continued to address the virus.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.

ok, while i don't think what you wrote is a strong refutation of what i posted, or that you necessarily meant it to be, here goes, keeping in mind that, by far, the best way to slow a pandemic is at the start. also, presidents get credit for stuff they shouldn't, and blame for stuff they shouldn't:

1) trump closed travel from china january 31st, 9 days after china itself stopped internal travel from wuhan. too late, in my book

2) trump stopped travel from europe march 11 - that is way, way too late, given the obviously quick spread of the vaccine.

3) trump might have listened to fauci and birks several times, but shouldn't he always have been listening to experts?

4) regarding mask messaging, trump of course has been abysmal, but i'm not sure why so many are giving fauci a pass. as a scientist, i'm appalled by the man. he knowingly lied to the american public about masks, thinking he was going to save masks for the hospitals. if he would have told the truth, perhaps a lot of the idiocy regarding masks wouldn't have happened. i recoil every time i hear him praised, even lionized sometimes. my opinion is that he has caused a lot of unnecessary deaths.

5) trump probably didn't order nursing homes to take covid patients, but he should have stopped it by having a real national strategy, which he never did. i don't know that any governor is an infectious disease expert, and having 50 of them making different decisions created confusion that still exists today. in this instance, the u.s. needed strong leadership at the top. this doesn't excuse governors for making stupid decisions, though.

6) i think any administration would have done something similar to the 'warp speed' tactic. i think it is really weak to try to give trump points, or the dems a negative evaluation on this when comparing them, because that just involves making stuff up. also, pharmaceutical companies smelled big, big money, and several had a jump on things as they'd already worked on vaccines for coronaviruses (SARS). some in the administration did do a good job cutting through the bullshit regulations, but i don't think trump gets credit for that, even though many will give it to him.

7) trump publicly called for less testing. nobody listened to him. don't think he called for contact tracing, but the u.s. is very big, and given the relatively rapid spread of the virus, don't know that it would work well here. also, there is a constitutional issue here that doesn't exist with the mask stuff.

8) the stimulus helped, but the hodge-podge way businesses has been regulated is a disaster. trump and the feds couldn't control it all, for sure, but here their job is messaging as much as anything. trump 'messaged' alright, but in the opposite way than was needed.

9) can't write any more now, but gave it a start. don't think you are totally wrong in your analysis, don't think you are totally right, either. also, sorry for all the typos.
 
Spanky2 said:
He took full responsibility and didn’t pass the buck.

You probably missed his statement on NOT accepting responsibility.

'I don't take responsibility at all': Trump deflects blame for coronavirus testing fumble Politico
 
argh! said:
PlayerRep said:
What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view. Edit: The US economy didn't go down as much as some other countries, and has come back to some extent. Same with unemployment. Stock market dropped alot but has come back and even gone up to set records. The stimulus and vaccines are helping.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Edit: Trump has been silent on the virus, as opposed to the vaccines, since the election. Suppose he could have exercised more leadership. Don't know who would have listened to him. Maybe his own people. Don't know how many Trump base people are getting covid and dying. I think he should continued to address the virus.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.

ok, while i don't think what you wrote is a strong refutation of what i posted, or that you necessarily meant it to be, here goes, keeping in mind that, by far, the best way to slow a pandemic is at the start. also, presidents get credit for stuff they shouldn't, and blame for stuff they shouldn't:

1) trump closed travel from china january 31st, 9 days after china itself stopped internal travel from wuhan. too late, in my book [Would have been tough to move any faster. Lots of resistance when he moved. No identified cases in US then. WHO didn't declare global health emergency until Jan. 31. First death reported outside of China on Feb. 2. China cut off Wuhan on Jan. 23. China and WHO were finally not denying that there could be human to human spread.]

2) trump stopped travel from europe march 11 - that is way, way too late, given the obviously quick spread of the vaccine. [Yes, it would have been nice to know that much spread on East Coast was coming from Europe and closed Europe sooner. But the US didn't know this until later. The US took some flak for closing European travel when it did. Perhaps not having the 3-week or so testing snafu would have helped on this. Italy experienced a surge in Feb 23. Italy instituted lockdown on March 24.]

3) trump might have listened to fauci and birks several times, but shouldn't he always have been listening to experts? [I think Trump listened to therm on all major decisions in the spring. Not sure what major things he may not have acted on. Agree in general on getting advice from them, but elected leaders should make decision after getting advice, not scientists, many of whom don't know the big picture, including economics.]

[First multi-billion dollar US stimulus/covid billed signed on March 27.]

4) regarding mask messaging, trump of course has been abysmal, but i'm not sure why so many are giving fauci a pass. as a scientist, i'm appalled by the man. he knowingly lied to the american public about masks, thinking he was going to save masks for the hospitals. if he would have told the truth, perhaps a lot of the idiocy regarding masks wouldn't have happened. [Agreed. Probably a mistake. Don't know who made the decision, whether Fauci or others or both.] i recoil every time i hear him praised, even lionized sometimes. my opinion is that he has caused a lot of unnecessary deaths.

5) trump probably didn't order nursing homes to take covid patients, but he should have stopped it by having a real national strategy, which he never did. [Don't think it would have been possible for Trump to stop what Cuomo, etc. did.] i don't know that any governor is an infectious disease expert, and having 50 of them making different decisions created confusion that still exists today. [I see what you mean, but significant states rights is the US system under the Consitution and otherwise,. The feds were talking to the governors every week or almost every week, I read.] in this instance, the u.s. needed strong leadership at the top. this doesn't excuse governors for making stupid decisions, though. [Agree on both counts.]

6) i think any administration would have done something similar to the 'warp speed' tactic. i think it is really weak to try to give trump points, or the dems a negative evaluation on this when comparing them, because that just involves making stuff up. also, pharmaceutical companies smelled big, big money, and several had a jump on things as they'd already worked on vaccines for coronaviruses (SARS). some in the administration did do a good job cutting through the bullshit regulations, but i don't think trump gets credit for that, even though many will give it to him. [From what I've read, Trump and his people deserve significant credit for pushing hard for this and moving it along faster. Romney just said this on Jake Tapper. I think Trump moved it along faster than Dems would have. But yes, Dems would have also done something similar.]

7) trump publicly called for less testing. nobody listened to him. don't think he called for contact tracing [I took it more as an offhand and stupid comment, which the media overplayed.], but the u.s. is very big, and given the relatively rapid spread of the virus, don't know that it would work well here. also, there is a constitutional issue here that doesn't exist with the mask stuff. [Agree on Constititutonal and system issues. The US feds have lifted power. Americans generally are very independent and aren't going to do certain things. Again, I never studied tracking.]

8) the stimulus helped, but the hodge-podge way businesses has been regulated is a disaster. trump and the feds couldn't control it all, for sure, but here their job is messaging as much as anything. trump 'messaged' alright, but in the opposite way than was needed. [How did Trump message wrong on the stimulus?]

9) can't write any more now, but gave it a start. don't think you are totally wrong in your analysis, don't think you are totally right, either. also, sorry for all the typos.

Thx. Nice to have some specifics. As you said, our disagreement is largely on the fringes. See my above embedded comments. A good NY Times timeline:

https://www.nytimes.com/article/coronavirus-timeline.html?auth=login-email&login=email
 
fanofzoo said:
Spanky2 said:
He took full responsibility and didn’t pass the buck.

You probably missed his statement on NOT accepting responsibility.

'I don't take responsibility at all': Trump deflects blame for coronavirus testing fumble Politico
General Perna, not Trump
 
PlayerRep said:
MT virus stats as of 12/12:

More men (56%) than women have died.

Deaths: 1 person age 29. 10- 30-39; 25- 40-49; 65- 50-59; 116- 60-69; 223- 70-79; 241 -80-89; 135 - over 90.

Deaths of Native Americans now down to 25%, from as high as 39%. About 7% of population.

Of those situations known, 8% have pre-existing conditions. Hypertension, diabetes.

MT's cases per capita rank 10th among states. 72,000 per million. More than any country in the world, other than Andora. Ahead of all northeastern states except RI. NY is 44,000 and 36th. CA is 46,000. MT is lower in deaths per capita.

https://dphhs.mt.gov/Portals/85/publichealth/documents/CDEpi/DiseasesAtoZ/2019-nCoV/COVID%20EPI%20PROFILE%2012112020.pdf

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

What I find most interesting about Montana's infection rate is that our hospitals were not over run, even at the peak. The number hospitalized is now going down pretty significantly from its peak. North Dakota and South Dakota also had significantly higher infections than Montana (No 1 &2 in the nation) and their hospitals were not over ran either.
 
ranco said:
PlayerRep said:
MT virus stats as of 12/12:

More men (56%) than women have died.

Deaths: 1 person age 29. 10- 30-39; 25- 40-49; 65- 50-59; 116- 60-69; 223- 70-79; 241 -80-89; 135 - over 90.

Deaths of Native Americans now down to 25%, from as high as 39%. About 7% of population.

Of those situations known, 8% have pre-existing conditions. Hypertension, diabetes.

MT's cases per capita rank 10th among states. 72,000 per million. More than any country in the world, other than Andora. Ahead of all northeastern states except RI. NY is 44,000 and 36th. CA is 46,000. MT is lower in deaths per capita.

https://dphhs.mt.gov/Portals/85/publichealth/documents/CDEpi/DiseasesAtoZ/2019-nCoV/COVID%20EPI%20PROFILE%2012112020.pdf

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

What I find most interesting about Montana's infection rate is that our hospitals were not over run, even at the peak. The number hospitalized is now going down pretty significantly from its peak. North Dakota and South Dakota also had significantly higher infections than Montana (No 1 &2 in the nation) and their hospitals were not over ran either.

I thought that was interesting too. People not getting as sick now? More early treatments? More beds per capita? Less non-covid people in beds?


This is interesting too:

"A record 621 people died of drug overdoses in San Francisco so far this year, a staggering number that far outpaces the 173 deaths from COVID-19 the city has seen thus far.

The crisis fueled by the powerful painkiller fentanyl could have been far worse if it wasn’t for the nearly 3,000 times Narcan was used from January to the beginning of November to save someone from the brink of death, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Saturday."

https://www.google.com/search?q=more+overdose+deaths+in+sf+than+covid&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS865US865&oq=more+overdose+deaths+in+sf+than+covid&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160l2.11200j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
Jesse said:
Spanky2 said:
Jesse: without Trump, there wouldn’t be a vaccine to worry about.
Actually, the Pfizer vaccine was made in Germany developed by two Turkish immigrants, so yeah let’s name the vaccine after Trump because without him there wouldn’t have been a vaccine. Lol

The wife was born in Germany. "Dr. Türeci, now 53 and the chief medical officer of BioNTech, was born in Germany, the daughter of a Turkish physician who immigrated from Istanbul.:

"Even before the pandemic, BioNTech was gaining momentum. The company raised hundreds of millions of dollars and now has more than 1,800 people on staff, with offices in Berlin, other German cities and Cambridge, Mass. In 2018, it began its partnership with Pfizer."

"The two billionaires live with their teenage daughter in a modest apartment near their office. They ride bicycles to work. They do not own a car.

“Ugur is a very, very unique individual,” Mr. Bourla, Pfizer’s chief executive, said in the interview last month. “He cares only about science. Discussing business is not his cup of tea. He doesn’t like it at all. He’s a scientist and a man of principles. I trust him 100 percent.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/business/biontech-covid-vaccine.html?searchResultPosition=2
 
ranco said:
PlayerRep said:
MT virus stats as of 12/12:

More men (56%) than women have died.

Deaths: 1 person age 29. 10- 30-39; 25- 40-49; 65- 50-59; 116- 60-69; 223- 70-79; 241 -80-89; 135 - over 90.

Deaths of Native Americans now down to 25%, from as high as 39%. About 7% of population.

Of those situations known, 8% have pre-existing conditions. Hypertension, diabetes.

MT's cases per capita rank 10th among states. 72,000 per million. More than any country in the world, other than Andora. Ahead of all northeastern states except RI. NY is 44,000 and 36th. CA is 46,000. MT is lower in deaths per capita.

https://dphhs.mt.gov/Portals/85/publichealth/documents/CDEpi/DiseasesAtoZ/2019-nCoV/COVID%20EPI%20PROFILE%2012112020.pdf

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

What I find most interesting about Montana's infection rate is that our hospitals were not over run, even at the peak. The number hospitalized is now going down pretty significantly from its peak. North Dakota and South Dakota also had significantly higher infections than Montana (No 1 &2 in the nation) and their hospitals were not over ran either.

I don't know about "overran" in regards to available beds, but I know that Sanford Hospital in Fargo has been flying nurses in to help for well over a month now. Last week they had 150 nurses that arrived from other parts of the country because the staff had no chance in keeping up with new admissions. And they're paying those nurses 8-10k a week!

Doesn't change your overall point but that was one hospital I know has needed a lot of help.
 
ilovethecats said:
ranco said:
What I find most interesting about Montana's infection rate is that our hospitals were not over run, even at the peak. The number hospitalized is now going down pretty significantly from its peak. North Dakota and South Dakota also had significantly higher infections than Montana (No 1 &2 in the nation) and their hospitals were not over ran either.

I don't know about "overran" in regards to available beds, but I know that Sanford Hospital in Fargo has been flying nurses in to help for well over a month now. Last week they had 150 nurses that arrived from other parts of the country because the staff had no chance in keeping up with new admissions. And they're paying those nurses 8-10k a week!

Doesn't change your overall point but that was one hospital I know has needed a lot of help.

Learn something everyday. I never knew that Fargo was in Montana.
 
argh! said:
PlayerRep said:
What, specifically, would have saved lives had Trump taken other action?'

Trump closed most travel from China fairly early, and was criticized by Biden and Dems for that. That was a big deal.

Trump declared a national emergency fairly early.

The CDC goofed up testing in Feb. and cost a few weeks. On Trump's watch, but not sure you can blame Trump.

Trump cut off European travel fairly early. Don't recall any Dem or Biden calling for that earlier. There was more covid in Europe and from Europe than the US or anyone knew.

Trump actually listened to Fauci and Birx several times, an d called for shut downs fairly early and before people like Cuomo and de Blassio called for and took similar action. And I think before WHO declared a pandemic.

The WHO, CDC, Fauci and others were not calling for masks earlier on. I know you were. One of the problems was that most of the world hadn't recognized the thread from a- and pre-symptomatic people before and droplets.

In the US, we have a federal-state system. Repubs are generally states rights. Trump couldn't have ordered shutdowns. That's a state right, not federal. When Trump said he was going to do that, the press and Dems complained, and he backed off.

While Trump generally encouraged opening of the economy, many states opened without complying with the CDC guidelines.

There was a lot of complaining in the press about lack of PPE, ventilators and beds, I think the feds responded fairly well, and I don't think there was ever much shortage that caused a bunch of deaths. Feel free to site some articles to the contrary. We ended up with way too many beds and ventilators in NYC and elsewhere in the March/April/May/June and summer timeframe.

Yes, Trump's and some others' messaging were weak/bad/wrong. But, were Dems, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, people in elder care homes, etc. really listening to Trump and doing what he suggested? I can't imagine many were. Yes, bad messaging on mask-wearing, but there were-are scientists also questioning the benefits of masks. Also, first, there was don't need them, then they are good for stopping droplets from a spreader, then maybe they work for the recipients too. Talk about bad messaging.

Don't think Trump ordered elder care homes to accept covid-positive patients like multiple governors did.

Three is no doubt that Warp Speed was a huge help for helping drug companies speed up drug company vaccine research, trials and get early approval, along with awesome action by the drug companies and developers. And many vaccines were pre-ordered. Perhaps Dems would have done the same thing with Warp Speed. I doubt it.

The feds and Mnuchin did a very good job early on. The delay for the second round is too bad, but Pelosi and Dems were a large part of that problem. 50% or more of the problem, in my view. Edit: The US economy didn't go down as much as some other countries, and has come back to some extent. Same with unemployment. Stock market dropped alot but has come back and even gone up to set records. The stimulus and vaccines are helping.

I didn't follow the tracing thing. Seems like that's something more for states and counties, not feds, but I suppose it would be some sort of cooperation.

Every state has had huge problems at some time or another, or a few times. I just don't see how recent ;problems in NY and CA and other states can be blamed on Trump.

Almost 40% of deaths were in elder care homes and almost 40% of the deaths were People of Color. Very unfortunate, but were they listening to Trump and what did Trum;p do or not do to let them die (compared to what Biden would have done)? Obviously, the two 40% numbers have some overlap.

Edit: Trump has been silent on the virus, as opposed to the vaccines, since the election. Suppose he could have exercised more leadership. Don't know who would have listened to him. Maybe his own people. Don't know how many Trump base people are getting covid and dying. I think he should continued to address the virus.

Happy to see your views, and see some citations.

ok, while i don't think what you wrote is a strong refutation of what i posted, or that you necessarily meant it to be, here goes, keeping in mind that, by far, the best way to slow a pandemic is at the start. also, presidents get credit for stuff they shouldn't, and blame for stuff they shouldn't:

1) trump closed travel from china january 31st, 9 days after china itself stopped internal travel from wuhan. too late, in my book

2) trump stopped travel from europe march 11 - that is way, way too late, given the obviously quick spread of the vaccine.

3) trump might have listened to fauci and birks several times, but shouldn't he always have been listening to experts?

4) regarding mask messaging, trump of course has been abysmal, but i'm not sure why so many are giving fauci a pass. as a scientist, i'm appalled by the man. he knowingly lied to the american public about masks, thinking he was going to save masks for the hospitals. if he would have told the truth, perhaps a lot of the idiocy regarding masks wouldn't have happened. i recoil every time i hear him praised, even lionized sometimes. my opinion is that he has caused a lot of unnecessary deaths.

5) trump probably didn't order nursing homes to take covid patients, but he should have stopped it by having a real national strategy, which he never did. i don't know that any governor is an infectious disease expert, and having 50 of them making different decisions created confusion that still exists today. in this instance, the u.s. needed strong leadership at the top. this doesn't excuse governors for making stupid decisions, though.

6) i think any administration would have done something similar to the 'warp speed' tactic. i think it is really weak to try to give trump points, or the dems a negative evaluation on this when comparing them, because that just involves making stuff up. also, pharmaceutical companies smelled big, big money, and several had a jump on things as they'd already worked on vaccines for coronaviruses (SARS). some in the administration did do a good job cutting through the bullshit regulations, but i don't think trump gets credit for that, even though many will give it to him.

7) trump publicly called for less testing. nobody listened to him. don't think he called for contact tracing, but the u.s. is very big, and given the relatively rapid spread of the virus, don't know that it would work well here. also, there is a constitutional issue here that doesn't exist with the mask stuff.

8) the stimulus helped, but the hodge-podge way businesses has been regulated is a disaster. trump and the feds couldn't control it all, for sure, but here their job is messaging as much as anything. trump 'messaged' alright, but in the opposite way than was needed.

9) can't write any more now, but gave it a start. don't think you are totally wrong in your analysis, don't think you are totally right, either. also, sorry for all the typos.

Trump had to make decisions without the benefit of hindsight or prior experience in the medical fields with this particular virus, a luxury you have with conjuring criticism. And your criticisms don;t really deal with two factors in play for Trump, political considerations (state's rights AND responsibilities) and economic concerns. In other words, your criticisms come from a rather myopic point of review. Trump was juggling 3 balls, but you suggest he should have only paid attention to one.

What we do see in hindsight is both those who got sick and those who didn't in democrat run states seem to have faired far worse than those in republican run states, both in health and in economic pain. At least that's the way the national media paints the picture. Anecdotally, other than temporary loss of smell and taste this virus affected me no different than the illnesses that followed both of my flu shots in past years, and I wish now I had gotten covid in February instead of November.
 
PlayerRep said:
ilovethecats said:
I don't know about "overran" in regards to available beds, but I know that Sanford Hospital in Fargo has been flying nurses in to help for well over a month now. Last week they had 150 nurses that arrived from other parts of the country because the staff had no chance in keeping up with new admissions. And they're paying those nurses 8-10k a week!

Doesn't change your overall point but that was one hospital I know has needed a lot of help.

Learn something everyday. I never knew that Fargo was in Montana.
I don't think it is. I think it's still in North Dakota. So when Ranco mentioned North Dakota I felt that a hospital in North Dakota was relevant to the conversation. This isn't to say there's NOT a town named Fargo in Montana too. But I was speaking about the Fargo that is North Dakota. After a poster mentioned North Dakota.....

I can highlight that portion of Rancos post in which he mentioned North Dakota if that helps you in any way? It's just above my post but I'm happy to do it if it helps your comprehension in your older age....
 
ilovethecats said:
PlayerRep said:
Learn something everyday. I never knew that Fargo was in Montana.
I don't think it is. I think it's still in North Dakota. So when Ranco mentioned North Dakota I felt that a hospital in North Dakota was relevant to the conversation. This isn't to say there's NOT a town named Fargo in Montana too. But I was speaking about the Fargo that is North Dakota. After a poster mentioned North Dakota.....

I can highlight that portion of Rancos post in which he mentioned North Dakota if that helps you in any way? It's just above my post but I'm happy to do it if it helps your comprehension in your older age....

My post was "dripping with sarcasm".
 
just an update on one point, or rather a citation. fauci said masks were not going to help on march 8th, on 60 minutes. again, it is one of the reasons i have little respect for him: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-fauci-outdated-video-masks/fact-checkoutdated-video-of-fauci-saying-theres-no-reason-to-be-walking-around-with-a-mask-idUSKBN26T2TR
 
Back
Top