• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

ISU/Scats Game Thread

CDAGRIZ said:
wbtfg said:
Take comfort in knowing the Twitter Karens are on the case.

I guess that’s better that nothing when a coaching staff and program promote and reward dirty play. I can’t believe Bobcat fans are on here condoning that BS. Disgusting.

You expect better than neanderthal, classless boobcat fanatics?!?!
 
wbtfg said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Yep. If Sixx had a shred of integrity, that player would see a lot of the sideline next game. Can you imagine someone pulling that shit when Ron Ash (winningest coach in modern program history) was the coach? Uh, I think not.

Take comfort in knowing the Twitter Karens are on the case.

The only bright side of that chicken shit attempted neck break/attempted murder was that the pussy was too weak to do any damage.
 
IntuitiveGriz said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I guess that’s better that nothing when a coaching staff and program promote and reward dirty play. I can’t believe Bobcat fans are on here condoning that BS. Disgusting.

You expect better than neanderthal, classless boobcat fanatics?!?!

I suppose I did. I don’t anymore. Notice that the only respectable Cat fans who post here aren’t defending it at all? What we’re left with are the #scumcats who think it was “just football”.
 
CatsRback said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Well, if the BSC officials missed it, it definitely didn’t happen. I’m just glad we know what kind of play Bobfans support. #exposed.

Isn’t your school known for like assault allegations and cheating/ vacating partial seasons? Awkward.

Better than drug dealing coaching staff (that ruins lives) and
athletes that kidnap and cold bloodedly murder, execute in a desolate field. 🤷‍♂️

M state, where you start your life sentences!
 
Butte5518 said:
hm.grwn.grizfan said:
MSU offense looks pretty good, their stadium atmosphere is still so JV. For real though, their offense is looking more consistent than ours at this point, especially the running game. Now that they have a decent passing game I’m fine with them in the top 5.

And are you fine with the griz in the top three after barely hanging on to a very very weak Idaho team that the cats blew out in the first half?

First of all, you're NOT from Butte.

Second of all, are you fine with with a team that hasn't won a NC (that's natio al championship, you're welcome for the clarification) in 38 years and beats a NON SCHOLARHIP team at home..
Are you happy they are in the top 30???
 
Allezchat said:
Alaska Griz said:
Did you actually watch the games? Do you understand the role that turnovers play in football? I'm guessing not but had to ask. The Griz played really sloppy towards the end and won. Winning despite adversity is usually a sign of a good team. If the Griz keep winning why would they drop in the polls? I would say the same about the Cats. If you keep winning you're unlikely to drop in the polls. Should NDSU drop out of the top 5 because they almost lost to a team that we beat by 30? I don't think so. And they likely won't. Just be glad the cats avoid playing Sacramento state. That's incredibly fortunate for you guys. They look like the better team.

So winning despite adversity is good. But getting a bunch of turnovers is just luck I guess and not a sign of a good defense? That's what you're seemingly saying. What was the turnover margin of your defense against the same opponent?
No. I'm saying every game is different. Football is not played in a vacuum. Yes, turnovers can be caused by both good defense and bad offensive execution. NDSU struggled against a team we destroyed yesterday. Does that mean they are not a top team in FCS? No, i don't believe so. They played poorly against a team we played well against. The results were different, but both teams won. It's not that complicated.
 
CatsRback said:
Griz Addict said:
Isn't your team known for coaches selling meth and murder?

Don’t you have law professors touching students and trying to hide it?

Cow Ag gets sued everytime they turn around!

https://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/montana_state_university/montana-state-pays-200-000-in-civil-settlement-to-former-professor-accused-of-harassment/article_dccd8161-c31d-5ed1-aa4e-992a1ed5b368.html

https://newstalkkgvo.com/gay-ex-professor-sues-montana-state-university-over-firing/
 
Butte5518 said:
DuCharme said:
How far does that logic go? The Griz smacked Indiana State worse than ndsu.

And yet they still have a losing record. In fact every team you've played this year has a losing record six games into the season....

And yet the Griz opponents are still 1000 times better than gloried high school team brought into bozo. Cowards.
 
ilovethecats said:
CDAGRIZ said:
I’m honestly surprised, too. I need to learn not to be surprised by how low Bobfans will go. A Bob player could cut a dude’s leg off and throw it at his grandma in the stands, and these f###[#] losers would be on here saying “that’s football” “there wasn’t a flag”. #scumcats

Ouch

The comment isn't "Ouch". The hideous, cowardous kneck break attempt was "OUCH"!!! 😳🙄
 
poorgriz said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Because MSU values and celebrates dead ball assault, as you’ve confirmed, I wish nothing but the very worst for those scumbag human beings. Absolutely pathetic. Any Cat fan who is a decent person would be done with this scum staff for supporting that type of play.

CDA seems stressed.

CDA seems like a non psychopath, like every non boobcat player, coach and fanatic.
 
Allezchat said:
Alaska Griz said:
Did you actually watch the games? Do you understand the role that turnovers play in football? I'm guessing not but had to ask. The Griz played really sloppy towards the end and won. Winning despite adversity is usually a sign of a good team. If the Griz keep winning why would they drop in the polls? I would say the same about the Cats. If you keep winning you're unlikely to drop in the polls. Should NDSU drop out of the top 5 because they almost lost to a team that we beat by 30? I don't think so. And they likely won't. Just be glad the cats avoid playing Sacramento state. That's incredibly fortunate for you guys. They look like the better team.

So winning despite adversity is good. But getting a bunch of turnovers is just luck I guess and not a sign of a good defense? That's what you're seemingly saying. What was the turnover margin of your defense against the same opponent?
I have a rule of thumb on that that has stood up well for many years. TO figures result from 33 1/3 % good plays by the defense, 33 1/3% poor plays by the offense and 33 1/3% luck (the way the ball bounces).
 
kemajic said:
Allezchat said:
So winning despite adversity is good. But getting a bunch of turnovers is just luck I guess and not a sign of a good defense? That's what you're seemingly saying. What was the turnover margin of your defense against the same opponent?
I have a rule of thumb on that that has stood up well for many years. TO figures result from 33 1/3 % good plays by the defense, 33 1/3% poor plays by the offense and 33 1/3% luck (the way the ball bounces).
That's an interesting post kem. I'm curious if you agree that some teams just seem to have a knack for creating turnovers. It seems well coached teams, or at least teams that prioritizes creating turnovers, can move the needle.
 
ABQCat said:
kemajic said:
I have a rule of thumb on that that has stood up well for many years. TO figures result from 33 1/3 % good plays by the defense, 33 1/3% poor plays by the offense and 33 1/3% luck (the way the ball bounces).
That's an interesting post kem. I'm curious if you agree that some teams just seem to have a knack for creating turnovers. It seems well coached teams, or at least teams that prioritizes creating turnovers, can move the needle.

Interesting question. I have one for you: Do you agree that teams whose coaches encourage and support wrenching opposing players’ heads after the play is dead are dirty teams coached by scumbag losers?
 
IntuitiveGriz said:
Butte5518 said:
And yet they still have a losing record. In fact every team you've played this year has a losing record six games into the season....

And yet the Griz opponents are still 1000 times better than gloried high school team brought into bozo. Cowards.

I don't think he realizes that every team the Bobcats have beat also have losing records.. lmfao
 
IntuitiveGriz said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
It will be interesting to see how the Cats look when a team finally decides to make them throw the football

My guess is like shit.

No team will be able to make them throw the ball, THAT'S the thing. Their OL ACTUALLY BLOCKS everybody. What a concept.

Blocks everybody and you forgot to add "even after the play." 😉
 
Alaska Griz said:
Allezchat said:
So winning despite adversity is good. But getting a bunch of turnovers is just luck I guess and not a sign of a good defense? That's what you're seemingly saying. What was the turnover margin of your defense against the same opponent?
No. I'm saying every game is different. Football is not played in a vacuum. Yes, turnovers can be caused by both good defense and bad offensive execution. NDSU struggled against a team we destroyed yesterday. Does that mean they are not a top team in FCS? No, i don't believe so. They played poorly against a team we played well against. The results were different, but both teams won. It's not that complicated.

I agree with that. But you talking about the role of turnovers like you did while espousing winning in adversity seemly swept the turnovers to the side. Often tines the defense casues the poor offense execution.
 
Didn’t read the thread but I assume it must be about the bubcat suspended druggie?

The roid rager?

I tuned into the game for about 11 seconds and the announcer said the roider was supposed to return this game; however, the pimply-back “is still suspended by the ncaa for illegal performance enhancing drugs”. Still! Not much worse than that, but I should not assume with this “program” and its “fans”.

Saw the neighbor and his chest was so puffed out it was almost bigger than his head. Last week, he told me their D was going to improve once the roider retuned. In fact, he said the roider was scheduled to start this game but during the telecast they explained the ncaa said, “not so fast my friend.”

Can you imagine? Not only do they allow a player to illegally play all season, up to and including the NC game, but then they try to prematurely race him back into a starting role before he even served his punishment for cheating.

Unbelievably classless.
 
kemajic said:
Allezchat said:
So winning despite adversity is good. But getting a bunch of turnovers is just luck I guess and not a sign of a good defense? That's what you're seemingly saying. What was the turnover margin of your defense against the same opponent?
I have a rule of thumb on that that has stood up well for many years. TO figures result from 33 1/3 % good plays by the defense, 33 1/3% poor plays by the offense and 33 1/3% luck (the way the ball bounces).

I have the same ratio for tackles by Robbie. 33 1/3% are solo, 33 1/3% are actually not solo though they are credited solo, and 33 1/3% didn't actually happen.

Come on. You need some laughter here. That was kind of funny. 😀
 
Allezchat said:
I just have to say, I'm supposed at how woke egris is. This cancel culture and all.

😉

I think you were “supposed” to try your hand at grammar, scumcat. Maybe it was too busy trying and failing to snap someone’s neck to the cheers of your scum staff.
 
Back
Top