BadlandsGrizFan
Well-known member
I don't think it looks so different. Kinda hard to tell at that angle tho. I'm sure it will look good
This! Some people will always find something about which to complain.BadlandsGrizFan said:Everybody's right. We should have just cut out the old logo with box cutters and glued it to the new field like the cats did. Cuz that looked so much freaking better.
Quit bitching people
G&B said:Yukon said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/UMGRIZZLIES_FB/status/760574387804180480[/tweet]
It could just be me but that does not look Maroon!
dupuyer griz said:Here's a question and keep in mind, it's just a question. With this turf costing north of 400,000 and needing to be replaced every 8-10 years, what were we spending to keep the grass up? It seems like a lot, but I don't know. I like it a lot, but from a money aspect, is it saving or costing? I know many athletes like grass from a safety aspect on knees and toes as well. On the other hand, hitting the ground on the field in Conrad and the other 1B fields may as well have been concrete.
havgrizfan said:The new turf and endzones looks so nice. Just an awesome enhancement to Wash-Griz.
grizatwork said:havgrizfan said:The new turf and endzones looks so nice. Just an awesome enhancement to Wash-Griz.
Was in town this weekend and hiked the M this morning. It looks fantastic. It is an upgrade over the sprinturf. It pops now. The sprinturf always looked a little drab to me. The endzones look great too. You guys are worrying over nothing. It is definitely an upgrade.
grizatwork said:havgrizfan said:The new turf and endzones looks so nice. Just an awesome enhancement to Wash-Griz.
Was in town this weekend and hiked the M this morning. It looks fantastic. It is an upgrade over the sprinturf. It pops now. The sprinturf always looked a little drab to me. The endzones look great too. You guys are worrying over nothing. It is definitely an upgrade.
Its keeping with the PC culture of not being judgmental (since hash marks would enable teams to be judged). Instead of whether you actually got far enough to make the first down, your success will be measured on your approach to getting there. If you can justify the method you used then you'll be awarded a first down. Think of it as "Common Core meets football"... Oh the joys of Progressivism.Ursa Major said:I hate it! For that kind of money, you'd think they would put in hash marks and numbers. Kent Haslam is ruining this program!!
dupuyer griz said:Here's a question and keep in mind, it's just a question. With this turf costing north of 400,000 and needing to be replaced every 8-10 years, what were we spending to keep the grass up? It seems like a lot, but I don't know. I like it a lot, but from a money aspect, is it saving or costing? I know many athletes like grass from a safety aspect on knees and toes as well. On the other hand, hitting the ground on the field in Conrad and the other 1B fields may as well have been concrete.
:lol: :lol: :clap:Grisly Fan said:Its keeping with the PC culture of not being judgmental (since hash marks would enable teams to be judged). Instead of whether you actually got far enough to make the first down, your success will be measured on your approach to getting there. If you can justify the method you used then you'll be awarded a first down. Think of it as "Common Core meets football"... Oh the joys of Progressivism.Ursa Major said:I hate it! For that kind of money, you'd think they would put in hash marks and numbers. Kent Haslam is ruining this program!!
Cost analysis of natural grass vs Field Turf.mtgrizzly said:From what I remember reading awhile ago, it is actually cheaper going with the field turf. No more paying to watering it, fertilizing it, weed control, mowing, painting the lines, #'s, and logos, and overall payroll for the people that would take care of the field.