Nah, let's just stick with the one-year deals. Maybe we can get Jerry Glanville or Ryan Leaf.
GrizPDX said:What I don't like about this move is that the UM and their administration is rewarding just making the playoffs. I am not saying that I don't think Mick is the man for the job or that he can't lead us to a National Championship, but with this move it is giving the impression that solely making the playoffs is enough for this program. I think all coaches, players and fans would agree that this is the case, so why is the administration on board?
The Regents will never give the UM Football coach $300,000 per year until such time as they are willing, and can afford to pay the MSU Football coach the same. You may not like it, but that is the way things are done.Fahque said:http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65004&view=unread#p932937" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;'68griz said:This!!!!!!!!AllWeatherFan said:BDizzle said:I just hope we don't get in the habit of these 1 year extensions. Leaves a lot of uncertainity for the coach, assistant coaches, current players, and recruits. Lets have a plan!
NDSU signed Bohl to an 8-year contract extension through 2021, with a base salary this year of $206,000.
UM needs to get real.
griz4life said:The most important thing about this announcement is the timing. Pay attention Griz recruits.
maroonandsilver said:The Regents will never give the UM Football coach $300,000 per year until such time as they are willing, and can afford to pay the MSU Football coach the same. You may not like it, but that is the way things are done.Fahque said:http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65004&view=unread#p932937" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;'68griz said:This!!!!!!!!AllWeatherFan said:NDSU signed Bohl to an 8-year contract extension through 2021, with a base salary this year of $206,000.
UM needs to get real.
BDizzle said:I just hope we don't get in the habit of these 1 year extensions. Leaves a lot of uncertainity for the coach, assistant coaches, current players, and recruits. Lets have a plan!
grizatwork said:I have not always liked some of the football decisions of this staff, but I am so grateful to Mick for what he did for this program the past 2 years. He helped right the ship. Players seem to really respect the heck out of him. Regardless of the contract, I would like to thank Mick for coming out of retirement and stepping into the storm that was Grizzly football at the time. I also don't think you can underestimate what he has done for Canada to get him in the right direction both on and off the football field.
Hammer said:Good coach and more importantly a good man. He forgot more about football than the combined membership of this entire board. Good for him, he has worked very hard for this. :clap:
montana_jack said:Say what you want, but the facts are he took over the helm at the worst time in Griz football history and got the boys through it. He's 10-2 this year and we're looking at making a run in the playoffs. He flat-out deserves the extension.
No doubt. Well-deserved, and great job getting this done.Buttegrizzle said:montana_jack said:Say what you want, but the facts are he took over the helm at the worst time in Griz football history and got the boys through it. He's 10-2 this year and we're looking at making a run in the playoffs. He flat-out deserves the extension.
This. I don't want UM to become one of those unstable programs that let's winning coaches go because they didn't win the NC every year or two. Much as I would love to, that ain't happening. MD has done everything we could have realistically hoped for in these past two seasons. Anyone tells you 10-2 isn't good hasn't looked at our actual records over the past 20 years. Very few seasons with 2 or less wins despite our playoff successes.
grizindabox said:GrizPDX said:What I don't like about this move is that the UM and their administration is rewarding just making the playoffs. I am not saying that I don't think Mick is the man for the job or that he can't lead us to a National Championship, but with this move it is giving the impression that solely making the playoffs is enough for this program. I think all coaches, players and fans would agree that this is the case, so why is the administration on board?
Coming off a 5-6 season and missing the playoffs 2 of the last 3 years, not to mention the shit storm that was encountered, I see no problem with the thinking to reward a 10-2 playoff season. I understand the questions people have about MD, but based on the results, it is not a out-of-the-question move.