GRIZ/WEBER

[CDAGRIZ]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:

I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry

And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

 

[Lou]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:

I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry

And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

Hence the nickname: Ol' Neverwrong

 

[Grizbacker1]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:

I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry

And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little fag friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

 

[CDAGRIZ]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:

I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry

And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little happy person friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

You ORIGINALLY said that guards should shoot AT LEAST 70% from the line in COLLEGE. And if they cannot do that, well, you all know the rest by now....

I gave some examples af guards who, by your standards, did not belong in college BB. Yes, you still may have recruited them, but once they got to college, you would determine that they did not belong. GRIZ/Bengals thread, remember? You said nothing about high school originally.

"I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry."

Now that we have that cleared up, when are you going to tell this to Cameron's face?

 

[Grizbacker1]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:

I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry

And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little happy person friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

You ORIGINALLY said that guards should shoot AT LEAST 70% from the line in COLLEGE. And if they cannot do that, well, you all know the rest by now....

I gave some examples af guards who, by your standards, did not belong in college BB. Yes, you still may have recruited them, but once they got to college, you would determine that they did not belong. GRIZ/Bengals thread, remember? You said nothing about high school originally.

"I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry."

Here is a suggestion, make a copy of it, so then you can cut and paste like louise does. respond all you want, I am done.

 

[CDAGRIZ]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:



And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little happy person friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

You ORIGINALLY said that guards should shoot AT LEAST 70% from the line in COLLEGE. And if they cannot do that, well, you all know the rest by now....

I gave some examples af guards who, by your standards, did not belong in college BB. Yes, you still may have recruited them, but once they got to college, you would determine that they did not belong. GRIZ/Bengals thread, remember? You said nothing about high school originally.

"I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry."

Here is a suggestion, make a copy of it, so then you can cut and paste like louise does. respond all you want, I am done.

This is copied and pasted directly form your post. The source is plainly cited. When are you going to tell Cameron that he doesn't belong if his FT% happens to drop below 70%?

 

[Grizbacker1]

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little happy person friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

You ORIGINALLY said that guards should shoot AT LEAST 70% from the line in COLLEGE. And if they cannot do that, well, you all know the rest by now....

I gave some examples af guards who, by your standards, did not belong in college BB. Yes, you still may have recruited them, but once they got to college, you would determine that they did not belong. GRIZ/Bengals thread, remember? You said nothing about high school originally.

"I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry."

Here is a suggestion, make a copy of it, so then you can cut and paste like louise does. respond all you want, I am done.

This is copied and pasted directly form your post. The source is plainly cited. When are you going to tell Cameron that he doesn't belong if his FT% happens to drop below 70%?

I already told you when I get to Missoula I will get Hasquet and Cam together and you can dance around what you said about hasquet. Now you deny you were making fun of him, yet he admitted you wouldn't say it to his face. Cam will do what he always does, laugh at me and say that's funny. BFD. Start working on some good stories to tell Jordo.

 

[Lou]

I know what you said about HS recruiting, but don't you dare act like you didn't say this:



And don't try to act like you meant that a guard should shoot over 0% to belong. You know damn well what you said, and so do I.

And don't try to bring it to PM's so you don't look like an idiot on the public forum. Lord knows you try to make me look stupid (fruitlessly).

It would be pretty easy to admit that there are exceptions to your "rule" quoted above, but you'd rather avert. This is the only thing you do that dsappoints me. You simply cannot admit it when you say something incorrect.

I don't try to make you look stupid, you do that all by yourself. You post college stats when I am talking about HS recuiting so you cantry and twist shit. You and your little happy person friend Loulou need to get over your obsession with me. :loser:

You ORIGINALLY said that guards should shoot AT LEAST 70% from the line in COLLEGE. And if they cannot do that, well, you all know the rest by now....

I gave some examples af guards who, by your standards, did not belong in college BB. Yes, you still may have recruited them, but once they got to college, you would determine that they did not belong. GRIZ/Bengals thread, remember? You said nothing about high school originally.

"I am sorry, but a guard at a MINIMUM, should shoot 70%. You do not belong in college basketball as a guard if you can't make a FT, I am sorry."

Here is a suggestion, make a copy of it, so then you can cut and paste like louise does. respond all you want, I am done.

I have no respect for GB1. Everytime you prove him wrong he says "blah blah I'm done.....you guys are dumb blah blah"

Why can't he admit to being wrong. You show him what he posted and he still says that's not what he said. :loser:

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Here's what I said about JH: "Just look at our hair!" and "Have you seen the pic? Those are some flowing locks!" Pretty benign.

And you think I have to be willing to say something to someone's face in order to not be making fun of him? Wow.

I think what you said is a bit worse, and so do you.


Since you are on the HS kick (even though it's deflecting), assume for a minute that there is a MD AA PG who shoots 68% FTs and A one star that shoots 75%, you are committed to recruiting the one star before the All American. See how stupid that is?

But that's beside the point since you only mentioned college BB in the beginning and that CR didn't deserve to play it if he shot below 70%. He's close to the edge, I tell ya :loser:

 

[Grizbacker1]

Here's what I said about JH: "Just look at our hair!" and "Have you seen the pic? Those are some flowing locks!" Pretty benign.

And you think I have to be willing to say something to someone's face in order to not be making fun of him? Wow.

I think what you said is a bit worse, and so do you.


Since you are on the HS kick (even though it's deflecting), assume for a minute that there is a MD AA PG who shoots 68% FTs and A one star that shoots 75%, you are committed to recruiting the one star before the All American. See how stupid that is?

But that's beside the point since youonly mentioned college BB in the beginning and that CR didn't deserve to play it if he shot below 70%.

sleep:

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Here's what I said about JH: "Just look at our hair!" and "Have you seen the pic? Those are some flowing locks!" Pretty benign.

And you think I have to be willing to say something to someone's face in order to not be making fun of him? Wow.

I think what you said is a bit worse, and so do you.


Since you are on the HS kick (even though it's deflecting), assume for a minute that there is a MD AA PG who shoots 68% FTs and A one star that shoots 75%, you are committed to recruiting the one star before the All American. See how stupid that is?

But that's beside the point since youonly mentioned college BB in the beginning and that CR didn't deserve to play it if he shot below 70%.

sleep:

There's the reaction I've wanted all along.

For the win:

Me: you are wrong
GB1: no I'm not.
ME: yes you are, and here's why: XYZ
GB1: yeah, well you are dumb!
ME: Doesn't change what you said....
GB1: I can't hear you, LALALALALA.....

 

[Grizbacker1]

Here's what I said about JH: "Just look at our hair!" and "Have you seen the pic? Those are some flowing locks!" Pretty benign.

And you think I have to be willing to say something to someone's face in order to not be making fun of him? Wow.

I think what you said is a bit worse, and so do you.


Since you are on the HS kick (even though it's deflecting), assume for a minute that there is a MD AA PG who shoots 68% FTs and A one star that shoots 75%, you are committed to recruiting the one star before the All American. See how stupid that is?

But that's beside the point since youonly mentioned college BB in the beginning and that CR didn't deserve to play it if he shot below 70%.

sleep:

There's the reaction I've wanted all along.

For the win:

Me: you are wrong
GB1: no I'm not.
ME: yes you are, and here's why: XYZ
GB1: yeah, well you are dumb!
ME: Doesn't change what you said....
GB1: I can't hear you, LALALALALA.....

and you are the guy bragging about your grades? those were your recent junior high scores apparently. now run along, you are beginning to bore me.

 

[Lou]

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Here's what Backer just Pm'd me:

You guys piss me off so bad sometimes by arguing with everything that I have to argue back. I see the point both of you are making and I agree mostly. I just think that FT shooting is very important and I was pissed that we lost that game. Stop harrassing me and I'll stop harrassing you. Don't tell anyone I said this or I'll deny every word of it, I have a reputation to uphold on this board :thumb:

:laugh: :laugh: Should just admit it for everyone to see GB1

 

[CDAGRIZ]

Here's what I said about JH: "Just look at our hair!" and "Have you seen the pic? Those are some flowing locks!" Pretty benign.

And you think I have to be willing to say something to someone's face in order to not be making fun of him? Wow.

I think what you said is a bit worse, and so do you.


Since you are on the HS kick (even though it's deflecting), assume for a minute that there is a MD AA PG who shoots 68% FTs and A one star that shoots 75%, you are committed to recruiting the one star before the All American. See how stupid that is?

But that's beside the point since youonly mentioned college BB in the beginning and that CR didn't deserve to play it if he shot below 70%.

sleep:

There's the reaction I've wanted all along.

For the win:

Me: you are wrong
GB1: no I'm not.
ME: yes you are, and here's why: XYZ
GB1: yeah, well you are dumb!
ME: Doesn't change what you said....
GB1: I can't hear you, LALALALALA.....

and you are the guy bragging about your grades? those were your recent junior high scores apparently. now run along, you are beginning to bore me.

Oh I forgot one at the end:

There's the reaction I've wanted all along.

For the win:

Me: you are wrong
GB1: no I'm not.
ME: yes you are, and here's why: XYZ
GB1: yeah, well you are dumb!
ME: Doesn't change what you said....
GB1: I can't hear you, LALALALALA.....
GB1: I can hear you now, but you are still dumb!

 

[AtHomeInTheDahlbergDen]

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
I can't remember the last time I used an emoticon but this warrants one. Congrats CDA on the excellent message board win. Who's printing up the shirts?

 

[CDAGRIZ]

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
I can't remember the last time I used an emoticon but this warrants one. Congrats CDA on the excellent message board win. Who's printing up the shirts?

HAHA! I get ya. Probably didn't need to include that part. It was pretty heated for awhile though, I got caught up. I am glad to get the emoticon out of you though :thumb:

 

[Bozgriz]

It is not unreasonable to ask a college player to shoot 70% at the FT line...

Is it effective? Ask the Idaho State women's team, they lead the country in FT shooting... :twocents:

 

[Grizbacker1]

It is not unreasonable to ask a college player to shoot 70% at the FT line...

Is it effective? Ask the Idaho State women's team, they lead the country in FT shooting... :twocents:

If I am the coach, and my ass is on the line, I am recruiting kids that can make a freaking free throw. I am entitled to my opinion, period. I can prove, beyond a doubt, that 1/3 of a teams games in a season will be won or lost at the FT line. Look at the close losses UM has had, the individual game stats are available. Tell me I am wrong.

 

[Lou]

It is not unreasonable to ask a college player to shoot 70% at the FT line...

Is it effective? Ask the Idaho State women's team, they lead the country in FT shooting... :twocents:

If I am the coach, and my ass is on the line, I am recruiting kids that can make a freaking free throw. I am entitled to my opinion, period. I can prove, beyond a doubt, that 1/3 of a teams games in a season will be won or lost at the FT line. Look at the close losses UM has had, the individual game stats are available. Tell me I am wrong.

YOU ARE WRONG!!!

 

[Lou]

It is not unreasonable to ask a college player to shoot 70% at the FT line...

Is it effective? Ask the Idaho State women's team, they lead the country in FT shooting... :twocents:

If I am the coach, and my ass is on the line, I am recruiting kids that can make a freaking free throw. I am entitled to my opinion, period. I can prove, beyond a doubt, that 1/3 of a teams games in a season will be won or lost at the FT line. Look at the close losses UM has had, the individual game stats are available. Tell me I am wrong.

GB1,
I know that you like to argue a lot, especially with me. The thing is-is that I know that you know I'm right most of the time. I also understand that you aren't the type of person to say "I'm sorry." So, being the nice guy that I am, I won't make you tell me. Instead of having you say write those words to me; I will take you not responding to this as you saying you are sorry.

P.S. If you disagree with any of this please go ahead and respond; if not, then everyone will know that you really are sorry. Thanks GB1.

Sincerely,
Lou