grizindabox said:
PlayerRep said:
grizindabox said:
Seriously, how big of a gap do you think is between Montana and the Oregon's of the FBS world? And go ahead and keep using the extremes to try and prove your point.
The point is that the greater the disparity, the more likely there is to be more injuries, over time and over many games. The less the disparity, then the less the injury factor, again over many games.
I will not argue that a bunch of 5th graders playing the Dolphins would lead to more injures, but the original direction of this thread was about a FCS team playing a FBS team, both full of 18-22 year old recruited athletes. So my entire point was that I do not agree with the notion that Griz football players are more likely to be injured when playing teams like Oregon or Washington based on size, speed, or strength, because I do not believe that the disparity is of significance overall.
You do agree that a great disparity between each level would lead to more injury though as you just stated, in 5th graders vs Dolphins. Where we disagree is you believe the difference between us and UO is minimal, which I'm truly not stating is exponential I think we played a damn good game against them for the most part, but there is still a differential however small it may be which overtime would result in more injuries.
Again, I had originally intended to shut spankys dumbass up, and I don't feel injuries are one of the main reasons to not play those teams, but over time and if enough plays are taken into account there will be a greater risk and number of injuries however small or large that amount may be.