• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

grizbrokebacker1 said:
NorthEndZoneDan said:
grizindabox said:
a-bad-tats-28.jpg


NOTHING LIKE PONIES :coffee:
Dont show that to Brint... for the love of God please dont show him this...

You mean that's not Brint?

Those ponies would be a lot fatter if that was me.

But my reaction to seeing that tattoo?

53935%20-%20double_rainbow%20meme%20puke%20rainbow%20rainbow_dash%20throwing_up%20vomit.jpg
 
I once spent the night at my TAs apartment while I went to the UM. Somehow the professor found out and we both were given a stern lecture how it was not appropriate or fair for other students. Ah I miss college.
 
PolsonGrizFan said:
Paoli's burning up too much time w/ DC. Get DC out of there and move on.
Disagree. Paoli knows he can punch holes in the PTSD diagnosis and he needs to do it now. DC appears to be the state's prime "expert" witness who is claiming PTSD. If Paoli makes her look the fool, and he appears to be doing a good job of that, the state will have a hard time convincing the jury that PTSD is the always-available excuse for the bizarre behavior of Jane Doe.
 
spokaneman said:
grizare#1 said:
it takes two to tango and not everyone is telling the truth, but on the surface everyone is quick to blame the guy. I thought it use to be "innocent until proven guilty", not guilty until proven innocent. Her statements and actions just don't add up. Is JJ totally innocent, probably not but a rapist, no.

It Takes 2 to tango????......
NOT WHEN RAPE IS INVOLVED you friggen tool!!

"Is JJ totally innocent, probably not...."

that is what plea bargains are for....


Gimme a break. I don't believe #1's point was to suggest that JJ did anything criminal, but rather that he wasn't an angel either. If every man that treats women worse than they expect had to plea to charges, the race would cease to exist, because there'd be no men left on the outside to procreate.

But I suspect you know all that, and are just busy trolling away as always.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Actually I'd say the Counselor is holding up pretty well..... Kinda took the wind out of paolis sails when she called him a bully The she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context.... She pretty much ignores them
 
tnt said:
Actually I'd say the Counselor is holding up pretty well..... Kinda took the wind out of paolis sails when she called him a bully The she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context.... She pretty much ignores them

Exactly, Paoli should've quit while he was ahead. Poke a few holes and get her off the stand.
 
tnt said:
Actually I'd say the Counselor is holding up pretty well..... Kinda took the wind out of paolis sails when she called him a bully The she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context.... She pretty much ignores them

Could you be any more biased against JJ? Your agenda to convict is so transparent. Did JJ piss on your flower bed or something?
 
BDizzle said:
I once spent the night at my TAs apartment while I went to the UM. Somehow the professor found out and we both were given a stern lecture how it was not appropriate or fair for other students. Ah I miss college.
My wife and I once spent a night at the Granite Park Chalet in Glacier Park. Man, those walls were paper thin. Staying in the room next to us was a male professor and his male student. I can say for sure I know of at least one instance when a professor-student overnight was not appropriate.
 
What are all of you pin heads going to do when this trial is over, and JJ walks??? Your choices seem to be reality TV or attending law school.
 
tnt said:
Actually I'd say the Counselor is holding up pretty well..... Kinda took the wind out of paolis sails when she called him a bully The she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context.... She pretty much ignores them
Yeah, it's always best when an expert witness testifies she'll say anything the questioner wants to hear when under pressure.
 
Special K said:
What are all of you pin heads going to do when this trial is over, and JJ walks??? Your choices seem to be reality TV or attending law school.

I'll just go back to living my life whatever happens. You are projecting when you say we hope JJ gets convicted. No Cat fan I have talked to hopes that. Just because they don't want to play against him does not mean we want him in prison. It's time for Griz fans to stop assuming that. The alleged victim's story is being tested, and if it is deemed unbelieavable, then JJ will walk. So be it - that was the right decision. If it is believable, then he will go to prison. That's up to the jury. All of the stories, challegnes to those stories, witnesses, etc will all be tested and the truth will come out.
 
tnt said:
she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context....
Note to jury: Should ignore that text by Jane Doe saying she thinks she may have been raped.
 
Jerry Punch said:
Special K said:
What are all of you pin heads going to do when this trial is over, and JJ walks??? Your choices seem to be reality TV or attending law school.

I'll just go back to living my life whatever happens.


....but what shall you do with your life when this is all over?
 
tnt said:
Actually I'd say the Counselor is holding up pretty well..... Kinda took the wind out of paolis sails when she called him a bully The she went on to explain NOBODY would put much stock in texts because of their lack of context.... She pretty much ignores them
This woman is apparently a councilor who diagnoses mental problems. By saying she felt bullied and seemed to give the answers Paoli wanted doesn't say much about her qualifications. I think they call that behavior passive/aggressive. Paoli is eating this witness up.
 
Amen, GRIZ Musician !!! The nurse practicioneer is not acting as a therapist, TNT, because she is not qualified to do so. She is acting as a doctor would in this rape exam, and as such, she has no business nor should she be allowed at the facility where Claire Francoeur is employed to act as a buddy or a cheerleader to the alleged victim.

If a nurse or doctor does this, their objectivity and professional judgement were and should be called into question by the defense.

These personal text messages have at least severely damaged or destroyed the credibility of Claire Francoeur as an objective, medical professional that provided not psychotherapy for the patient, for which she is not qualified to do so, but as a medical professional providing a physical exam to an alleged rape victim.
 
billingsgriz said:
Amen, GRIZ Musician !!! The nurse practicioneer is not acting as a therapist, TNT, because she is not qualified to do so. She is acting as a doctor would in this rape exam, and as such, she has no business nor should she be allowed at the facility where Claire Francoeur is employed to act as a buddy or a cheerleader to the alleged victim.

If a nurse or doctor does this, their objectivity and professional judgement were and should be called into question by the defense.

These personal text messages have at least severely damaged or destroyed the credibility of Claire Francoeur as an objective, medical professional that provided not psychotherapy for the patient, for which she is not qualified to do so, but as a medical professional providing a physical exam to an alleged rape victim.

The the nurse practioner isn't on the stand. I think you may be a few days behind.......
 
Back
Top