Just heard

[indian-outlaw]

I was under the impression that JJ's redshirt was burned his freshman year, then when Selle went down JJ backed up Roper, and played sparingly. Werent alot of people pretty upset when Pflu did this? I remember it being discussed on here quite a bit.

Exactly! That means he was not redshirted, he played as a true freshman leaving his redshirt still available.

 

[Cats2506]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is priceless :thumb:

 

[Umista]

10 to 20 days ago the accuser did in fact get in touch with JJ! I do not know anything concerning what was talked about nor do I have any other information. I have no information about anything else, the info. was spot on and thats all I know.

 

[kemajic]

JJ has no more redshirt....Correct me if im wrong here, but just because he transfers that doesn't mean he gets the redshirt back.

Have you read the thread? You are wrong. His redshirt has never been used, so it's not clear what you mean by getting it back. It is still available to him - 5 years to play four. He can redshirt and still have two years elligibility wherever he goes.

I have read the thread, and Im positive Pflu burned the redshirt, then played him a few times after Selle was injured.

You can't get the concept that a player has five years to play four? The redshirt is not limited to the first year. If a player plays as a true freshman, a redshirt remains available for any subsequent year. The Growler term of "burning" a redshirt by a freshman playing, is misleading and seems to have gotten you. A redshirt is used or "burned" only when the player uses it - completes one of the five years without playing. While the freshman year is by far the most common use of the redshirt, several examples have been posted of players using their redshirts in later years that you must have missed. Example Tripp, last year; example Pennington, etc. The former burned a reshirt his third year; the latter, his second. Lex Hilliard had a redshirt available when he had the Achilles incident, so he did not have to go the medical redshirt application route, which can be difficult. His fourth year. We likely would have never seen Jimmy Wilson back had he used his redshirt. Instead, he only had to apply for a one year special extension of the five years; I'm sure two would have been rejected.

JJ used elligibility as a true freshman and as a true sophmore. If he transfers and redshirts 2012, he will only then burn his redshirt and have his two years of ellibility remaining.

 

[hm.grwn.grizfan]

JJ has no more redshirt....Correct me if im wrong here, but just because he transfers that doesn't mean he gets the redshirt back.

Have you read the thread? You are wrong. His redshirt has never been used, so it's not clear what you mean by getting it back. It is still available to him - 5 years to play four. He can redshirt and still have two years elligibility wherever he goes.

I have read the thread, and Im positive Pflu burned the redshirt, then played him a few times after Selle was injured.

You can't get the concept that a player has five years to play four? The redshirt is not limited to the first year. If a player plays as a true freshman, a redshirt remains available for any subsequent year. The Growler term of "burning" a redshirt by a freshman playing, is misleading and seems to have gotten you. A redshirt is used or "burned" only when the player uses it - completes one of the five years without playing. While the freshman year is by far the most common use of the redshirt, several examples have been posted of players using their redshirts in later years that you must have missed. Example Tripp, last year; example Pennington, etc. The former burned a reshirt his third year; the latter, his second. Lex Hilliard had a redshirt available when he had the Achilles incident, so he did not have to go the medical redshirt application route, which can be difficult. His fourth year. We likely would have never seen Jimmy Wilson back had he used his redshirt. Instead, he only had to apply for a one year special extension of the five years; I'm sure two would have been rejected.

JJ used elligibility as a true freshman and as a true sophmore. If he transfers and redshirts 2012, he will only then burn his redshirt and have his two years of ellibility remaining.

Thanks for the clarity.

 

[WaGriz4life]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is priceless :thumb:

I agree. Unbelievable

 

[I'mHuntinBobKats]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is priceless :thumb:

Still Trollin Pussy Cat?

FTC!

 

[poiuyter]

2010 he played as a true freshman. So he did not use a redshirt year. The only way to get all the eligibilty is to transfer down, not be enrolled in school for 2 years or to NAIA or get a wavier. Big Sky Conference rules that transferring from one member to another member is a lose of one year of eligibility and need the former school to allow it.

All this information can be found on the internet. Amazing isn't it.

 

[GoGriz14]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is priceless :thumb:

I agree. Unbelievable

It is ridiculous that so called football "fans" who are interested enough to read a football message board cannot grasp the concept of a redshirt.

 

[cclarkblues]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

this is priceless :thumb:

I agree. Unbelievable

It is ridiculous that so called football "fans" who are interested enough to read a football message board cannot grasp the concept of a redshirt.

This is a little like watching the Three Stooges argue about cold fusion.

 

[poiuyter]

Scissors cuts Paper, Paper covers Rock, Rock crushes Lizard, Lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes Scissors, Scissors decapitates Lizard, Lizard eats Paper, Paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes Rock, and as it always has, Rock crushes Scissors!

 

[Proud Griz Man]

As a dedicated Griz fan I hope JJ has a great career with the Griz or does not ever beat the Griz. If he leaves, I wish him well. I know JJ had some mediocre games, but I will alway remember the Weber game and the roll his Grizzly offense got on for the latter part of the 2011 season.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTdXeO40_9M[/youtube]

 

[catsack]

Have you read the thread? You are wrong. His redshirt has never been used, so it's not clear what you mean by getting it back. It is still available to him - 5 years to play four. He can redshirt and still have two years elligibility wherever he goes.

I have read the thread, and Im positive Pflu burned the redshirt, then played him a few times after Selle was injured.

You can't get the concept that a player has five years to play four? The redshirt is not limited to the first year. If a player plays as a true freshman, a redshirt remains available for any subsequent year. The Growler term of "burning" a redshirt by a freshman playing, is misleading and seems to have gotten you. A redshirt is used or "burned" only when the player uses it - completes one of the five years without playing. While the freshman year is by far the most common use of the redshirt, several examples have been posted of players using their redshirts in later years that you must have missed. Example Tripp, last year; example Pennington, etc. The former burned a reshirt his third year; the latter, his second. Lex Hilliard had a redshirt available when he had the Achilles incident, so he did not have to go the medical redshirt application route, which can be difficult. His fourth year. We likely would have never seen Jimmy Wilson back had he used his redshirt. Instead, he only had to apply for a one year special extension of the five years; I'm sure two would have been rejected.

JJ used elligibility as a true freshman and as a true sophmore. If he transfers and redshirts 2012, he will only then burn his redshirt and have his two years of ellibility remaining.

Thanks for the clarity.

What people usually mean when saying they burned there redshirt year is, the player played in a very limited role as a true freshman. So a burnt redshirt year is basically wasted on 15-50 plays. So if he would have redshirted he possibly would have been a four year starter versus now a three year starter.

 

[kemajic]

I have read the thread, and Im positive Pflu burned the redshirt, then played him a few times after Selle was injured.

You can't get the concept that a player has five years to play four? The redshirt is not limited to the first year. If a player plays as a true freshman, a redshirt remains available for any subsequent year. The Growler term of "burning" a redshirt by a freshman playing, is misleading and seems to have gotten you. A redshirt is used or "burned" only when the player uses it - completes one of the five years without playing. While the freshman year is by far the most common use of the redshirt, several examples have been posted of players using their redshirts in later years that you must have missed. Example Tripp, last year; example Pennington, etc. The former burned a reshirt his third year; the latter, his second. Lex Hilliard had a redshirt available when he had the Achilles incident, so he did not have to go the medical redshirt application route, which can be difficult. His fourth year. We likely would have never seen Jimmy Wilson back had he used his redshirt. Instead, he only had to apply for a one year special extension of the five years; I'm sure two would have been rejected.

JJ used elligibility as a true freshman and as a true sophmore. If he transfers and redshirts 2012, he will only then burn his redshirt and have his two years of ellibility remaining.

Thanks for the clarity.

What people usually mean when saying they burned there redshirt year is, the player played in a very limited role as a true freshman. So a burnt redshirt year is basically wasted on 15-50 plays. So if he would have redshirted he possibly would have been a four year starter versus now a three year starter.

It was not the redshirt that was burned; it was a year of elligibility. In JJ's case, a year of elligibility was burned in 2010; the redshirt remains available. So "what people usually mean when say the burned their redshirt" obviously is a confusing statement to a lot of people on this board.

 

[kemajic]

the roll his Grizzly offense got on for the latter part of the 2011 season.

Which was going to continue for two more years....

 

[BWahlberg]

Can fans must be rolling with how many confused posts there are in here... smh...

 

[snap]

JJ is transfering to Caroll and is projected to start against Portland St.

 

[griz692002]

Maybe I am missing something but has her name came out yet? If she is going to pull off an ultimatum like that then why don't all you geniuses here on egriz vow to run her out of town? Why aren't we putting the fear in her as she is to JJ.



Personally I think she is a bimbo with her head screwed on backwards. I have seen how these jersey chasers flaunt there young assets. then try to get there way or I will tell and I can ruin your life. Well bad decisions were made on both parties but she should get the same as she is dishing out.



shoot I could go on for hours on this someone please tell me her name. I would like to see some info on her.



where she grew up?

who her parents are?

what do they do for a living?

where she lives ?

who her friends are?

what classes she is attending?

what is her major?

does she have a criminal record



She should wake every morning as uncomfortable as JJ does. when she goes to the donut shop people should look at her and wonder the same things about her as they do about JJ.

 

[TxGriz]

also, THE girl dropping everything if JJ leaves Montana is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It just doesn't work that way. Sorry, not accusing inflitrator of making this stuff up, but it just doesn't work like that. SHE doesn't get to just up and decide something like that so I'm not buying that one either.

Exactly. I haven't been able to connect the dots - all of this flap and then it ends with Jordan Johnson being given the option to leave town as if nothing ever happened, or stay and face criminal prosecution. That isn't her choice to make for one thing, and if she is charging rape then why would she drop the charges if JJ agrees to skip town? What is to stop him from returning? This is such nonsense.

Main Hall and BOR saw this as serious enough to fire two administrators to put a third out to pasture and then they are OK with a plea bargain that allows an option of complete exoneration without facing a trial? Bullshit, either she says she was raped or drop the charges and give JJ his life back.

 

[griz692002]

i totaly agree