Stop_HammerTime69
Well-known member
They also don't have a good stadium, and they did have a good season in 2024.But Sam Houston sure is
They also don't have a good stadium, and they did have a good season in 2024.But Sam Houston sure is
They also lost to D2 national champion CSU Pueblo in 2014.They also don't have a good stadium, and they did have a good season in 2024.
Way too many very poor programs in the FCS with under 8K in attendance. Awful idea.I would support G5 and FCS combining for one big mid major College Football subdivision.
Tiny anecdote.I notice Cooper Kupp will be in the SB tomorrow. It was fun watching him both here and in Cheney. I wonder if anybody from Laramie will be playing tomorow.
I think it's $5 MM to the MWC and $5 MM to the NCAA.Scuttlebutt is NDSU is paying the MWC $10 million to join
And they'll recoup it year one.I think it's $5 MM to the MWC and $5 MM to the NCAA.
MONTANA is most certainly not Sam HoustonBut Sam Houston sure is
Broadcasters and advertisers don't care one bit about the number of people in an area.
They care about the number of people whose asses are planted on their couch with their remote locked on one channel. Simply look at the ratings for the semifinal. I guarantee advertisers took notice.
You aren’t too pessimistic. You are realistic. The math doesn’t math even though some are just dead set on a pie in the sky dream. Idaho is an example that is closer to Montana teams than Boise State. Heck Boise State might experience some trouble with this new era of college football. It’s an absolute mess and lots more will change in the next five years. Crazy to run head long into a rapidly evolving situation, than to be a little patient to find a feasible path forward. One may come some time in the future and I hope it does. Now is not the time.Ok, but if we both moved up would viewership be consistent during regular season games outside of Montana folks? I may be wrong, but most folks are tuning into their respective teams. If we were on TV at the same time as bigger programs are people watching? Maybe I'm too pessimistic....
Except Kent is fully on record saying Montana NEEDS to go FBS (I never say "up" because UM beats the vast majority of G6 teams right now). The money is absolutely there.The semifinal was playoff football. You won’t get that audience moving up. Montana doesn’t have the money. Help us understand where the money is coming from? Seriously, where? Montana cannot even afford the entry expenses for moving up, yet alone the extra schollies and travel expenses associated with them. Montana, nor Montana State aren’t growing their fan bases enough to pay for a move up. Your vision of dollars pouring in with TV/streaming is pie in the sky. I wonder if anyone at either university would speak up if they believed moving up was profitable? Nah, they would just be complacent. Sorry, I know people
want to move up. I really do. It just doesn’t make financial sense. BTW, I wouldn’t take a higher paying job if I had to pay money to get it and then was at threat of financial ruin because my expense load was astronomical - just to say I got a promotion. Nonsensical.
Somebody might want to show the budget that shows where all the money is going to come from. It doesn’t exist as far as I know and there isn’t a snowballs chance in Hades that the BOR supports moving up.Except Kent is fully on record saying Montana NEEDS to go FBS (I never say "up" because UM beats the vast majority of G6 teams right now). The money is absolutely there.
What will devastate the athletic department financially is when UM is third tier. We'll lose attendance, and no one is paying $86 a seat to watch central Washington year after year. We'll lose what tiny tv revenue we get at his level. We'll lose advertisers and sponsors.
At that point, we'll be looking to cut programs, and as I stated earlier, I'd then hope it would be football so we could become a regional power in BB and soccer.
More than anything else, Kent just needs to say literally anything.Except Kent is fully on record saying Montana NEEDS to go FBS (I never say "up" because UM beats the vast majority of G6 teams right now). The money is absolutely there.
What will devastate the athletic department financially is when UM is third tier. We'll lose attendance, and no one is paying $86 a seat to watch central Washington year after year. We'll lose what tiny tv revenue we get at his level. We'll lose advertisers and sponsors.
At that point, we'll be looking to cut programs, and as I stated earlier, I'd then hope it would be football so we could become a regional power in BB and soccer.
Or one might just look at the 50 G6 programs with lower attendance and much lower ticket prices than UM who are thriving financially at that level and assume there must be plenty of money coming from somewhere. Those programs -- to my knowledge-- don't have a printing press cranking out Franklins, so they're balancing their budgets somehow.Somebody might want to show the budget that shows where all the money is going to come from. It doesn’t exist as far as I know and there isn’t a snowballs chance in Hades that the BOR supports moving up.
Me too.More than anything else, Kent just needs to say literally anything.
I would miss football.
This is why Montana will never move up.I think it's $5 MM to the MWC and $5 MM to the NCAA.
Do you think South Dakota State is next? UND really dragged their feet on the D2 to FCS move.This is why Montana will never move up.
I wonder if anyone at either university would speak up if they believed moving up was profitable? Nah, they would just be complacent.
That’s fantastic for him. Eastern sucks and is constantly contemplating discontinuing athletics entirely. I don’t believe we belong in a conference with them.Efton Chism is a rookie out of EWU playing wide receiver on the Patriots.
NO UC Davis and Sac State are nextDo you think South Dakota State is next? UND really dragged their feet on the D2 to FCS move.
Attendance and ticket prices are only two metrics out of many that must be considered. What are the enrollments of those 50 other programs you reference? What do they charge their students in athletic fees? How much money do they receive from their state budget?Or one might just look at the 50 G6 programs with lower attendance and much lower ticket prices than UM who are thriving financially at that level and assume there must be plenty of money coming from somewhere. Those programs -- to my knowledge-- don't have a printing press cranking out Franklins, so they're balancing their budgets somehow.
And would you agree revenue will fall precipitously if UM is suddenly a third-tier program?