These stats certainly scream Griz dominance in the Big Sky, but do they scream Griz Greatness? Certainly 7 NC appearance is very good, but 2-5 in those games is more mediocre than great. Two NC's good, but not great in 7 attempts. But you also have to look at the teams that Montana played in those games . . . many have moved on to FBS, some very good competition. How often have the Griz had a clean BSC record and a #1 seed for a relatively easy bracket until the semis? Many times due to a relatively weak BSC, and very good Griz teams with few losses.
Do the stats in the past quarter century speak to the Griz greatness vs. the FCS, or relative weakness by the rest of the Big Sky vs. the FCS? I have to say that Montana has faced a relatively weak Big Sky during this stretch, but 19 consecutive does speak for itself. Dominating BSC football? Yes Domination of Resources vs. the rest of the BSC? Yes, for sure.
I do believe that the rest of the Big Sky has climbed up to more closely join the Griz in the last 5 years, and the rest of the Big Sky has climbed up to compete more strongly on a national level too. I also feel that the strength of FCS football has clearly shifted from the east to the west, and this shift will be further solidified with some of the FCS exits in the SoCon and CAA. The Big Sky, with multiple teams, will share in the west's dominance in the foreseeable future.
For an outsider, it's actually refreshing to see a Big Sky where 5 teams are all capabile of winning the conference title . . . vs. being assured the Griz would win it, and tryng to figure out what other team would finish 2nd. Maybe Griz dominance will return in the BSC, but I'm impressed with the FB being played at Mt St, EWU and CP.