Jesse said:
Ummmm... He probably stepped down from the post before accepting the job?
Kind of like you can't work at Pizza Hut AND Dominoes at the same time, even though that would be really cool for you!
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
No one knows where people are getting infected
- Thread starter PlayerRep
- Start date
Ummmm... He probably stepped down from the post before accepting the job?
Kind of like you can't work at Pizza Hut AND Dominoes at the same time, even though that would be really cool for you!
Yeah right. I’m pretty sure he can’t step down from a government job to take another government job he wasn’t eligible for because of his first job. Lol Barr has some splaining to Trump to do and then he’s gonna be tweet fired tonite. The wheels keep coming off your theories.Cuervohola said:
Ah, this should be fun... 3 Congress Demons participate in an ANTI-SEMITE symposium... Ilhan Omar and Betty McCollum of Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan.
"Congress should reprimand three of its members for participating with financiers of Islamic terrorism in a conference sponsored by an anti-Semitic group with deep ties to Hamas, the Palestinian extremist group that calls for eradicating the state of Israel."
Meanwhile, here in this lowly forum, Jesse loves Ilhan Omar, says Omar should be picked to be VP when Harris assumes her throne after pushing Sleepy China off the cliff.
Why don't you ever talk about your love of Omar since I busted you for that, Jesse?
https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/three-members-of-congress-star-in-forum-with-terror-financiers-anti-semites/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=corruption+chronicles&utm_term=members&utm_content=20201203000146
"Congress should reprimand three of its members for participating with financiers of Islamic terrorism in a conference sponsored by an anti-Semitic group with deep ties to Hamas, the Palestinian extremist group that calls for eradicating the state of Israel."
Meanwhile, here in this lowly forum, Jesse loves Ilhan Omar, says Omar should be picked to be VP when Harris assumes her throne after pushing Sleepy China off the cliff.
Why don't you ever talk about your love of Omar since I busted you for that, Jesse?
https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/three-members-of-congress-star-in-forum-with-terror-financiers-anti-semites/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=corruption+chronicles&utm_term=members&utm_content=20201203000146
Jesse said:
Still with the Girl acronym. That's fine, whatever.
I haven't been a fan of either AG, but he won't be fired.
Cuervohola said:
I’m not an Omar voter, l live in a different state. I just predicted what Harris and the rest of the socialist/Marxist/anti-fa demons would do to own you Trumpers. Snap! You fellas better start hoarding your ammo and canning your veggies, winter is coming and it’s going to be long (at least 12 years, Harris will still have two terms after she serves out Biden’s first term, think LBJ, he was illegible but didn’t run for his second term) and dark, no more fossil fuel only solar and wind. You know the whole green deal thing all electric cars and of course universal healthcare, immigration reform, a wealth tax on the millionaire class, free college and trade school education, government funded universal day care, what else do we need? Anyone, come on chime in what else are the Trumpers again?lol
sdk.catfish
Well-known member
CDA - you know very well that we are a nation that no longer needs links or any semblance of truth to make outlandish statements and pass them off as fact. Your missing what I did there which was classic Trump. First you say, "Many people have said (usually meaning some Fox commentator or Qanon)" which is absolves you of any responsibility and then you come up with absurd bizarre lies. It's Trump's gift to the nation that just keeps on giving. Don't worry, you will get the hang of it as it becomes more and more the norm.
Jesse said:
Nope! You had plenty of chances to explain yourself, but you waited days until the evidence was too immense. You're an Anti-Semite racist, ACCORDING TO YOU and GRIZ PHAN. You called me out, but then didn't even figure out your dream pick for VP is an Anti-Semite... HAHAHAHAHA. It doesn't get any more PRICELESS than that!
And I quote Sunday November 29 1132 PM:
"Sorry rep but you got schooled by Box. You keep falling for Cuervo’s batshit crazy QAnon posts. Why do you give him any credence, he posts anti-Semitic bullshit rather then call him out you chime in talking smack to Box and karma slapped you across the face for it. “Saying that the media is owned by the Jews is no more racists then saying there are a lot of blacks in pro sports. It’s a fact.” No it is not a fact it’s just more tired racists tropes from a forever Trumper, but he don’t care cause he’s a real ‘merican. I believe you are better then that, or not. Lol"
The rest of your post is jibberish at best.
Jesse said:
Durham was not appointed under the special counsel law. Was picked and made subject to it. Just like Mueller.
"On Dec. 1, Attorney General William Barr announced that he had appointed John Durham, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut, as a special counsel to investigate the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Though Barr appointed Durham formally on Oct. 19, he did not notify Congress until December. What statutory authority did Barr have to make this appointment? And how does that authority compare with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller in 2017?
Barr and Rosenstein, respectively, appointed Durham and Mueller pursuant to the same three statutes: 28 U.S.C § 509, § 510, and § 515. The first statute vests broad supervisory powers in the attorney general, while the second statute authorizes the attorney general to delegate his powers to subordinates. The third statute is the most important for present purposes. Section 515 empowers the attorney general to authorize a “special assistant”—though not a “special counsel”—to conduct “any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings.” Both the Durham and Mueller appointments contain the same, critical sentence: “If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.” This provision will allow Durham to bring federal prosecutions during the Biden presidency."
[This was just a mistake by you, and not your usual exaggeration or lie. You just don't do your homework. I hope you level of practicing law is higher than your posting on egriz. Your egriz posting would be malpractice.]
https://www.lawfareblog.com/statutory-authority-barrs-appointment-durham-special-counsel
Jesse said:
OH! There is more Racism by you. Not only don't you fight my obvious destruction of everything you say, you act like a whipped kid. I have had Jewish, Black, Brown, Indian, Muslim, Mixed, Gay, whatever friends. None of us ever gave a shit what we were, none of us chose what we were when we were born. Most of the people I talk about I grew up with or served with in my Army Units. The only people we wouldn't accept are Woke little termites like you.
Now, to my generation, the saying "Jews will not replace me and you, right?" is a joke, because we don't have micro aggression feelings and aren't offended easily.
To your "Woke" and "Cancel Culture" generation that is micro aggression sensitive and furious when one of us makes fun of the LQYBFSTHS alphabet, the saying "Jews will not replace me and you, right?" IS RACIST!!!!
So you ONCE again just outed yourself as a RACIST ANTI-SEMITE according to none other than yourself and GRIZ PHAN if he or she is still watching.
I would not reply, you have dug yourself in real good, Kid.
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
Cuervohola said:
Thanks
Are you sure counsel? Explain to the court why Barr isn’t bound by 600.03, and why Biden can’t fire him like a regular USA when a new administration takes over or have his new AG issue a different order of appointment and end the investigation on January 20? That was the point of my post, that his appointment was illegal and won’t last long, it will end with the new administration. He can’t be appointed “special counsel“ because he was a sitting USA, consequently anything he does in his investigation is done simply in his capacity as a special assistant to the AG. So there’s that.PlayerRep said:
I don’t think you even read Barr’s order of appointment or the article you linked to. Why did you leave out the section discussing 600.03? You are misleading your readers who don’t bother to read the article you linked to. That’s sharp practice counsel. It’s an illegal appointment but it can’t be challenged or changed until Biden is sworn in. There’s a better more in-depth analysis of it in Abram’s Law & Crime blog. Will be interesting to wait and see who’s correct, the snowflake or the accountant. Lol can we bookmark this for late January or early February.
Ps. I predict Durham resigns and hands it off to a minion to sign or sends it back to justice to wind up because he’s got nothing and he knows it and he doesn’t want to look like a loser because Trump built up all this hysteria around it. Barr oversold Durham to Trump from the beginning. He used him like a pacifier to shut Trump up because he knew Trump’s continued ranting was eroding confidence in his beloved DOJ. Barr is nothing if not an institutionalist. He’s not a Trumper and never has been. He wanted to be AG so he could push his nutty unitary executive fetish. He appoints Durham so Trump thinks he now his own special counsel to go after all his deep state enemies and it shuts him up about the Russia investigation. He played him like a child. Barr is a lot smarter then Trump and I’m a lot smart then you. Lol.
Jesse said:
It was not illegal for Barr to do what he did with Durham. It just wasn't. For example, the special counsel for the Place/Scooter Libby matter, Fitzgerald, was a sitting US Attorney. "U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed Special Counsel on December 30, 2003.[5]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair_grand_jury_investigation. As I said, you must be a horrible attorney. You exaggerate, lie and make mistakes in almost every substantive thing you post.
Yes, Durham could be fired, just like Mueller could have been fired. That could happen, but Biden et al would take huge heat for doing that, just like Trump et al would have if they had fired Mueller.
Don't think Durham will resign. He told Barr he would take the appointment Barr gave it, so that he could finish his investigation,.
I agree that Barr is not a Trumper.
The Durham report will be very interesting.
Latest posts
-
-
2027 Montana Recruiting (18) Verbals & (22) Offers (2) 2028 Offers- Latest: alabamagrizzly
-
-
