Hurdlingriz
Well-known member
Wheel route! They'll try that once or twice and probably just run with 9-10 blockers, can we stop that?
uofmman1122 said:Those 8 points were absolutely nothing like the 14 special teams points MSU gave up, though! They're fixating on them because they were an insanely anomalous, record-setting sequence of mistakes that MSU had no part in causing!Bear Spray said:Hmm, likely because Griz fans are fixated on the 4 plays, & MSU gave up 14 points vs the 8 Weber gave up. Outside of 2 Weber drives, MSU dominated the game, (Weber rushed for 181 & 14/30 passing for 151 Cats rushed for 347, 15/23 for 140) but it was played in the rain & was a sloppy outing from both teams. I"m looking forward to this weekend & expect both teams to play a clean game Saturday. I also expect the Cats to win. Just not sure which Cats.
I'm not going to say you guys lose if those don't happen. I think you probably do, but the game could go completely different. Lots of teams dominate the stat sheet and still lose. It happens a lot. I just do not understand why so many cat fans across the fandom insist that the 2 special teams touchdowns are in any way similar to the 4 safeties. They just aren't, and when you insist they are, people are going to call you out and make a bigger deal about it. Sometimes it's okay to just admit your team got really lucky.
As for this week, I expect the cats to win because I think they are playing better now than they were when they first played Weber, but this thread isn't about the cats or Weber, so I'll just leave it there. :lol:
If the alternative to the safeties is punting, then the cats get the same number of possessions.Mavman said:uofmman1122 said:Those 8 points were absolutely nothing like the 14 special teams points MSU gave up, though! They're fixating on them because they were an insanely anomalous, record-setting sequence of mistakes that MSU had no part in causing!
I'm not going to say you guys lose if those don't happen. I think you probably do, but the game could go completely different. Lots of teams dominate the stat sheet and still lose. It happens a lot. I just do not understand why so many cat fans across the fandom insist that the 2 special teams touchdowns are in any way similar to the 4 safeties. They just aren't, and when you insist they are, people are going to call you out and make a bigger deal about it. Sometimes it's okay to just admit your team got really lucky.
As for this week, I expect the cats to win because I think they are playing better now than they were when they first played Weber, but this thread isn't about the cats or Weber, so I'll just leave it there. :lol:
The 4 safties are huge not only because of 8 points but the 4 additional possessions after each one .
uofmman1122 said:If the alternative to the safeties is punting, then the cats get the same number of possessions.Mavman said:The 4 safties are huge not only because of 8 points but the 4 additional possessions after each one .
uofmman1122 said:A kickoff return and punt return in the same game is less rare than 2 safeties in one game, let alone 4, but it still has nothing to do with my point.AZGrizFan said:Objectively? Because they’re both similarly rare. And to have TWO returns in the same game is even more rare. Probably not more rare than 4 safeties but still incredibly rare.
MSU did literally nothing to gain those safeties. Weber had to execute those returns.
Sure, you've forced 232 punts in the last three seasons and still somehow only have 5 bad snaps resulting in points.ilovethecats said:uofmman1122 said:A kickoff return and punt return in the same game is less rare than 2 safeties in one game, let alone 4, but it still has nothing to do with my point.
MSU did literally nothing to gain those safeties. Weber had to execute those returns.
Well we had to force them to punt in the first place. I’d think a griz fan would know all to well how difficult it can be to force the other team to punt. Even once……![]()
uofmman1122 said:Sure, you've forced 232 punts in the last three seasons and still somehow only have 5 bad snaps resulting in points.ilovethecats said:Well we had to force them to punt in the first place. I’d think a griz fan would know all to well how difficult it can be to force the other team to punt. Even once……![]()
I can appreciate the nice dig at our terrible defense, though.
ilovethecats said:uofmman1122 said:A kickoff return and punt return in the same game is less rare than 2 safeties in one game, let alone 4, but it still has nothing to do with my point.
MSU did literally nothing to gain those safeties. Weber had to execute those returns.
Well we had to force them to punt in the first place. I’d think a griz fan would know all to well how difficult it can be to force the other team to punt. Even once……![]()
WaGriz4life said:ilovethecats said:Well we had to force them to punt in the first place. I’d think a griz fan would know all to well how difficult it can be to force the other team to punt. Even once……![]()
8 points and 80 yards minimum of field position on completely unforced errors
ilovethecats said:WaGriz4life said:8 points and 80 yards minimum of field position on completely unforced errors
Unforced errors they couldn’t have made if we hadn’t forced them to punt. And believe me, some teams can really struggle to force a team to punt. Sometimes even once in a game….
Credit to our defense forcing them to punt so often.
AZGrizFan said:ilovethecats said:Unforced errors they couldn’t have made if we hadn’t forced them to punt. And believe me, some teams can really struggle to force a team to punt. Sometimes even once in a game….
Credit to our defense forcing them to punt so often.
A) How many times did Oregon State Punt? :lol:
B) You made Weber punt 5 times. 4 of those ended in a safety. Griz made Weber punt 7 times. ZERO of those ended in a safety.
Your point?
ilovethecats said::lol:
Just pointing out that while those safeties were bizarre, and will never happen again, they were able to have a chance to happen because they were punting. If they never had to punt, because our defense couldn’t stop them even a single time, they never would have had 4 safeties.
In the end it won’t matter. I’ll let people enjoy saying it’s the one single reason the Cats won that day. By tomorrow afternoon we’ll know. If we get zero safeties, which I expect, and beat them, which I also expect; I’ll be happy with that.
If they come in, play a clean game, don’t have any terrible snaps resulting in points, and beat us at home, I’ll be more inclined to believe the 8 points we got was the sole reason Weber lost that day.
I think we beat them by a couple scores tomorrow.
CDAGRIZ said:ilovethecats said::lol:
Just pointing out that while those safeties were bizarre, and will never happen again, they were able to have a chance to happen because they were punting. If they never had to punt, because our defense couldn’t stop them even a single time, they never would have had 4 safeties.
In the end it won’t matter. I’ll let people enjoy saying it’s the one single reason the Cats won that day. By tomorrow afternoon we’ll know. If we get zero safeties, which I expect, and beat them, which I also expect; I’ll be happy with that.
If they come in, play a clean game, don’t have any terrible snaps resulting in points, and beat us at home, I’ll be more inclined to believe the 8 points we got was the sole reason Weber lost that day.
I think we beat them by a couple scores tomorrow.
Well, they lost by 5, and spotted you 8 (which you admit will never happen again). I know there are a lot of plays in a football game. That's obvious. It's also obvious that the Bobs would've lost without the four safeties because math.
profisme said:CDAGRIZ said:Well, they lost by 5, and spotted you 8 (which you admit will never happen again). I know there are a lot of plays in a football game. That's obvious. It's also obvious that the Bobs would've lost without the four safeties because math.
And lots of people in this site are saying if Lucas Johnson hadn’t been injured, the Griz would have beaten Weber and Sac St. By that logic, the Cats would have have had a larger margin of victory if Sean Chambers had played for MSU.
CDAGRIZ said:ilovethecats said::lol:
Just pointing out that while those safeties were bizarre, and will never happen again, they were able to have a chance to happen because they were punting. If they never had to punt, because our defense couldn’t stop them even a single time, they never would have had 4 safeties.
In the end it won’t matter. I’ll let people enjoy saying it’s the one single reason the Cats won that day. By tomorrow afternoon we’ll know. If we get zero safeties, which I expect, and beat them, which I also expect; I’ll be happy with that.
If they come in, play a clean game, don’t have any terrible snaps resulting in points, and beat us at home, I’ll be more inclined to believe the 8 points we got was the sole reason Weber lost that day.
I think we beat them by a couple scores tomorrow.
Well, they lost by 5, and spotted you 8 (which you admit will never happen again). I know there are a lot of plays in a football game. That's obvious. It's also obvious that the Bobs would've lost without the four safeties because math.
ilovethecats said:CDAGRIZ said:Well, they lost by 5, and spotted you 8 (which you admit will never happen again). I know there are a lot of plays in a football game. That's obvious. It's also obvious that the Bobs would've lost without the four safeties because math.
:lol:
You guys are great over here! Good luck tomorrow.