Grizfan-24 said:There are ways to get JLM involved, but Cal Poly's desire not to revisit the problems they faced in 16 played a bigger role in him not getting touches. Cal Poly prefers man defense, and because they were crowding the line of scrimmage the bubble and jet sweep stuff probably weren't good schematic choices. If teams play softer, and have zone drops versus man responsibilities, then those options look a lot better.
They ran a ton of RPO stuff against Poly, moreso than they had in the prior few weeks. RPO is excellent against man because the stick and the slant routes that are common are great man beaters. As teams press the line of scrimmage to take a way fast screen these types of RPO options are better for possession.
The TE's got a bit more use against CP than they might otherwise because of that man coverage and the lack of a discernable pass rush from CP. Traditionally speaking TE routes are either quick (stick/choice/seam routes) or super slow developing (Under Sam Over Mike Routes and those types) that require pass protection and are a bit fraught with danger (small windows).
The point is that JLM and GS didn't get as much work because of what CP chose to do defensively. My guess is that we'll see a bit more JLM/GS this week against PSU because their defense (at least historically) sets up well.
Please post more. You are spot on