-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Idaho football
- Thread starter grizindabox
- Start date
HighLineGRIZ
Well-known member
MrTitleist said:
In my mind, most of those programs are better suited for the FCS. The only program that has a higher average attendance than Montana is Arkansas St, who only averages about 26,000 per game. Most the rest are in the mid teens. The conference lost a large majority of their non-conference games, only beating two teams that made a bowl game and only beating 3 teams from BCS conferences. Most of their non-conference wins came against FCS teams that didn't make the playoffs.
They might be fun to watch, but they aren't that competitive. Adding two of the historically worst FBS programs and two programs moving up, makes it an even less competitve conference.
What does attendance average have to do with being an FBS team? There are FCS teams that draw higher than FBS teams.. there are also D2 and D3 teams that draw more fans than FCS teams. Attendance is irrelevant. The Sun Belt isn't the SEC, many of their FBS OOC opponents are mostly to pay the bills.. that's why you don't see Louisiana Lafayette blowing the doors off of LSU or Ole Miss.
HighLineGRIZ
Well-known member
Titelist, you're the one that said that they "are putting fans in the seats". Most of them are struggling to meet the 15,000 attendance minimum. Attendance is important. It reflects the strength of your fan base and your ability to generate revenue as a program. If you struggle in those areas and you can't compete with FBS teams outside your conference, it's difficult to argue that you are an FBS quality program.
Now, those teams are generating more money by splitting bowl and TV revenue, but the average football fan couldn't name you 3 teams from that conference off the top of their head.
Now, those teams are generating more money by splitting bowl and TV revenue, but the average football fan couldn't name you 3 teams from that conference off the top of their head.
Even if UM had a good place to move up to, how would UM pay for the necessary additional expenses? As of several years ago, the figure in the study was over $5 million per year needed to fund moving up.
In fact, how is UM going to cut $400,000 from its current budget due to UM budget shortfalls, and then add a new women's sport next year at a cost of almost $1 million per year?
And the weight room and locker rooms, and indoor practice facility? Let's see if the academic center really has enough money to break ground in the near future.
In fact, how is UM going to cut $400,000 from its current budget due to UM budget shortfalls, and then add a new women's sport next year at a cost of almost $1 million per year?
And the weight room and locker rooms, and indoor practice facility? Let's see if the academic center really has enough money to break ground in the near future.
PlayerRep said:
playerrep has it right,,,we are were we are because it is where we belong. period....we are having trouble with funds now for most everything we need to upgrade...why is this so difficult to understand...we cannot afford it and the payouts of the fbs in a throwa way conference would make matters worse imo...
Below are some numbers regarding App St's move up. Costs will increase by $4 - $6 million. Revenue will increase by $1.5 million. The shortfall of $2.5 - $4.5 million will presumably need to come from increases in donations. I don't believe App St sports receive any state funds. A feasibility study that App St did several years ago, said that they would need to increase their budget by over $5 million, which is what UM's feasibility study said for UM.
“ASU’s athletics budget is now about $16 million annually, and projections are that it will increase by $4 to $6 million with the move. The move is estimated to yield about a $1.5 million increase in revenue a year.”
http://www.appfans.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
“ASU’s athletics budget is now about $16 million annually, and projections are that it will increase by $4 to $6 million with the move. The move is estimated to yield about a $1.5 million increase in revenue a year.”
http://www.appfans.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Grizzly Oredigger
Well-known member
krammer said:
Right there with ya Krammer. Happiness has to do with contentment. I'm content with where we are. Just be happy and lets get another NC
billings_poke
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
$5 million per year is about what the MWC pays out to its members. just FYI and that does not include the payout form the new playoff system which is projected to be about $1 to $1.5 million per FBS team not in the top 5 conferences. The money in the MWC is there. I get that UM is not on the radar right now but if a MWC invite came you could not use money as an excuse.
btw
from the APPY site
"But revenue will increase, with more NCAA Tournament revenue, bowl game and television revenue shares, and bigger paychecks for road games against FBS opponents. The move is estimated to yield about a $1.5 million increase in revenue a year, from what it will get from a Sun Belt share, and other revenue will be generated by ticket sales, athletics fund raising and a student-fee increase.
“But that’s something that can occur over a period of time and it’s very consistent with what we’ve done over the last five years in terms of student-fee requests,” Cobb said. “It’s a continuum that we’ve been on the last several years anyway…. It’s over a period of time and it’s a small stair step on par with what we’ve been doing.”
Peacock said: “We’re not going to do this on the backs of students.”
seems they have a plan. Btw there is another 1.5 million coming in not mentioned in the article
http://www.journalnow.com/sports/asu/article_8831fee0-9731-11e2-acc0-001a4bcf6878.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
PlayerRep said:
North Carolina's definition of athletics funding, is much, much narrower than Montana's. The state-funded improvements for athletics facilities are substantial, but are not considered athletics funding. In addition, schools in the UNC system, of which App State is a part, get pretty creative about pairing projects. App State has a $45 million residency hall and football facilities expansion in the works that basically attaches new endzone seating to the backside of a very large dormitory. There's another $16 million in state funding for non-football related athletics facilities upgrades for the App State Campus.
The budget picture for UM athletics would be very different if appropriations were similarly structured in Montana.
billings_poke said:
Where's the other $1.5 million not mentioned in the article coming from? How do you know that?
How is the shortfall going to be covered, whether new revenue is $1.5 million or $3 million (which I doubt, by the way)?
Where's your source on $5 million per team payouts for the MW? I see that they get $1 million per team from tv. I'm doubting the $5 million figure, at least for now. This article or whatever it is says that the following about the MW payout last year: "The total payout for the Mountain West last year was $2.6 million (See Jack Graham's presentation for the proposed stadium at CSU for this figure)...."
http://www.mwcconnection.com/2012/5/31/3054992/aztecs-expect-6-4-million-from-big-east-deal" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
