Catsrback76 said:Not only will it gas your O line, your defense will be on the field ALL day long and give up tons of yards and points because they too are gassed. Someone once said that about the hurry up style of play! Get ready for a very disappointing defensive year!
:thumb:Griz90 said:I posed this issue to Coach Stitt during a round of golf and his answer was very informative as to his philosophy. For starters the o-line does not have to chase down a ball carrier - wether it be run or pass -while the d-line does. An o-lineman has to lay down his block and hustle to the next line of scrimmage. A D-lineman has to chase the play till the whistle blows. The o-line coach is tasked with watching his line closely during the game and when they appear to be getting tired he passes that info on to Stitt who said he then will call one of his more than 20 versions of the wide receiver screen. When the wide receiver screen is called the o-line has to hold its block for about two seconds while the d-line has to sprint to the sideline and chase the play..and sprint back to the new line of scrimmage because of the speed of which the next play is called. Stitt expects to have the offense lined up 17-20 seconds after the whistle is blown on the previous play. Basically when a wide receiver screen is called the d-line has to run two 20yd sprints and then be lined up for the next play. Stitt said he will often call the screen to the wide side of the field to make the D run even farther. Part of the reason he goes for it on fourth down is to "mind f&@k" the defense. He loves the look on the defenders' faces when they get all jacked up after stopping the offense on third down and then realize they have to defend a fourth down. Even better, he says, is when a defensive coordinate wants to change personnel on a third down play and the defensive players refuse to do,it because thy are too tired to run to the sideline. He told me he sees that a lot. Coach Stitt has been running this offense a long time and is definitely conscious of its impact on his linemen. They will be well conditioned and ready to run an uptempo offense and execute 90+ plays a game.
UofMGrizFan said::thumb:Griz90 said:I posed this issue to Coach Stitt during a round of golf and his answer was very informative as to his philosophy. For starters the o-line does not have to chase down a ball carrier - wether it be run or pass -while the d-line does. An o-lineman has to lay down his block and hustle to the next line of scrimmage. A D-lineman has to chase the play till the whistle blows. The o-line coach is tasked with watching his line closely during the game and when they appear to be getting tired he passes that info on to Stitt who said he then will call one of his more than 20 versions of the wide receiver screen. When the wide receiver screen is called the o-line has to hold its block for about two seconds while the d-line has to sprint to the sideline and chase the play..and sprint back to the new line of scrimmage because of the speed of which the next play is called. Stitt expects to have the offense lined up 17-20 seconds after the whistle is blown on the previous play. Basically when a wide receiver screen is called the d-line has to run two 20yd sprints and then be lined up for the next play. Stitt said he will often call the screen to the wide side of the field to make the D run even farther. Part of the reason he goes for it on fourth down is to "mind f&@k" the defense. He loves the look on the defenders' faces when they get all jacked up after stopping the offense on third down and then realize they have to defend a fourth down. Even better, he says, is when a defensive coordinate wants to change personnel on a third down play and the defensive players refuse to do,it because thy are too tired to run to the sideline. He told me he sees that a lot. Coach Stitt has been running this offense a long time and is definitely conscious of its impact on his linemen. They will be well conditioned and ready to run an uptempo offense and execute 90+ plays a game.
IdaGriz01 said:Been lots of talk about who runs a "hurry up" offense, versus who's good on time of possession. Just to insert some real numbers into the (ahem) discussion, here are Big Sky numbers from last year. (Taken from the NCAA statistics site.) The teams are ranked by their plays per game, BTW
Offensive Plays and TOP -- Big Sky Teams
Team, Plays per Game, Time of Possession (min./game)
ISU ..... 82.7 28.3
CP ...... 78.8 31.8
EWU ... 77.1 31.4
MSU ... 73.9 31.8
SacSt .. 73.8 31.1
PSU .... 73.4 28.7
SUU .... 72.8 27.1
NAU ... 72.1 32.1
WSU ... 70.5 28.8
NoCol. 64.5 29.7
UM ..... 63.8 28.1
UND ... 61.1 29.7
UC-D.. 60.0 28.0
Some take-aways.
One: Last year, nobody ran the kind of tempo Stitt is planning for the Griz (90+ per game). ISP, CP and EWU were up there pretty good, but nobody came close to 90. (And, if I recall correctly, 90 was the minimum number of plays Stitt wants to run.)
Two: The correlation between the number of plays the offense ran and what their TOP ended up to be is only weakly correlated. ISU, the team that ran the most plays per game, had one of the lowest TOP. Granted, EWU and CP had both high plays per game and TOP. But NAU, which was well back in the pack in plays run, had the highest TOP.
Three: The Griz, with the third-lowest plays per game, and a crappy TOP, still went 6-2 in conference, tied with MSU and ISU.
Just thought you'd like to know.![]()
AllWeatherFan said:I can't wait to see the look on Coach Ron Ash's face.
westnodak93bison said:Griz fans should be more concerned about their D line holding up to NDSU's big nasty O line. Starters from left to right weigh in at 310, 326, 301, 300 and 300
LongTimeCatFan said:grizindabox said:LongTimeCatFan said:grizindabox said:TOP for CSM last season 31:44 to 28:16. So even with the hurry up Stitt offense, CSM had the ball more than the opponent. Also, as many possessions does not mean the same TOP or number of plays.
The season prior CSM had TOP of 32:53.
I'm pretty sure MSU's TOP stats looked like that too, but the DL was gassed every game.
You'll see.
Hell, the Griz TOP last season was 28:09. MSU was 31:46. I think you are trying to make generalized assumptions just because of what you believe hurry up means.
I think you're grasping at straws because you've clearly never played the game at a high level.
Neither have I, but I do know what hurry up means and have seen the consequences of running such an offense to both sides of the ball.
Griz90 said:I posed this issue to Coach Stitt during a round of golf and his answer was very informative as to his philosophy. For starters the o-line does not have to chase down a ball carrier - wether it be run or pass -while the d-line does. An o-lineman has to lay down his block and hustle to the next line of scrimmage. A D-lineman has to chase the play till the whistle blows. The o-line coach is tasked with watching his line closely during the game and when they appear to be getting tired he passes that info on to Stitt who said he then will call one of his more than 20 versions of the wide receiver screen. When the wide receiver screen is called the o-line has to hold its block for about two seconds while the d-line has to sprint to the sideline and chase the play..and sprint back to the new line of scrimmage because of the speed of which the next play is called. Stitt expects to have the offense lined up 17-20 seconds after the whistle is blown on the previous play. Basically when a wide receiver screen is called the d-line has to run two 20yd sprints and then be lined up for the next play. Stitt said he will often call the screen to the wide side of the field to make the D run even farther. Part of the reason he goes for it on fourth down is to "mind f&@k" the defense. He loves the look on the defenders' faces when they get all jacked up after stopping the offense on third down and then realize they have to defend a fourth down. Even better, he says, is when a defensive coordinate wants to change personnel on a third down play and the defensive players refuse to do,it because thy are too tired to run to the sideline. He told me he sees that a lot. Coach Stitt has been running this offense a long time and is definitely conscious of its impact on his linemen. They will be well conditioned and ready to run an uptempo offense and execute 90+ plays a game.
You guys try entirely too hard, especially considering the results.poorgriz said:LongTimeCatFan said:grizindabox said:LongTimeCatFan said:I'm pretty sure MSU's TOP stats looked like that too, but the DL was gassed every game.
You'll see.
Hell, the Griz TOP last season was 28:09. MSU was 31:46. I think you are trying to make generalized assumptions just because of what you believe hurry up means.
I think you're grasping at straws because you've clearly never played the game at a high level.
Neither have I, but I do know what hurry up means and have seen the consequences of running such an offense to both sides of the ball.
Don't bother LTCF, I tried to point this exact thing out to them when Stitt announced he wanted to run 100 plays a game, but they truly don't get it. All I heard was how much better UM's D was than MSU's and that this new offense was actually going to HELP the UM D. As you've said, they will find out. It's goingto be comical watching the implosion on this sight when the UM defensive stats start getting skewed and all the posters jum on here and start asking "HOW IN THE HELL IS OUR DEFENSE WORSE THAN LAST YEAR!!!!". In fact I'm guessing we will see that exact sentence as the title of a thread on here sometime throughout the season. I've already placed several wagers with my griz fan buddies about what the UM defensive stats will look like at the end of the year. (Hint - the will be worse in probably every category).
grizindabox said:The entire argument that LTCF and poorgriz want to bang on has much more to do with converting 3rd downs than playing an uptempo offense. If the Griz are good at converting 3rd downs and sustaining drives their argument is really moot, but if the Griz are poor on third down, and become a 3-and-out machine, then it could be a huge problem for the defense. But of course, we could say that for any defense that has an offense that is horrible on third down.
LongTimeCatFan said:grizindabox said:The entire argument that LTCF and poorgriz want to bang on has much more to do with converting 3rd downs than playing an uptempo offense. If the Griz are good at converting 3rd downs and sustaining drives their argument is really moot, but if the Griz are poor on third down, and become a 3-and-out machine, then it could be a huge problem for the defense. But of course, we could say that for any defense that has an offense that is horrible on third down.
Or if you score in 4-6 plays