JJ Trial

[spokaneman]

it takes two to tango and not everyone is telling the truth, but on the surface everyone is quick to blame the guy. I thought it use to be "innocent until proven guilty", not guilty until proven innocent. Her statements and actions just don't add up. Is JJ totally innocent, probably not but a rapist, no.

It Takes 2 to tango????......

NOT WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED you friggen tool!!

"Is JJ totally innocent, probably not...."

that is what plea bargains are for....

Gimme a break. I don't believe #1's point was to suggest that JJ did anything criminal, but rather that he wasn't an angel either. If every man that treats women worse than they expect had to plea to charges, the race would cease to exist, because there'd be no men left on the outside to procreate.

But I suspect you know all that, and are just busy trolling away as always.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Honestly - I am not trolling in the least!! When someone says that "It takes 2 to tango" in a rape trial, I felt the need to point out how big of a dumba$$ he is....

Angel or not I don't know nor I could care less.... This entire trial comes down to one simple question.. DID - SHE - SAY - NO!!!... now if "EVERY MAN" says "ya she said no but.....", then we have a REAL problem on our hands.... but I don't suspect EVERY MAN can put himself in that category now can he....

 

[RobGriz]

it takes two to tango and not everyone is telling the truth, but on the surface everyone is quick to blame the guy. I thought it use to be "innocent until proven guilty", not guilty until proven innocent. Her statements and actions just don't add up. Is JJ totally innocent, probably not but a rapist, no.

It Takes 2 to tango????......

NOT WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED you friggen tool!!

"Is JJ totally innocent, probably not...."

that is what plea bargains are for....

Gimme a break. I don't believe #1's point was to suggest that JJ did anything criminal, but rather that he wasn't an angel either. If every man that treats women worse than they expect had to plea to charges, the race would cease to exist, because there'd be no men left on the outside to procreate.

But I suspect you know all that, and are just busy trolling away as always.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Honestly - I am not trolling in the least!! When someone says that "It takes 2 to tango" in a rape trial, I felt the need to point out how big of a dumba$$ he is....
Angel or not I don't know nor I could care less.... This entire trial comes down to one simple question.. DID - SHE - SAY - NO!!!... now if "EVERY MAN" says "ya she said no but.....", then we have a REAL problem on our hands.... but I don't suspect EVERY MAN can put himself in that category now can he....

So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

 

[GrizBear]

I'll just go back to living my life whatever happens.

You have 524 posts on eGriz. No one believes you have a life.

Luckily comments from Egrizzers are not meaningful in the real world and thus are not definitive of my life.

Jerry Punch
Full time eGrizzer
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:49 am

 

[EverettGriz]

I am not trolling in the least

:roll:

You have 48 posts on this board.

You've trolled precisely 48 times.

 

[UMGriz75]

Directly, however once again the Jury completed the day with another odd take on Doe left ringing in its ears, one that may have undone the whole day for the State:

"Paoli: You would expect her to avoid clothes she wore that night?

"DC: Yeah.

"Paoli: She wore them for months."

1) the clothes had been removed during whatever happened
2) i bet she still drove in the same car and lived in the same house, too. she probably wears her hair in a similar fashion. how odd!

I gather you missed the testimony that she did, in fact, move out of the house because of the "bad memories there?" See: second roommate testimony detail.

Isn't this your typical angry bias overlooking actual facts of the case in order to fabricate your own?

 

[RobGriz]

I'll just go back to living my life whatever happens.

You have 524 posts on eGriz. No one believes you have a life.

Luckily comments from Egrizzers are not meaningful in the real world and thus are not definitive of my life.

Jerry Punch
Full time eGrizzer
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:49 am

Damn...you almost have to take the laptop to the crapper to get numbers that high.

 

[spokaneman]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

 

[EverettGriz]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

Jesus, I've never seen anyone hyperbolize as much as you. If you were within shouting distance of reasonable, maybe people would take you a little more seriously.

 

[spokaneman]

I am not trolling in the least

:roll:

You have 48 posts on this board.

You've trolled precisely 48 times.

And you have 8474... so you WIN.... I guess!! :thumb:

 

[RobGriz]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

How do you there was a rape committed? Is that not the point of the trial? YOU cannot be sure that the "2 to tango" is NOT appropriate anymore than you can be sure that there WAS a rape.

And yes, I was specifically refering to every rape that ever occured anywhere on a thread about the Jordan Johnson rape trial. :roll:

 

[EverettGriz]

I am not trolling in the least

:roll:

You have 48 posts on this board.

You've trolled precisely 48 times.

And you have 8474... so you WIN.... I guess!! :thumb:

Let's see. As a Griz fan, I've been a member -- of a Griz board!! -- for over 8 years. As an ewoo fan, you've been a member -- of a GRIZ board -- for 8 days.

Oh wait. They don't teach math that JC.

 

[spokaneman]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

Jesus, I've never seen anyone hyperbolize as much as you. If you were within shouting distance of reasonable, maybe people would take you a little more seriously.

Ok, I will bite... Please tell al of us how refuting the Statement "It Takes 2 to Tango" when describing a possible RAPE is being unreasonable in the least.. Please impress us with your vast knowledge...

 

[grizpack]

Wonder why the Missoulian is not providing a play by play on their Twitter feed today??

 

[Sportin' Life]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

How do you there was a rape committed? Is that not the point of the trial? YOU cannot be sure that the "2 to tango" is NOT appropriate anymore than you can be sure that there WAS a rape.

And yes, I was specifically refering to every rape that ever occured anywhere on a thread about the Jordan Johnson rape trial. :roll:

The thing is if someone says 'rape' and you say 'it takes two to tango', then you are really saying that the rape didn't happen. The statement presupposes that rape didn't actually happen, since rape is by definition not 'taking two to tango'.

You can argue that rape didn't happen in this case, but if you put 'it takes two to tango' as a defense of rape, you would be better off addressing the facts of the case rather than a fatuous aphorism.

 

[EverettGriz]

OFFS.

Did I mention that comment at ALL in my post??

This is what I mean by reasonable. The entire post we're referencing was an analogy. My post was to suggest that you'd misread the analogy to believe the poster was saying JJ had committed some crime. I really don't give 2 shits about how many people tango. I do, however, care about a troll with an agenda suggesting that a plea bargain should have occurred, when it appears very likely no crime occured.

 

[PolsonGrizFan]

Wonder why the Missoulian is not providing a play by play on their Twitter feed today??

Because they've finally figured out the actual twitter feed contradicts what story they wish to paint. It's a reality vs. fantasy thing.

 

[spokaneman]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

How do you there was a rape committed? Is that not the point of the trial? YOU cannot be sure that the "2 to tango" is NOT appropriate anymore than you can be sure that there WAS a rape.

oh good lord... you mental midgets love chasing your tail....

Aren't you one that is Admonishing the very existence of a trial in the first place??

 

[RobGriz]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

How do you there was a rape committed? Is that not the point of the trial? YOU cannot be sure that the "2 to tango" is NOT appropriate anymore than you can be sure that there WAS a rape.

And yes, I was specifically refering to every rape that ever occured anywhere on a thread about the Jordan Johnson rape trial. :roll:

The thing is if someone says 'rape' and you say 'it takes two to tango', then you are really saying that the rape didn't happen. The statement presupposes that rape didn't actually happen, since rape is by definition not 'taking two to tango'.

You can argue that rape didn't happen in this case, but if you put 'it takes two to tango' as a defense of rape, you would be better off addressing the facts of the case rather than a fatuous aphorism.

I don't think anyone, especially me, is saying that. What I AM saying is that at this point no one know if it was a rape or consensual and while the "two to tango" statement might have been in poor taste the truth of the matter is that it might come down to two people consenting and then one getting pissed about it. Not saying that is what is going to happen but none of us knows.

Just my opinion, but you would have to be the WORST defense lawyer in the history of the world to use "it takes two to tango" as a defense in a rape case.

 

[Jerry Punch]

I'll just go back to living my life whatever happens.

You have 524 posts on eGriz. No one believes you have a life.

Luckily comments from Egrizzers are not meaningful in the real world and thus are not definitive of my life.

Jerry Punch
Full time eGrizzer
Posts: 525
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:49 am

Good work, but in the end, meaningless.

 

[Griz2k]

[So, in your opinion, he is guilty?

Not at all. I was SIMPLY pointing out the fact that WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED, the stronger of the 2 usually finishes that Tango with an unwilling dance partner....

So, in your opinion Rape NEVER HAPPENS?....

Jesus, I've never seen anyone hyperbolize as much as you. If you were within shouting distance of reasonable, maybe people would take you a little more seriously.

Ok, I will bite... Please tell al of us how refuting the Statement "It Takes 2 to Tango" when describing a possible RAPE is being unreasonable in the least.. Please impress us with your vast knowledge...

I think you're forgetting that she wasn't "forcibly raped". She admits that she assisted in the process, thus, the "tango".