As we all know, the shortcomings of almost every mid major come with the frontcourt. Guards are generally seen as being easier to recruit both from the portal with a lot of proven D-1 talent, and from high school. Moody was a good get. Taking a shot from D-2 with Brown was unnecessary, as was Oke. In an era of the portal these coaches have failed to adjust.
With a look around the conference, the only team with undoubtedly worse guard play is ISU. Bottom 3 guard play in conference has been UM, WSU, and ISU. The top team in the conference graduated their top two guards and have replaced them with two division one transfers, both of whom will be honored by the conference in some fashion.
Every team, except those three, have a level of star punch from their guards. For two teams that have frontcourt talent to the degree of UM and WSU, they should both be towards the front of the conference.
So, my question: Why? Why take risks in an era of proven talent?
With a look around the conference, the only team with undoubtedly worse guard play is ISU. Bottom 3 guard play in conference has been UM, WSU, and ISU. The top team in the conference graduated their top two guards and have replaced them with two division one transfers, both of whom will be honored by the conference in some fashion.
Every team, except those three, have a level of star punch from their guards. For two teams that have frontcourt talent to the degree of UM and WSU, they should both be towards the front of the conference.
So, my question: Why? Why take risks in an era of proven talent?