Looks like an extra, in depth campus visit for players that the coaches are interested in targeting.
Umista said:We always had many young men that were offered various "rides" to come to the program and at least half of these guys washed out the first season for various reasons. I took the simple write up by Kyle that Sir Stitt is attempting to stop the large group of players that we signed but were marginal to begin with not only in skill but the mental aspect as well.
Camps are a very good way to get the feel for the young men and their family. The kids get to see what the hell they are getting into. I know of many kids that attend numerous camps and some have fathers with deep pockets and I wonder how the poor families deal with this issue. When "free" Bernie becomes president all of this will even out. Until then...
UMGriz75 said:By relying "more" on camps, if we did or did not in the past, increasing reliance on camps creates a different problem, it increases a "selection bias." It's a great way to see potential recruits, and that's the obvious upside,and you'd love to get all the kids you'd ever want to recruit to YOUR camp. But, good luck. Does increasing reliance on "camps" to any substantial degree -- if that is what was translated into English in the recent article -- expand or diminish the high-end recruitment pool?Umista said:I know of many kids that attend numerous camps and some have fathers with deep pockets and I wonder how the poor families deal with this issue.
UMGriz75 said:SoldierGriz said:I'm not sure I fully understand the "change" in recruiting philosophy.
The Griz coaches are going to do extensive homework by reviewing tape, talking to coaches/teachers about work ethic and grades, calling recruits, and inviting them to camp. They will not hand-out offers "like candy." Instead they will focus their offers on the recruits who stand out in camp, and meet or exceed the coaches criteria.
I guess I assumed they did all of these things before...I certainly hope they did.
What did I miss?Well, for those who argued or ignored the importance of these camps financially, in discussions about "coach salaries," the fact that the head coach "owns" the camps and this June's camps, as i had noted, are on tap for about 1,000 participants at $150 or more each, it should be obvious (by now) how much these can contribute to the coach's salary, and to the coach's discretion to pay his assistants and boost their off-salary incomes as well. It's big bucks."We’re not just saying, ‘Hey, come to camp so we can make money,'" Montana director of opperations [sic] Colin Bonnicksen said. "We’re saying come to camp to see if you’re going to be a guy who we want to offer a scholarship to."
Kyle did a nice job describing what these camps are all about, and why everybody does them, but you are also correct: is there something exceptional here, or is this what "coaches in general do?" I don't know any FCS school that hands out offers "like candy" and I am glad that UM will focus offers on recruits that "stand out in camp," but jeez folks exactly what are they saying here that is actually "news"? There's a little bit here of the "Coach is going to look for quarterbacks that are fast and accurate!" school of worship as though no coach had ever thought of that before.
I would like to know, is there anything unique, different of distinctive about UM's camps this year, that is distinctive from prior years or from other schools? The "tone" of the article suggests there is, the "substance" of the article fails to identify it. How much do they actually receive from these camps? From the reporting angle, where does the money go, how is it allocated? Are the camps open to the public?
Kyle did a nice job describing why camps are important for the coaches, different from watching films etc., stuff that all makes sense, but then where do the kids generally come from, is there any kind of geographical or talent distinction? Does a kid have to qualify in any sort of way, or can any kid sign up? Are kids invited? Who? On what basis? Is there a typical percentage of offers that might be made in camp of 1,000 kids? How do these work at other FCS schools by comparison, if there is a comparison?
Missing from the article was any sense of the fact that these are called "camps," but that the perspective was from the standpoint of coaches doing recruiting, as an "evaluation tool." Do the kids get anything out of these camps? Do the coaches offer anything that benefits the typical kid coming to camp?
What is the ratio of recruits made from "camps" compared to recruitment made in other ways? What are the NCAA rules about "camps," the recruitment process and period. It might also be useful for the general reader to know why FCS and FBS camp rules are different. How do these camps differ from satellite camps? Are the goals or outcomes different?
Questions that a former Sports Editor might ask.
Umista said:Clarkblues is referring me to the redundancy dept? My reply wont fit the programs intent.
Redundancy?
GrizzlyClaw said:UMGriz75 said:SoldierGriz said:I'm not sure I fully understand the "change" in recruiting philosophy.
The Griz coaches are going to do extensive homework by reviewing tape, talking to coaches/teachers about work ethic and grades, calling recruits, and inviting them to camp. They will not hand-out offers "like candy." Instead they will focus their offers on the recruits who stand out in camp, and meet or exceed the coaches criteria.
I guess I assumed they did all of these things before...I certainly hope they did.
What did I miss?Well, for those who argued or ignored the importance of these camps financially, in discussions about "coach salaries," the fact that the head coach "owns" the camps and this June's camps, as i had noted, are on tap for about 1,000 participants at $150 or more each, it should be obvious (by now) how much these can contribute to the coach's salary, and to the coach's discretion to pay his assistants and boost their off-salary incomes as well. It's big bucks."We’re not just saying, ‘Hey, come to camp so we can make money,'" Montana director of opperations [sic] Colin Bonnicksen said. "We’re saying come to camp to see if you’re going to be a guy who we want to offer a scholarship to."
Kyle did a nice job describing what these camps are all about, and why everybody does them, but you are also correct: is there something exceptional here, or is this what "coaches in general do?" I don't know any FCS school that hands out offers "like candy" and I am glad that UM will focus offers on recruits that "stand out in camp," but jeez folks exactly what are they saying here that is actually "news"? There's a little bit here of the "Coach is going to look for quarterbacks that are fast and accurate!" school of worship as though no coach had ever thought of that before.
I would like to know, is there anything unique, different of distinctive about UM's camps this year, that is distinctive from prior years or from other schools? The "tone" of the article suggests there is, the "substance" of the article fails to identify it. How much do they actually receive from these camps? From the reporting angle, where does the money go, how is it allocated? Are the camps open to the public?
Kyle did a nice job describing why camps are important for the coaches, different from watching films etc., stuff that all makes sense, but then where do the kids generally come from, is there any kind of geographical or talent distinction? Does a kid have to qualify in any sort of way, or can any kid sign up? Are kids invited? Who? On what basis? Is there a typical percentage of offers that might be made in camp of 1,000 kids? How do these work at other FCS schools by comparison, if there is a comparison?
Missing from the article was any sense of the fact that these are called "camps," but that the perspective was from the standpoint of coaches doing recruiting, as an "evaluation tool." Do the kids get anything out of these camps? Do the coaches offer anything that benefits the typical kid coming to camp?
What is the ratio of recruits made from "camps" compared to recruitment made in other ways? What are the NCAA rules about "camps," the recruitment process and period. It might also be useful for the general reader to know why FCS and FBS camp rules are different. How do these camps differ from satellite camps? Are the goals or outcomes different?
Questions that a former Sports Editor might ask.
My three boys attended the youth camp last year in June. They loved it. Very positive attitude from players and coaches. I am sure the high school camp was much more intense. I will know more as my oldest son will participate at that camp this year as a freshman. I always wondered why Montana did not have youth camps.
I'm guessing DTs.cclarkblues said:Umista said:Clarkblues is referring me to the redundancy dept? My reply wont fit the programs intent.
Redundancy?
Well, you did post it 3 times... :roll:
snap said:Speaking of Kyle Sample, I went back and watched a couple of those "Griz Tracks" vids that he does with AJ. The sexual tension is palpable.
Ursa Major said:snap said:Speaking of Kyle Sample, I went back and watched a couple of those "Griz Tracks" vids that he does with AJ. The sexual tension is palpable.
So true. Strangely, I always detect a subtle but distinctive musky scent whenever I watch them.
snap said:Speaking of Kyle Sample, I went back and watched a couple of those "Griz Tracks" vids that he does with AJ. The sexual tension is palpable.
UMGriz75 said:SoldierGriz said:I'm not sure I fully understand the "change" in recruiting philosophy.
The Griz coaches are going to do extensive homework by reviewing tape, talking to coaches/teachers about work ethic and grades, calling recruits, and inviting them to camp. They will not hand-out offers "like candy." Instead they will focus their offers on the recruits who stand out in camp, and meet or exceed the coaches criteria.
I guess I assumed they did all of these things before...I certainly hope they did.
What did I miss?Well, for those who argued or ignored the importance of these camps financially, in discussions about "coach salaries," the fact that the head coach "owns" the camps and this June's camps, as i had noted, are on tap for about 1,000 participants at $150 or more each, it should be obvious (by now) how much these can contribute to the coach's salary, and to the coach's discretion to pay his assistants and boost their off-salary incomes as well. It's big bucks."We’re not just saying, ‘Hey, come to camp so we can make money,'" Montana director of opperations [sic] Colin Bonnicksen said. "We’re saying come to camp to see if you’re going to be a guy who we want to offer a scholarship to."
Kyle did a nice job describing what these camps are all about, and why everybody does them, but you are also correct: is there something exceptional here, or is this what "coaches in general do?" I don't know any FCS school that hands out offers "like candy" and I am glad that UM will focus offers on recruits that "stand out in camp," but jeez folks exactly what are they saying here that is actually "news"? There's a little bit here of the "Coach is going to look for quarterbacks that are fast and accurate!" school of worship as though no coach had ever thought of that before.
I would like to know, is there anything unique, different of distinctive about UM's camps this year, that is distinctive from prior years or from other schools? The "tone" of the article suggests there is, the "substance" of the article fails to identify it. How much do they actually receive from these camps? From the reporting angle, where does the money go, how is it allocated? Are the camps open to the public?
Kyle did a nice job describing why camps are important for the coaches, different from watching films etc., stuff that all makes sense, but then where do the kids generally come from, is there any kind of geographical or talent distinction? Does a kid have to qualify in any sort of way, or can any kid sign up? Are kids invited? Who? On what basis? Is there a typical percentage of offers that might be made in camp of 1,000 kids? How do these work at other FCS schools by comparison, if there is a comparison?
Missing from the article was any sense of the fact that these are called "camps," but that the perspective was from the standpoint of coaches doing recruiting, as an "evaluation tool." Do the kids get anything out of these camps? Do the coaches offer anything that benefits the typical kid coming to camp?
What is the ratio of recruits made from "camps" compared to recruitment made in other ways? What are the NCAA rules about "camps," the recruitment process and period. It might also be useful for the general reader to know why FCS and FBS camp rules are different. How do these camps differ from satellite camps? Are the goals or outcomes different?
Questions that a former Sports Editor might ask.
UMGriz75 said:The biggest reason is likely that kids recruited at age 17 can change a lot by the time they are going on 18-19, and including the biggest social and cultural changes of their lives. Unless and until "coaches" become expert physiologists and psychologists, those "reasons" can't change "much."Umista said:We always had many young men that were offered various "rides" to come to the program and at least half of these guys washed out the first season for various reasons.
Mousegriz said:Hey Kyle....work on getting some headline spell checkers over at that fine newspaper. The little article about "evaluating" titled "evalute". Bet those juniors parents can't wait to get their kids into UM's fine journalism program/
And another headline from the Missoulian I laughed at last week "bonaza spells". "Bonanza" should be spelled correctly.......especially if "spells" is the word right new to it.
AZGrizFan said:Mousegriz said:Hey Kyle....work on getting some headline spell checkers over at that fine newspaper. The little article about "evaluating" titled "evalute". Bet those juniors parents can't wait to get their kids into UM's fine journalism program/
And another headline from the Missoulian I laughed at last week "bonaza spells". "Bonanza" should be spelled correctly.......especially if "spells" is the word right new to it.
I love it when someone criticizes someone else's spelling, and then misspells a word in their criticism. :lol: :lol:
UMGriz75 said:The biggest reason is likely that kids recruited at age 17 can change a lot by the time they are going on 18-19, and including the biggest social and cultural changes of their lives. Unless and until "coaches" become expert physiologists and psychologists, those "reasons" can't change "much."Umista said:We always had many young men that were offered various "rides" to come to the program and at least half of these guys washed out the first season for various reasons.