• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

NCAA... crap or get off the crapper!

BWahlberg said:
kemajic said:
BWahlberg said:
Total guess here but I'm thinking the NCAA has in hand:

- All sorts of information from player interviews on some rather minor infractions involving meals, etc. Mostly tailgate/game day food would be my guess based on the stern "don't feed players after games" memo all tailgate pass owners received.

- The Barz report

- The Donaldson verdict

- Some other statements/info from a few boosters/former players/etc

What I bet they're waiting on is the Johnson trial and if the Dept of Ed or DOJ release any reports in the meanwhile. If you look back at other investigations they relied heavily on other groups reports to help them make their punishment decisions. While it's on a different level if you look back the NCAA slapped Penn St I think less than 1 week after the Sandusky trial ended. They could be looking to move on a similar path.
I suspect they may frown on Foley taking Johnson and Kemp to the booster attorney in the tasing case as well. There were questions from Gwen as to whether he did that for non-athletes. You can bet she reported that to NCAA. It put him out to pasture.

That would be an issue if that were true, however that was a 2nd meeting with the attorney who was already hired by the families. The players were not being escorted by the AD to a booster attorney but were brining the AD to the booster attorney they'd already hired.
Who mentioned the AD?
 
kemajic said:
Since you have so much real life experience in the NAIA, you finally said something with some credibility.

:lol:

"It's deep, Dan, and I don't think it's playable."
 
Just because its all clear to you PR, doesn't mean its clear to anyone else including the NCAA. I'm sure you have the answers to kemps extended ineligibilty this fall too. (Despite the questions in regards to attorneys and who bailed him out of jail.)

One of the "go to lawyers" is a booster but makes it clear his services will be full price from the get go. I wouldn't exactly say he is a "friend" of the University (or at least of FORMER Dean Couture)
 
When did Jim Foley serve as the AD? Last I checked Jim O'Day was the AD at that time and I don't recall hearing when he escorted anyone to a law office. I might be wrong on this but I don't recall O'Day being involved in that aspect of the situation with Kemp and T Johnson.
 
Gaeilge1 said:
When did Jim Foley serve as the AD? Last I checked Jim O'Day was the AD at that time and I don't recall hearing when he escorted anyone to a law office. I might be wrong on this but I don't recall O'Day being involved in that aspect of the situation with Kemp and T Johnson.
does it really matter?
 
Cats2506 said:
Gaeilge1 said:
When did Jim Foley serve as the AD? Last I checked Jim O'Day was the AD at that time and I don't recall hearing when he escorted anyone to a law office. I might be wrong on this but I don't recall O'Day being involved in that aspect of the situation with Kemp and T Johnson.
does it really matter?


To you? Probably not.

Facts/Reality/Honesty/Credibility. Not words typically associated with you.
 
Back
Top