• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Kitties vs. Spuds Game thread (combined threads)

Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Choate praised the defensive effort. Of course, what does he know? He's only been a defensive coach for his entire professional life.
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

A rational and articulate explanation of a prior post. Surely, that'll be good enough for 75 and Playa, right?
 
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Choate praised the defensive effort. Of course, what does he know? He's only been a defensive coach for his entire professional life.
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

We all realize that the only fun for fans in beating the Cats in the Brawl, or posting things about them on egriz is their reaction to it. Same with PR. If it he can't figured that out well than let him wear out a thousand keypads because it won't go away until he lets it.
 
Well, in yet another oncoming thread derailment, let's try and keep this one on the game, and not various poster's agendas about other poster's agendas.
 
There is little doubt that the Cat defense is different. Whether it is better or worse than previous years is too early to tell. But the classic TG defense was well on display last night; give up two big pass plays early, make adjustments, give up big run yardage the rest of the game, hope the offense scores more than the defense gives up. If the offense gets big runs to begin with then the above order will be reversed and a significant amount of passing yards will be given up.
One thing for sure is that under Ty their defense will always play hard.

I did think that the Cat offensive line looked good most of the game. That may be their most impressive unit, but depth could be a problem. By comparison the defensive line for Idaho will have to improve dramatically to even be called inept.

All in all this was a good effort for the Cats and they should come away feeling good about it. They still have a long long way to go but they should feel pride in what they did last night.
 
Gaeilge1 said:
There is little doubt that the Cat defense is different. Whether it is better or worse than previous years is too early to tell. But the classic TG defense was well on display last night; give up two big pass plays early, make adjustments, give up big run yardage the rest of the game, hope the offense scores more than the defense gives up. If the offense gets big runs to begin with then the above order will be reversed and a significant amount of passing yards will be given up.
One thing for sure is that under Ty their defense will always play hard.

I did think that the Cat offensive line looked good most of the game. That may be their most impressive unit, but depth could be a problem. By comparison the defensive line for Idaho will have to improve dramatically to even be called inept.

All in all this was a good effort for the Cats and they should come away feeling good about it. They still have a long long way to go but they should feel pride in what they did last night.

Ty should be elated with the bozeman state offense & the Idaho QB. Didn't they have nearly 40 minutes in TOP? That's huge for a Gregorak defense and let's face it, Linehan played about as erratically as you could have hoped and kept state in the game. Petrino's got a Umista-sized boat load of work to do to get that ship righted.
 
Ursa Major said:
PlayerRep said:
EverettGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
Cat D gave up 132 yards in 2d half. 209 after first quarter. 0 points in 2d half. 3 points after the first quarter.

Sure, TG doesn't make adjustments. Some of you UM posters are truly idiots, and obviously never played the game and know absolutely nothing about it. You are embarrassments to Griz football and to yourselves.


35 for 211, at 6.4 ypc.

If the spudniks had had a QB who could throw at the Little Grizzly level, that game is a blowout. You can't give up 211, 6.4 and call it a successful defensive effort.

Taking into account that you don't know much about the game and never played, I will try to explain some things to you.

Holding Ida to 0 points in the 2d half, 3 points after the first quarter, and 20 points for the game is good. Last season, no Cat opponent gained fewer yards and only one (SS) scored fewer points, excluding Fort Lewis. Holding Ida to 2-11 in 3d down conversions and 0-3 4th down conversions is very very good. Getting the pick on the goal line late in the game is also very good. Yes, the very good Ida running back had several too many longer (and very nice) runs, which resulted in the nice run average for Ida.

Choate praised the defensive effort. Of course, what does he know? He's only been a defensive coach for his entire professional life.
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.

My posts were directed at the Cat defensive performance, not TG, and at some totally stupid and incorrect posts. Why do people like you have to keep making it about TG? Can you not read? Are you one of people who can't acknowledge that the Cat D had a pretty good performance and considerably better than all or most of its performances last year? Maybe the best way to clean up stuff is for people like you to make non-stupid football posts and stop making everything about TG, or something that other's posts are not about. Look in the mirror, buddy.
 
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Choate praised the defensive effort. Of course, what does he know? He's only been a defensive coach for his entire professional life.
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

You can't read. My posts were all or largely about the Cat defense. It was a Cat/Idaho game and thread. It's is you who can't see what is going on. I can see that I am going to get hired, again, of your BS pretty soon, as I have in the past. You are too biased to even read what is said in the posts.
 
Cotton-eyed Hoe said:
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

A rational and articulate explanation of a prior post. Surely, that'll be good enough for 75 and Playa, right?

No, it was an inarticulate and off-base post. It misanalysed the situation. Surely, you can see that, right?
 
mrknowitall said:
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

We all realize that the only fun for fans in beating the Cats in the Brawl, or posting things about them on egriz is their reaction to it. Same with PR. If it he can't figured that out well than let him wear out a thousand keypads because it won't go away until he lets it.

What you point out is an indication of posters who never played the game, and don't understand it. Not universal, but an indication.
 
Gaeilge1 said:
There is little doubt that the Cat defense is different. Whether it is better or worse than previous years is too early to tell. But the classic TG defense was well on display last night; give up two big pass plays early, make adjustments, give up big run yardage the rest of the game, hope the offense scores more than the defense gives up. If the offense gets big runs to begin with then the above order will be reversed and a significant amount of passing yards will be given up.
One thing for sure is that under Ty their defense will always play hard.

I did think that the Cat offensive line looked good most of the game. That may be their most impressive unit, but depth could be a problem. By comparison the defensive line for Idaho will have to improve dramatically to even be called inept.

All in all this was a good effort for the Cats and they should come away feeling good about it. They still have a long long way to go but they should feel pride in what they did last night.

The sophomore who gave up the 2 early longer passes, which really were probably just lucky passes, is the kid who made the great interception on the goal line late in the game.
 
Disillusion hasn't sunk in yet with little brother. I've read "Idaho has an outside chance at the Rose Bowl"... :werd:
 
OK OK I understand the game was bad to the bone. Could a none pissed E-Griz fan post the final score please?
I have been out of the USA W/O Radio or TV. I will sneak into a TV area for our Saturday evening game and back to Montana for our remaining season
Thanks ahead of time!
 
Umista said:
OK OK I understand the game was bad to the bone. Could a none pissed E-Griz fan post the final score please?
I have been out of the USA W/O Radio or TV. I will sneak into a TV area for our Saturday evening game and back to Montana for our remaining season
Thanks ahead of time!
20-17 UI
 
PlayerRep said:
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Ursa Major said:
Is this a one off or are we going to have to endure an entire season of your hackneyed and cherry picked analysis of Tyler Gregorak's defensive coaching performance? If the latter, please consider a thread dedicated to the subject.
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

You can't read. My posts were all or largely about the Cat defense. It was a Cat/Idaho game and thread. It's is you who can't see what is going on. I can see that I am going to get hired, again, of your BS pretty soon, as I have in the past. You are too biased to even read what is said in the posts.


I thought you had work PR......looking for someone's BS to "hire" you......or can't I read either?
 
PlayerRep said:
mrknowitall said:
Ursa Major said:
UMGriz75 said:
Well, on a thread about the Cats' first game, the observations are not only appropriate, but certainly a big boost for Cat hopes on that end of the game. It's only one game, but no matter how much people who suddenly came to disparage TG bitch about him, this game didn't give them anything to work with.
That's not the question or the context of my post. Some posters have regularly disparaged TG. PR has regularly defended TG. It is now an agenda for him. PR doesn't usually easily let go of these agendas.They become about him and he will wear the f***[*] keypads off of his phone posting about this agenda all season long.

We all realize that the only fun for fans in beating the Cats in the Brawl, or posting things about them on egriz is their reaction to it. Same with PR. If it he can't figured that out well than let him wear out a thousand keypads because it won't go away until he lets it.

What you point out is an indication of posters who never played the game, and don't understand it. Not universal, but an indication.

I thought the MSU D played pretty well. TG seemed to have the right game plan. His blitz calls looked pretty effective IMO, especially on some of the passing plays. But please PR, Ursa has gotta point about your enthusiasm for everything TG. Jeez.....
 
Back
Top