PDXGrizzly said:grizindabox said:I would wave good bye to posters like PDX, spysk and Ursus just to name a few.....biggest whiners ever....pissed that an average team is average and able to bring 420 down off his chill...not cool...
I'm posting opinions on a message board. I know, f*** me, right?
It's more than a little disappointing that someone with so much hype comes in, gets everyone excited, and then wets the bed.
Here are my positive takeaways from this game:
1) Simis is a gamer. He runs well, has great touch, and is an excellent fit for this system. It may be that his personality and play style are just what the O needs.
2) Defensive adjustments were spot on. Those big runs in the first half were virtually nonexistent in the second. Excellent defensive play.
3) Ben Roberts continues to impress. Great catches.
4) Jones' block on the TD run. When a 1000 yard receiver throws that kind of block, you know he's something special.
I get agitated, and "whinny" as I think you put it, when the tools and components are in place for excellent games but either execution or scheme problems render the tools useless. That's on the coaches. Plain and simple. These kids have no quit in them, and that is amazing to watch and see. I just feel, for as good as they are, they are not being placed in a position to succeed.
But take that with a grain of salt. I think if most of us were the head coach (including me) we'd be 0-6. I can't say I'd do better, but I can only call it like I see it.
PlayerRep said:Paytonlives said:argh! said:Paytonlives said:I have Two.
For the life of me I cannot figure out the love for Nguyen. Does he ever actually catch a punt? Does he make players miss as a running back. I would make him full-time WR and give someone else a try at returning, they could not do worse.
Second, the red zone O is ridicules. Fix that and Grizzly are 6-0
nguyen had 11 carries for a 4.3 yard average. calhoun had six for a 1.5 yard average, and favors had about the same average. calhoun went sideways quite a bit instead of straight-on. on punt returns, nguyen had one for 10 yards and henderson one for 5 yards. and yes, he makes people miss.
i wish the endless, inaccurate nguyen bashing would stop.
Argh, I respectfully disagree... Nguyen would be much better at WR. It fits his abilities, and would get him is space. I have a problem with him as a punt returner because he does not do the number one thing a punt returner is suppose to do. CATCH THE STUPID PUNT! And this has happened for 2 YEARS!
He repeatedly cost the Griz 10-15 yards in field poss. because he lets the ball hit the turf. Even the one he fielded late in the game was dangerously on a bounce. He also called for a fair catch and caught another one on a bounce!
Im not bashing... its just the facts... he is not good as a punt returner.
Nguyen didn't cost UM 10-15 yards yesterday on any punt that could have been fielded. Those are the facts yesterday. While I have no problem with Henderson's fielding a long punt back on the 5 yesterday (given that he was trying to make something happen), that one cost UM more yardage than any of Nguyen's and more than Nguyen combined.
reinell30 said:This is the most predictable offense ever assembled at UM. Everyone says,"we beat NDSU how come we can't beat the teams we should beat?" Simple, the NDSU game had no video of what to expect from us. Since then, all teams can see what the offense does. They move all their guys up to the line and rush the QB. The WR's run deep and there is no time for the QB to get them the ball. Fix this with VERY SHORT route's. Where were the screen passes to Nguyen? He is in there the most because of pass blocking and catching yet he never gets a pass thrown to him. Stitt can't change this offense totally because this is what he knows.
As long as we remain predictable, we will continue to get personnel injured and yes, lose!
The defense is OUTSTANDING!
O-Line needs help by the QB releasing the ball quicker, they can't block!
Simis can run this offense, very capable young man, get him the reps.
Quick slant routes will relieve some pressure off the QB's.
Get the ball to Nguyen or Calhoun more!
Fans stop complaining about kicking field goals or not. One week this board goes nuts over too many field goals then they bitch because the team didn't kick them.
Roberts and HORNER need to be in the game more. Where is Reese Carlson? Big receivers across the middle will help the QB. This hasn't happened since the NDSU game.
grizindabox said:PDXGrizzly said:grizindabox said:I would wave good bye to posters like PDX, spysk and Ursus just to name a few.....biggest whiners ever....pissed that an average team is average and able to bring 420 down off his chill...not cool...
I'm posting opinions on a message board. I know, f*** me, right?
It's more than a little disappointing that someone with so much hype comes in, gets everyone excited, and then wets the bed.
Here are my positive takeaways from this game:
1) Simis is a gamer. He runs well, has great touch, and is an excellent fit for this system. It may be that his personality and play style are just what the O needs.
2) Defensive adjustments were spot on. Those big runs in the first half were virtually nonexistent in the second. Excellent defensive play.
3) Ben Roberts continues to impress. Great catches.
4) Jones' block on the TD run. When a 1000 yard receiver throws that kind of block, you know he's something special.
I get agitated, and "whinny" as I think you put it, when the tools and components are in place for excellent games but either execution or scheme problems render the tools useless. That's on the coaches. Plain and simple. These kids have no quit in them, and that is amazing to watch and see. I just feel, for as good as they are, they are not being placed in a position to succeed.
But take that with a grain of salt. I think if most of us were the head coach (including me) we'd be 0-6. I can't say I'd do better, but I can only call it like I see it.
I think you should take a much closer look....
PDXGrizzly said:grizindabox said:PDXGrizzly said:grizindabox said:I would wave good bye to posters like PDX, spysk and Ursus just to name a few.....biggest whiners ever....pissed that an average team is average and able to bring 420 down off his chill...not cool...
I'm posting opinions on a message board. I know, f*** me, right?
It's more than a little disappointing that someone with so much hype comes in, gets everyone excited, and then wets the bed.
Here are my positive takeaways from this game:
1) Simis is a gamer. He runs well, has great touch, and is an excellent fit for this system. It may be that his personality and play style are just what the O needs.
2) Defensive adjustments were spot on. Those big runs in the first half were virtually nonexistent in the second. Excellent defensive play.
3) Ben Roberts continues to impress. Great catches.
4) Jones' block on the TD run. When a 1000 yard receiver throws that kind of block, you know he's something special.
I get agitated, and "whinny" as I think you put it, when the tools and components are in place for excellent games but either execution or scheme problems render the tools useless. That's on the coaches. Plain and simple. These kids have no quit in them, and that is amazing to watch and see. I just feel, for as good as they are, they are not being placed in a position to succeed.
But take that with a grain of salt. I think if most of us were the head coach (including me) we'd be 0-6. I can't say I'd do better, but I can only call it like I see it.
I think you should take a much closer look....
Aha! I knew you were a complainer like me! What components (besides the rather glaring OL issues) need to be in place for this team? What do you think?
PlayerRep said:If I could change anything, I would make our qb's healthy. If I could change another thing, I would make Weyer healthy. I won't list the other 25 things.
Paytonlives said:I have Two.
For the life of me I cannot figure out the love for Nguyen. Does he ever actually catch a punt? Does he make players miss as a running back. I would make him full-time WR and give someone else a try at returning, they could not do worse.
Second, the red zone O is ridicules. Fix that and Grizzly are 6-0
krammer said:do not be stubborn, use the coin flip to our advantage, home crowed when they are in the stands (and pumped up) at the beginning of the game, not when half the people are still in the parking lot getting their buzz on....I know how offensive minded we are, but we went 3 and out again on the first drive....geeez ,,,this type of thing we have control over and is a lapse in coaching in my opinion...
Paytonlives said:On the last drive, he let the sucker bounce and it did cost 13 yards... check the film. He is a college punt returner... catch the damn ball!!! BTW Henderson made an error also!
PlayerRep said:Paytonlives said:On the last drive, he let the sucker bounce and it did cost 13 yards... check the film. He is a college punt returner... catch the damn ball!!! BTW Henderson made an error also!
That punt went out of bounds. Are you saying he should have caught it?
PlayerRep said:Paytonlives said:argh! said:Paytonlives said:I have Two.
For the life of me I cannot figure out the love for Nguyen. Does he ever actually catch a punt? Does he make players miss as a running back. I would make him full-time WR and give someone else a try at returning, they could not do worse.
Second, the red zone O is ridicules. Fix that and Grizzly are 6-0
nguyen had 11 carries for a 4.3 yard average. calhoun had six for a 1.5 yard average, and favors had about the same average. calhoun went sideways quite a bit instead of straight-on. on punt returns, nguyen had one for 10 yards and henderson one for 5 yards. and yes, he makes people miss.
i wish the endless, inaccurate nguyen bashing would stop.
Argh, I respectfully disagree... Nguyen would be much better at WR. It fits his abilities, and would get him is space. I have a problem with him as a punt returner because he does not do the number one thing a punt returner is suppose to do. CATCH THE STUPID PUNT! And this has happened for 2 YEARS!
He repeatedly cost the Griz 10-15 yards in field poss. because he lets the ball hit the turf. Even the one he fielded late in the game was dangerously on a bounce. He also called for a fair catch and caught another one on a bounce!
Im not bashing... its just the facts... he is not good as a punt returner.
Nguyen didn't cost UM 10-15 yards yesterday on any punt that could have been fielded. Those are the facts yesterday. While I have no problem with Henderson's fielding a long punt back on the 5 yesterday (given that he was trying to make something happen), that one cost UM more yardage than any of Nguyen's and more than Nguyen combined.
I saw something on ESPN about that last night. The 5 is the new 10. It's based on the way punters spin the ball now to get backward spin. In reality, let it go inside the 5 only. I don't necessarily agree with that, but that's what the big boys are doing in college FB. Also, they said otherwise no matter what, catch the stinkin ball.
FireGriz said:1. Peter Nguyen is not the running back this offense needs. Take away a 20 yard run that took advantage of an edge blitz by Weber and his average for the day was the same as the other backs. Peter can't take on tacklers and fall forward, he's just not big enough. He'd be much better suited as a slot receiver, as said already.FireGriz said:take away nguyen's 21 yarder, and he still averaged more than a yard more per carry than the other backs (2.8). take away calhoun's longest run, and he averaged 1.0 yards per carry. take away favors' longest run and he went for 0.5 yards per carry. gawd, the stupidity.