grizpaws said:He needs to exhaust his administrative appeals and then he has the right to seek judicial review of the administrative decisions (at which time he can raise any constitutional arguments he has about ex post facto application of new rules and due process). But look, he and his attorneys know that his case is currently being reviewed by the prosecutor. I would assume his attorneys would not let him waive any 5th amendment rights and testify or speak at the U hearing (anything he said could be fodder for his prosecution). So, the "evidence" at the U hearing would not likely include any statement or rebuttal from Johnson. Given the lower burden of proof at the U, the result doesn't surprise me. However, Johnson and his legal advisors have to be looking at the potential criminal prosecution and I would think therefore want to keep the administrative process ongoing.
+1
We have those posters ready to get a bunk ready in Dear Lodge, others that want to blame the coed and still others who just want to forget about it and talk about who the replacement will be. We are (again) going to just have to let the process play out.
BTW, does anyone know the "right" ratio for anti-depressants to red beer?