• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

MSU vs. Sac State.

lost_soul said:
If MSU had a defense they would be a pretty damn good team.
Click to expand...
The MSU defense is playing great. They have held them to one touchdown. The other touchdown was a prukop pick 6.
 
Not sure to enjoy this much offense or not? Both defenses are looking bad and upsetting me . At least the Cat's defense gets just enough stops to help their offense. Prukop and Safron are sure fun to watch. They and Adams will be interesting challenges to determine exactly how good our defense is. I will consider holding any of the 3 teams under 30 a good defensive showing.
 
Kinda unrelated and of no consequence but I dont like the helmets the sCats are wearing, Looks like the logo is a little over sized and just starts to wrap around the back and the player number on the other
 
I question whether our O can score enough points to stay with either of these teams. We think our D is great and they are very good but without an offense putting some points on the board we could be in for a long day.

The Cats got another great QB. And both these teams have good receivers. The Griz sure don't have a lock on talent anymore.
 
indian-outlaw said:
lost_soul said:
If MSU had a defense they would be a pretty damn good team.
Click to expand...
The MSU defense is playing great. They have held them to one touchdown. The other touchdown was a prukop pick 6.
Click to expand...

Aside from flowers their secondary is suspect. And even with spies they can't contain safron.
 
lost_soul said:
indian-outlaw said:
lost_soul said:
If MSU had a defense they would be a pretty damn good team.
Click to expand...
The MSU defense is playing great. They have held them to one touchdown. The other touchdown was a prukop pick 6.
Click to expand...

Aside from flowers their secondary is suspect. And even with spies they can't contain safron.
Click to expand...
Yea, I spoke to soon. Sac State is turning it up. This is going to be a good game, not sure who will win..
 
MSU's lead is down to 3. It's 38-35. They've been trading scores, Sac and Saffron are picking MSU apart, while MSU is running all over Sac
 
Saffron is killing it. Receivers are really going up for the ball. Nice to see when a qb has some time to throw.
 
lost_soul said:
indian-outlaw said:
lost_soul said:
If MSU had a defense they would be a pretty damn good team.
Click to expand...
The MSU defense is playing great. They have held them to one touchdown. The other touchdown was a prukop pick 6.
Click to expand...

Aside from flowers their secondary is suspect. And even with spies they can't contain safron.
Click to expand...

Target Barnett's side of the field, that guys lazy.
 
On sides kick recovered by Sac after an MSU player touches it when it goes 7 yards up field. Big Sky refs swoop in and remind us why they suck and call it MSU's ball. I believe they claim MSU didn't touch it. Replay shows opposite. MSU catches a break.
 
signedbewildered said:
Pretty certain that onside kick should have been ruled recovered by SAC or was it just my TV?
Click to expand...

Yeah should have been, cat announcers on TV even think so. MSU gets lucky!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top